Literature DB >> 31781896

The impact of age at orchiopexy on testicular cancer outcomes.

Margaret Higgins1, Derek E Smith2, Dexiang Gao2, Duncan Wilcox3, Nicholas G Cost3, Amanda F Saltzman4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To estimate how many boys with UDT must undergo orchiopexy to prevent one case of TC, one death from TC and one exposure to TC treatment beyond radical orchiectomy as compared to being treated at an older age.
METHODS: This retrospective study utilized data from a 2007 Swedish study of males who underwent orchiopexy for UDT (Pettersson et al.). TC incidence for boys undergoing orchiopexy for UDT was assessed based on the age at orchiopexy (0-6 years, 7-9 years, 10-12 years, 13-15 years). The incidence of TC in each age cohort was calculated and used to determine the number needed to treat (NNT) for each age group using assumptions based on published TC outcomes.
RESULTS: For an index patient ≤ 6 years, 372 boys need to undergo orchiopexy to prevent a single case of TC, 1488 boys to prevent exposure to TC therapy beyond radical orchiectomy, and 5315 boys to prevent a single TC-related death compared to treatment at an older age.
CONCLUSION: While there is evidence supporting benefits of early orchiopexy, the NNT to affect TC outcomes is very high. Even those with delayed orchiopexies have low risk for TC poor outcomes. This information can be used when counseling patients and families faced with UDT about the risks related to TC, especially with comorbidities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Number needed to treat; Orchiopexy; Testicular cancer; Undescended testicle

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31781896     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-03034-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  3 in total

Review 1.  Maldescendus testis.

Authors:  J Toppari; M Kaleva
Journal:  Horm Res       Date:  1999-12

2.  Cryptorchidism: aspects of fertility and neoplasms. A study including data of 1,335 consecutive boys who underwent testicular biopsy simultaneously with surgery for cryptorchidism.

Authors:  D Cortes; J M Thorup; J Visfeldt
Journal:  Horm Res       Date:  2001

3.  Prevalence and natural history of cryptorchidism.

Authors:  G S Berkowitz; R H Lapinski; S E Dolgin; J G Gazella; C A Bodian; I R Holzman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 7.124

  3 in total
  5 in total

1.  Performance of SOFA, qSOFA and SIRS to predict septic shock after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Yonghan Peng; Wei Zhang; Yalong Xu; Ling Li; Weixing Yu; Jianwen Zeng; Shaoxiong Ming; Ziyu Fang; Zeyu Wang; Xiaofeng Gao
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  The evaluation of early predictive factors for urosepsis in patients with negative preoperative urine culture following mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Zewu Zhu; Yu Cui; Huimin Zeng; Yongchao Li; Feng Zeng; Yang Li; Zhiyong Chen; Chen Hequn
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Reply letter to: Comments to "Systematic review and cumulative analysis of the managements for proximal impacted ureteral stones" by Gao ZY.

Authors:  Tuo Deng; Guohua Zeng
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Transverse testicular ectopia: two rare adult cases and a review of literature.

Authors:  Milap Shah; Aviansh Odugoudar; Arun Chawla; Zeeshan Bm Hameed
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2020-05-06

5.  Prospects and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence and Computer Science for the Future of Urology.

Authors:  Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola; Arkadiusz Miernik
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 4.226

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.