| Literature DB >> 31781604 |
Jing Zhu1,2, Mu Zhang1,2, Tingli Han3, Hua Wu4, Zhibo Xiao5, Shihui Lin1,2, Chuanjiang Wang1,2, Fang Xu1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) is a transient and reversible brain dysfunction, that occurs when the source of sepsis is located outside of the central nervous system; SAE affects nearly 30% of septic patients at admission and is a risk factor for mortality. In our study, we sought to determine whether metabolite changes in plasma could be a potential biomarker for the early diagnosis and/or the prediction of the prognosis of sepsis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31781604 PMCID: PMC6875220 DOI: 10.1155/2019/2612849
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1(a) The flow chart of our study. 47 septic patients and 44 paired healthy controls were in our study for metabolomic predetecting (total samples n = 91). Then, 31 out of 47 patients were diagnosed as SAE. According to the GCS, they were divided into 4 groups. (b) The PLS-DA of our study. (c) The leave-one-out cross-validation of our study.
Basic formation of groups.
| Groups | Numbers | Age | BMI | Gender | Apache II | Apache III | qSOFA | SOFA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GCS 15 | 8 | 67.25 ± 12.44 | 20.90 ± 2.96 | 5 : 3 | 19.5 ± 6.43 | 59.12 ± 15.51 | 1.37 ± 0.51 | 12 ± 4.53 |
| GCS 14∼12 | 5 | 72.80 ± 7.88 | 18.52 ± 1.64 | 4 : 1 | 29.2 ± 4.65 | 82.2 ± 27.52 | 1.8 ± 0.44 | 13.6 ± 4.97 |
| GCS 11∼9 | 5 | 68.80 ± 19.01 | 21.80 ± 3.36 | 2 : 3 | 25.8 ± 11.81 | 75.2 ± 25.60 | 1.8 ± 0.83 | 13.8 ± 3.63 |
| GCS 8∼3 | 13 | 69.69 ± 17.4852 | 24.08 ± 5.68 | 8 : 5 | 27 ± 9.44 | 76.61 ± 26.65 | 2.15 ± 0.80 | 13.53 ± 4.96 |
| Control A | 8 | 66.37 ± 12.56 | 21.10 ± 2.86 | 6 : 2 | — | — | — | — |
| Control B | 5 | 73.00 ± 7.90 | 19.76 ± 2.10 | 4 : 1 | — | — | — | — |
| Control C | 4 | 66.5 ± 17.40 | 20.52 ± 3.88 | 2 : 2 | — | — | — | — |
| Control D | 11 | 69.90 ± 16.98 | 21.87 ± 3.34 | 7 : 4 | — | — | — | — |
Control A is linked with the control of GCS 15. Control B is linked with the control of GCS 14∼12. Control C is linked with the control of GCS 11∼9. Control D is linked with the control of GCS 8∼3. The numbers were recorded as mean ± SD.
Figure 2(a) Metabolites' concentration gradient map after the ANOVA test. p < 0.05, comparison of each GCS degrees of SAE groups and control groups. The name of metabolites is showing at the left, and the degree of matching with the compound in the NIST was marked in the form of n% after the name of the metabolites. The classification of the metabolites is on the right. (b) The VIP score analysis of our study shows out the best 10 metabolites, showing changes in different groups. (c) The heatmap of 4 common metabolites.
Figure 3Concentration gradient map of metabolite pathways after the T test. p < 0.05, comparison of each SAE groups and control groups. The classifications of the pathways are on the right.