Literature DB >> 31781832

Influence of the scan time point when assessing hypoxia in 18F-fluoromisonidazole PET: 2 vs. 4 h.

Kentaro Kobayashi1, Osamu Manabe1, Kenji Hirata2, Shigeru Yamaguchi3, Hiroyuki Kobayashi4, Shunsuke Terasaka4, Takuya Toyonaga5, Sho Furuya1, Keiichi Magota6, Yuji Kuge7, Kohsuke Kudo8,9, Tohru Shiga1, Nagara Tamaki10.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: 18F-fluoromisonidazole (18F-FMISO) is the most widely used positron emission tomography (PET) tracer for imaging tumor hypoxia. Previous reports suggested that the time from injection to the scan may affect the assessment of 18F-FMISO uptake. Herein, we directly compared the images at 2 h and 4 h after a single injection of 18F-FMISO.
METHODS: Twenty-three patients with or suspected of having a brain tumor were scanned twice at 2 and 4 h following an intravenous injection of 18F-FMISO. We estimated the mean standardized uptake value (SUV) of the gray matter and white matter and the gray-to-white matter ratio in the background brain tissue from the two scans. We also performed a semi-quantitative analysis using the SUVmax and maximum tumor-to-normal ratio (TNR) for the tumor.
RESULTS: At 2 h, the SUVmean of gray matter was significantly higher than that of white matter (median 1.23, interquartile range (IQR) 1.10-1.32 vs. 1.04, IQR 0.95-1.16, p < 0.0001), whereas at 4 h, it significantly decreased to approach that of the white matter (1.10, IQR 1.00-1.23 vs. 1.02, IQR 0.93-1.13, p = NS). The gray-to-white matter ratio thus significantly declined from 1.17 (IQR 1.14-1.19) to 1.09 (IQR 1.07-1.10) (p < 0.0001). All 7 patients with glioblastoma showed significant increases in the SUVmax (2.20, IQR 1.67-3.32 at 2 h vs. 2.65, IQR 1.74-4.41 at 4 h, p = 0.016) and the TNR (1.75, IQR 1.40-2.38 at 2 h vs. 2.34, IQR 1.67-3.60 at 4 h, p = 0.016).
CONCLUSION: In the assessment of hypoxic tumors, 18F-FMISO PET for hypoxia imaging should be obtained at 4 h rather than 2 h after the injection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fluoromisonidazole; Glioblastoma; Hypoxia; Positron emission tomography; Scan timing; This article is part of the Topical Collection on Oncology – Brain

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31781832     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-04626-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  4 in total

Review 1.  Potential novel imaging targets of inflammation in cardiac sarcoidosis.

Authors:  Jakob Park; Bryan D Young; Edward J Miller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 3.872

2.  Biological Guided Carbon-Ion Microporous Radiation to Tumor Hypoxia Area Triggers Robust Abscopal Effects as Open Field Radiation.

Authors:  Qingting Huang; Yun Sun; Weiwei Wang; Lien-Chun Lin; Yangle Huang; Jing Yang; Xiaodong Wu; Lin Kong; Jiade Jay Lu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Assessment of tumor hypoxia and perfusion in recurrent glioblastoma following bevacizumab failure using MRI and 18F-FMISO PET.

Authors:  Shiliang Huang; Joel E Michalek; David A Reardon; Patrick Y Wen; John R Floyd; Peter T Fox; Geoffrey D Clarke; Paul A Jerabek; Kathleen M Schmainda; Mark Muzi; Hyewon Hyun; Eudocia Quant Lee; Andrew J Brenner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Positron emission tomography molecular imaging-based cancer phenotyping.

Authors:  Chentao Jin; Xiaoyun Luo; Xiaoyi Li; Rui Zhou; Yan Zhong; Zhoujiao Xu; Chunyi Cui; Xiaoqing Xing; Hong Zhang; Mei Tian
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 6.921

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.