| Literature DB >> 31780893 |
Yanqiu Zhang1,2,3,4, Wei Li1,2,3,5, Zuhong He2,6, Yunfeng Wang7,8, Buwei Shao2, Cheng Cheng1,2,3, Shasha Zhang2, Mingliang Tang2, Xiaoyun Qian1, Weijia Kong6, Hui Wang9, Renjie Chai2,3,7,10,11,12, Xia Gao1,3.
Abstract
Ototoxic drug-induced hair cell (HC) damage is one of the main causes of sensorineural hearing loss, which is one of the most common sensory disorders in humans. Aminoglycoside antibiotics are common ototoxic drugs, and these can cause the accumulation of intracellular oxygen free radicals and lead to apoptosis in HCs. Fasudil is a Rho kinase inhibitor and vasodilator that has been widely used in the clinic and has been shown to have neuroprotective effects. However, the possible application of fasudil in protecting against aminoglycoside-induced HC loss and hearing loss has not been investigated. In this study, we investigated the ability of fasudil to protect against neomycin-induced HC loss both in vitro and in vivo. We found that fasudil significantly reduced the HC loss in cochlear whole-organ explant cultures and reduced the cell death of auditory HEI-OC1 cells after neomycin exposure in vitro. Moreover, we found that fasudil significantly prevented the HC loss and hearing loss of mice in the in vivo neomycin damage model. Furthermore, we found that fasudil could significantly inhibit the Rho signaling pathway in the auditory HEI-OC1 cells after neomycin exposure, thus further reducing the neomycin-induced accumulation of reactive oxygen species and subsequent apoptosis in HEI-OC1 cells. This study suggests that fasudil might contribute to the increased viability of HCs after neomycin exposure by inhibition of the Rho signaling pathway and suggests a new therapeutic target for the prevention of aminoglycoside-induced HC loss and hearing loss.Entities:
Keywords: aminoglycoside; fasudil; hair cell; ototoxic; reactive oxygen species; rho signaling pathway
Year: 2019 PMID: 31780893 PMCID: PMC6851027 DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2019.00264
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Mol Neurosci ISSN: 1662-5099 Impact factor: 5.639
Figure 1Fasudil promoted HEI-OC1 cells survival after neomycin exposure. (A) The number of live cells after neomycin exposure was measured with the CCK-8 kit after pretreatment with different fasudil concentrations (0.001 μM, 0.005 μM, 0.01 μM, 0.05 μM, 0.1 μM, 0.5 μM, and 1 μM) for different times (24 h, 48 h, and 72 h). (B) CCK-8 result of HEI-OC1 cells pre-treated with different fasudil concentrations for 24 h after neomycin exposure. (C) CCK-8 result of HEI-OC1 cells pre-treated with different fasudil concentrations for 48 h after neomycin exposure. (D) CCK-8 result of HEI-OC1 cells pre-treated with different fasudil concentrations for 72 h after neomycin exposure. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 2Fasudil promoted hair cell (HC) survival in the cochlea after neomycin exposure. (A) Immunofluorescence staining with the anti-Myo7a antibody in the apical turn of the cochlea after different treatments. (B) Immunofluorescence staining with the anti-Myo7a antibody in the middle turn of the cochlea after different treatments. (C) Immunofluorescence staining with the anti-Myo7a antibody in the basal turn of the cochlea after different treatments. (D) Quantification of the number of Myo7a-positive cells per 150 μM of the cochlea in (A–C). ***p < 0.001.
Figure 3Fasudil promoted HC survival in the cochlea after neomycin exposure. (A) The three different treatment groups. Control mice were injected with normal saline from P8 until P30, mice in the neomycin group were subcutaneously injected with neomycin (200 mg/kg/day) from P8 to P14, and mice in the fasudil treatment group were intraperitoneally injected with fasudil (2 mg/kg/day) from P6 to P7 and co-treated with neomycin from P8 to P14. (B) The results showed that the hearing threshold of P30 mice increased after neomycin treatment and was reduced by fasudil. (C) Immunofluorescence staining with the anti-Myo7a antibody in the apical turn of the cochlea after different treatments. (D) Immunofluorescence staining with the anti-Myo7a antibody in the middle turn of the cochlea after different treatments. (E) Immunofluorescence staining with the anti-Myo7a antibody in the basal turn of the cochlea after different treatments. (F) Quantification of the number of Myo7a-positive cells per 150 μM of the cochlea in (A–C). *represents Control vs 200 mg/kg Neomycin, #represents Control vs 5 mg/kg FS + 200 mg/kg Neomycin, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, #p < 0.05, ###p < 0.001.
Figure 4The effect of fasudil (FS) on neomycin-induced HEI-OC1 cell apoptosis. (A) Images of HEI-OC1 cells stained with Annexin V (green) and propidium iodide (PI, red). (B) Apoptosis analysis by flow cytometry after different treatments. (C,D) The proportions of early apoptotic and death cells in (B). (E) TUNEL and DAPI double staining showing the apoptotic HEI-OC1 cells after different treatments. (F) Cleaved-CASP3 and DAPI double staining showing the apoptotic HEI-OC1 cells after different treatments. (G) Quantification of the numbers of TUNEL/DAPI double-positive cells in (D). (H) Quantification of the numbers of TUNEL/DAPI double-positive cells in (E). **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 5Changes in apoptosis-related protein and gene expression after neomycin and fasudil (FS) treatment. (A) Western blots with anti-cleaved-CASP3 antibody and anti-cleaved-CASP9 antibody showed that the neomycin-induced increase in cleaved-CASP3 and cleaved-CASP9 was largely attenuated by pretreatment with fasudil. (B,C) Quantification of the western blot in (A). (D) The mRNA levels of pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic genes were analyzed by qPCR. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 6Fasudil maintains the mitochondrial membrane potential after neomycin exposure. (A) HEI-OC-1 cells were labeled using the MitoTracker Red CMXRos staining kit. (B) The analysis of mitochondrial membrane potential by flow cytometry. (C) Quantification of the data in (B). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 7The changes in ROS levels in HEI-OC-1 cells after neomycin and fasudil (FS) treatment. (A) Three different groups of HEI-OC-1 cells were labeled using the DCFH-DA staining kit. (B) Flow cytometry data confirmed the results in (A). (C) Quantification of the data in (B). ***p < 0.001.
Figure 8Differential expression analysis of Rho signaling pathway-related genes in HEI-OC1 cell after different treatment. (A–D) The mRNA levels of Rock1, Mapk8, c-jun, and c-fos. The values of each group are relative values, and the value of controls is set to 1. (E) The protein levels of JNK, ROCK1, and c-jun. (F–H) Quantification of the western blot in (E). Analysis of the ratio of the target protein to the control protein in each sample. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.