| Literature DB >> 31779661 |
Xiao Rong1, Suraj Dahal1, Ze-Yu Luo1, Kai Zhou1, Shun-Yu Yao1, Zong-Ke Zhou2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Performing total joint arthroplasty (TJA) in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients may encounter a higher complication rate or worse functional outcomes compared with common patients. The relationship between PD and clinical outcomes after TJA is not fully understood.Entities:
Keywords: Functional outcomes; Parkinson’s disease; Total joint arthroplasty
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31779661 PMCID: PMC6883575 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1447-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Hoehn and Yahr Scale for Parkinson’s disease
| Stage | Hoehn and Yahr Scale |
|---|---|
| I | Unilateral involvement only |
| II | Bilateral involvement without impairment of balance |
| III | Mild to moderate bilateral disease; some postural instability; physically independent |
| IV | Severe disability; still able to walk or stand unassisted |
| V | Wheelchair bound or bedridden unless aided |
Baseline characteristics and Hoehn and Yahr stage
| Variables | THA group | TKA group |
|---|---|---|
| Number of patients | 24 | 18 |
| Number of hips | 28 | 22 |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 8 (33.33%) | 3 (16.67%) |
| Female | 16 (66.67%) | 15 (83.33%) |
| Weight (kg), mean ± SD | 54.73 ± 10.12 | 59.09 ± 9.96 |
| Height (cm), mean ± SD | 158.04 ± 6.89 | 157.28 ± 7.43 |
| BMI, mean ± SD | 21.91 ± 3.82 | 23.83 ± 3.25 |
| Age, mean (range) | 64.67 ± 10.69 (47–80) | 67.89 ± 6.62 (56–85) |
| Follow-up (months), median (IQR) | 51.50 (34.00–72.00) | 38.00 (29.75–50.75) |
| Side | ||
| Left | 15 (53.57%) | 11 (50.00%) |
| Right | 13 (46.43%) | 11 (50.00%) |
| Hoehn and Yahr stage | ||
| I | 7 (29.17%) | 2 (11.11%) |
| II | 5 (20.83%) | 7 (38.89%) |
| III | 8 (33.33%) | 5 (27.78%) |
| IV | 3 (12.50%) | 4 (22.22%) |
| V | 1 (4.15%) | 0 |
Abbreviations: THA total hip arthroplasty, TKA total knee arthroplasty, SD standard deviation, BMI body mass index, IQR interquartile range
Clinical outcomes from patients
| Variable mean ± SD | THA group, | TKA group, | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperative | Postoperative | Preoperative | Postoperative | |||
| HHS | ||||||
| Pain | 18.75 ± 9.92 | 38.83 ± 9.26 | < 0.01 | – | – | – |
| Function | 18.08 ± 7.17 | 28.83 ± 13.10 | < 0.01 | – | – | – |
| Deformity | 2.17 ± 0.92 | 3.73 ± 0.44 | < 0.01 | – | – | – |
| Total | 39.00 ± 15.74 | 71.39 ± 19.18 | < 0.01 | – | – | – |
| KSS | ||||||
| Pain | – | – | – | 21.11 ± 9.63 | 43.61 ± 12.10 | < 0.01 |
| ROM | – | – | – | 22.22 ± 1.86 | 23.61 ± 1.61 | < 0.01 |
| Stability | – | – | – | 17.89 ± 2.00 | 24.11 ± 1.18 | < 0.01 |
| Total | – | – | – | 61.22 ± 9.66 | 91.33 ± 12.57 | < 0.01 |
| KSFS | – | – | – | 39.72 ± 6.52 | 58.06 ± 31.11 | 0.02 |
| SF-12 | ||||||
| PCS | 13.96 ± 2.54 | 17.54 ± 6.09 | 0.01 | 15.61 ± 3.55 | 20.17 ± 5.08 | < 0.01 |
| MCS | 17.96 ± 2.82 | 21.41 ± 6.25 | 0.02 | 20.28 ± 3.49 | 24.00 ± 5.16 | 0.02 |
| WOMAC | ||||||
| Pain | 10.63 ± 3.51 | 2.96 ± 4.13 | < 0.01 | 8.39 ± 2.55 | 3.39 ± 4.55 | < 0.01 |
| Stiffness | 4.25 ± 1.85 | 1.75 ± 1.85 | < 0.01 | 2.94 ± 1.30 | 0.61 ± 1.50 | < 0.01 |
