Aurianne Lauroy1, Caroline Verhaeghe2, Fabien Vidal1,3, Olivier Parant1,3, Guillaume Legendre2, Paul Guerby4,5. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Paule de Viguier Hospital, CHU Toulouse, 330, avenue de Grande-Bretagne TSA 70034, 31059, Toulouse, France. 2. Department of Gynecology-Obstetrics, CHU Angers, 49933, Angers Cedex, France. 3. University Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, Toulouse, France. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Paule de Viguier Hospital, CHU Toulouse, 330, avenue de Grande-Bretagne TSA 70034, 31059, Toulouse, France. paul.guerby@gmail.com. 5. University Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, Toulouse, France. paul.guerby@gmail.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of new bipolar vessel sealing system like LigaSure™ compared to the standard surgical technique (suture) during emergency peripartum hysterectomy (EPH). METHODS: A retrospective observational bicentric study was conducted from February 2005 to August 2018 in the maternity wards of the University Hospital of Toulouse and Angers. All EPHs performed up to 24 h after delivery were included. The main outcome was the total blood loss. Secondary outcomes were operating time, number of blood transfusions, per and postoperative complications. A subgroup analysis was performed between hysterectomies performed in emergency and scheduled hysterectomies. RESULTS: Among 111,266 deliveries, 86 women (0.07%) underwent EPH, 29 were operated upon with LigaSure™, 57 with the traditional technique. In the LigaSure™ arm, there were statistically lower blood loss (3198 mL vs 4223 mL, p = 0.02), fewer blood transfusions (62.1% vs 94.7%, p = 0.0003, confirmed in subgroup analysis), and fewer perioperative complications (8.3% vs 45.5%, p = 0.04) for scheduled hysterectomies. CONCLUSION: Bipolar vessel sealing systems such as LigaSure™ are a surgical instrument, easy to use for the surgeon, with an interest in the management of EPH, particularly for total blood loss, transfusions, and intraoperative complications.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of new bipolar vessel sealing system like LigaSure™ compared to the standard surgical technique (suture) during emergency peripartum hysterectomy (EPH). METHODS: A retrospective observational bicentric study was conducted from February 2005 to August 2018 in the maternity wards of the University Hospital of Toulouse and Angers. All EPHs performed up to 24 h after delivery were included. The main outcome was the total blood loss. Secondary outcomes were operating time, number of blood transfusions, per and postoperative complications. A subgroup analysis was performed between hysterectomies performed in emergency and scheduled hysterectomies. RESULTS: Among 111,266 deliveries, 86 women (0.07%) underwent EPH, 29 were operated upon with LigaSure™, 57 with the traditional technique. In the LigaSure™ arm, there were statistically lower blood loss (3198 mL vs 4223 mL, p = 0.02), fewer blood transfusions (62.1% vs 94.7%, p = 0.0003, confirmed in subgroup analysis), and fewer perioperative complications (8.3% vs 45.5%, p = 0.04) for scheduled hysterectomies. CONCLUSION:Bipolar vessel sealing systems such as LigaSure™ are a surgical instrument, easy to use for the surgeon, with an interest in the management of EPH, particularly for total blood loss, transfusions, and intraoperative complications.