| Literature DB >> 31780996 |
Bianca Machado Borba Soll1, Angelo Brandelli Costa1,2, Anna Martha Vaitses Fontanari1, Ítala Raymundo Chinazzo1, Dhiordan Cardoso da Silva1, Karine Schwarz1, Maiko Abel Schneider1,3, Cesar Augusto Nunes Bridi Filho1, Claudia Garcia de Garcia1, André Real1, Silza Tramontina1, Maria Inês Rodrigues Lobato1.
Abstract
The present study explores data collected in the psychological evaluation of transgender youth and their families who seek healthcare at the Gender Identity Program. Great psychosocial changes mark the transition from infancy to adulthood. Transgender youth may have these aspects of their developmental stage potentialized. A study was conducted with 23 transgender youth (mean age = 14 ± 2.38 years) and their caregivers. Eleven of the youngsters were assigned male at birth, while 12 were assigned female. The research protocol consisted of a survey and systematization of the data collected in the initial global psychological evaluation performed at the healthcare facility, including house-tree-person (HTP) projective drawings and the parental styles inventory. The present study aimed to explore the data collected during the psychological evaluation of youngsters diagnosed with gender incongruence, relating the HTP projective drawing technique to parental styles and gender trajectories. The results indicate two key points. One evidenced that parental styles could be either preventive or risk components in maintaining adequate socialization in these young people but not in affecting the level of gender dysphoria. The other was that coherence is introduced in the person's perception of his or her projected self-image and his or her expressed gender as he/she becomes more comfortable in expressing his/her gender identity. Treating youngsters inherently brings ethical issues to clinical practice. Thus, global psychological evaluation tailored to this population is a fundamental resource that the psychology professional can use in consultations with youngsters because this tool brings a global understanding about the natural development cycle, facilitating the formulation of therapeutic conducts and exchanges within interdisciplinary transgender health care teams.Entities:
Keywords: gender dysphoria; gender incongruence; house-tree-person projective drawings; parental styles; psychological evaluation; transgender youth
Year: 2019 PMID: 31780996 PMCID: PMC6861324 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02488
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Figure 1Drawing of a house in HTP.
Demographic characteristics of the caregivers.
| Mother | Father | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Uncompleted elementary school | 3 (14.3) | — | 3 (8.8) |
| Employed | 14 (66.7) | 12 (92.3) | 26 (74.3) |
Parental styles inventory (PIS) results.
| Mother parental styles | Father parental styles | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Great parental style | 38.1 (8) | 7.7 (1) | 9 |
| Regular parental style above average | 4.8 (1) | 15.4 (2) | 3 |
| Regular parental style below average | 28.6 (6) | 30.8 (4) | 10 |
| Risk parental style | 28.6 (6) | 46.2 (6) | 12 |
Stages of the gender trajectory.
| Transgender youth | Mean age (years) | Minimum–maximum (years) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Confusion and increasing sense of gender difference | 17.4 (4) | 11.25 | 9–13 |
| Finding an explanation and a label: exploring identity | 26.0 (6) | 15.16 | 13–16 |
| Deciding what to do and when: exploring options | 39.1 (9) | 14.4 | 8–16 |
| Embracing gender identity | 17.4 (4) | 14.0 | 11–16 |
| Identity consolidation and invisibility | — | — | — |
Figure 2Drawing of person in HTP. Inquiry: Outside it is always very hot, and so it is common to sweat a little.
Associations between parental style and HTP positive indexes, psychological distress related to gender incongruity and loss in social functioning.
| Mother parental styles | Father parental styles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social withdrawal | 15 (71.4) | 0.574 | 10 (76.9) | 0.238 |
| Attachment security | 15 (71.4) | 0.884 | 8 (61.5) | 0.361 |
| Insecurity with self-image | 18 (85.7) | 1.000 | 11 (84.6) | 0.244 |
| Feeling of physical inadequacy | 15 (71.4) | 0.574 | 9 (69.2) | 0.099 |
| Distress related to gender incongruity | 21 (100) | 0.101 | 13 (100) | 0.179 |
| Absence from their studies | 8 (38.1) | 0.028 | 3 (23.1) | 1.000 |
Correlation is significant at the 0.5 level;
Fisher exact test.