| Function | 44.08 ± 7.90 | 34.63 ± 15.52 | < 0.01 | 38.00 ± 6.73 | 26.44 ± 15.24 | < 0.01 |
| ROM | ||||||
| Flexion | 70.42 ± 40.59 | 111.13 ± 15.16 | < 0.01 | 111.11 ± 9.32 | 118.33 ± 8.22 | < 0.01 |
| Abduction | 21.88 ± 16.93 | 38.29 ± 6.21 | < 0.01 | – | – | – |
Abbreviations: SD standard deviation, THA Total hip arthroplasty, TKA total knee arthroplasty, HHS Harris Hip Score, KSS Knee Society Score, KSFS Knee Society Function Score, SF-12 Short Form (12) Health Survey scale, PCS physical component summary, MCS mental component summary, WOMAC Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, ROM range of motion
Complications
| Complications | THA group | TKA group |
|---|---|---|
| Intraoperative fracture | 1 (3.57%) | 0 |
| Gastrointestinal disorder | 1 (3.57%) | 2 (9.09%) |
| Lower limb swelling | 0 | 1 (4.55%) |
| Bruise | 2 (7.14%) | 3 (13.64%) |
| Upper respiratory infection | 2 (7.14%) | 1 (4.55%) |
| Delirium | 1 (3.57%) | 1 (4.55%) |
| Anemia | 1 (3.57%) | 0 |
| Embolism | 0 | 0 |
| Hematoma | 0 | 0 |
| Nerve palsy | 0 | 0 |
Abbreviations: THA total hip arthroplasty, TKA total knee arthroplasty
Fig. 1A Kaplan-Meier survivorship cure for THA and TKA group
Subgroup clinical outcomes comparison
| Variables mean ± SD | THA | TKA | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group I, | Group II, | Group I, | Group II, | |||
| HHS | ||||||
| Total | 79.58 ± 13.94 | 63.21 ± 20.71 | 0.03 | – | – | – |
| Pain | 41.5 ± 4.10 | 36.17 ± 12.13 | 0.16 | – | – | – |
| Deformity | 3.75 ± 0.45 | 3.71 ± 0.45 | 0.82 | – | – | – |
| Function | 34.33 ± 11.42 | 23.33 ± 12.74 | 0.03 | – | – | – |
| KSS | ||||||
| Pain | – | – | – | 47.78 ± 3.63 | 39.44 ± 16.09 | 0.15 |
| ROM | – | – | – | 24.33 ± 0.71 | 22.89 ± 1.96 | 0.05 |
| Stability | – | – | – | 24.56 ± 0.88 | 23.67 ± 1.32 | 0.11 |
| Total | – | – | – | 96.78 ± 3.53 | 86.00 ± 16.12 | 0.07 |
| KSFS | – | – | – | 81.11 ± 14.53 | 35.00 ± 25.50 | < 0.01 |
| SF-12 | ||||||
| PCS | 20.42 ± 5.21 | 14.67 ± 5.69 | 0.02 | 22.78 ± 3.07 | 17.56 ± 5.48 | 0.02 |
| MCS | 25.92 ± 3.99 | 16.92 ± 4.64 | < 0.01 | 27.00 ± 2.06 | 21.00 ± 5.66 | 0.01 |
| WOMAC | ||||||
| Pain | 1.83 ± 2.72 | 4.08 ± 5.05 | 0.19 | 1.11 ± 1.27 | 5.67 ± 5.55 | 0.03 |
| Stiffness | 1.33 ± 1.72 | 2.17 ± 1.95 | 0.28 | 0.33 ± 0.71 | 1.00 ± 2.00 | 0.36 |
| Function | 25.83 ± 12.88 | 43.42 ± 13.01 | < 0.01 | 16.22 ± 9.96 | 36.67 ± 12.61 | < 0.01 |
| ROM | ||||||
| Flexion | 115.91 ± 12.13 | 106.33 ± 16.82 | 0.12 | 24.33 ± 0.71 | 22.89 ± 1.96 | 0.05 |
| Abduction | 40.42 ± 5.42 | 36.17 ± 6.43 | 0.09 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Abbreviations: SD standard deviation, THA total hip arthroplasty, TKA total knee arthroplasty, HHS Harris Hip Score, KSS Knee Society Score, KSFS Knee Society Function Score, SF-12 Short Form (12) Health Survey scale, PCS physical component summary, MCS mental component summary, WOMAC Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, ROM range of motion.
Fig. 2Scatter diagram and the fitted lines of functional outcomes and H-Y stages. a Correlation between SF-12 score and H-Y stages. b Correlation between WOMAC Function score and H-Y stages. c Correlation between HHS Function score of THA patients and H-Y stages. d Correlation between KSFS of TKA patients and H-Y stages