Literature DB >> 31779499

Estimating Representative Group Intrinsic Circadian Period from Illuminance-Response Curve Data.

Nora Stack1, Jamie M Zeitzer2,3, Charles Czeisler4,5, Cecilia Diniz Behn1,6.   

Abstract

The human circadian pacemaker entrains to the 24-h day, but interindividual differences in properties of the pacemaker, such as intrinsic period, affect chronotype and mediate responses to challenges to the circadian system, such as shift work and jet lag, and the efficacy of therapeutic interventions such as light therapy. Robust characterization of circadian properties requires desynchronization of the circadian system from the rest-activity cycle, and these forced desynchrony protocols are very time and resource intensive. However, circadian protocols designed to derive the relationship between light intensity and phase shift, which is inherently affected by intrinsic period, may be applied more broadly. To exploit this relationship, we applied a mathematical model of the human circadian pacemaker with a Markov-Chain Monte Carlo parameter estimation algorithm to estimate the representative group intrinsic period for a group of participants using their collective illuminance-response curve data. We first validated this methodology using simulated illuminance-response curve data in which the intrinsic period was known. Over a physiological range of intrinsic periods, this method accurately estimated the representative intrinsic period of the group. We also applied the method to previously published experimental data describing the illuminance-response curve for a group of healthy adult participants. We estimated the study participants' representative group intrinsic period to be 24.26 and 24.27 h using uniform and normal priors, respectively, consistent with estimates of the average intrinsic period of healthy adults determined using forced desynchrony protocols. Our results establish an approach to estimate a population's representative intrinsic period from illuminance-response curve data, thereby facilitating the characterization of intrinsic period across a broader range of participant populations than could be studied using forced desynchrony protocols. Future applications of this approach may improve the understanding of demographic differences in the intrinsic circadian period.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MCMC; circadian; human; intrinsic period; mathematical model; oscillator; parameter estimation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31779499      PMCID: PMC9363110          DOI: 10.1177/0748730419886992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Rhythms        ISSN: 0748-7304            Impact factor:   3.649


  39 in total

1.  Exogenous and endogenous components in circadian rhythms.

Authors:  J ASCHOFF
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1960

2.  Probing the mechanisms of chronotype using quantitative modeling.

Authors:  A J K Phillips; P Y Chen; P A Robinson
Journal:  J Biol Rhythms       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.182

Review 3.  Hypothalamic regulation of sleep and circadian rhythms.

Authors:  Clifford B Saper; Thomas E Scammell; Jun Lu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Effective implementation of work-hour limits and systemic improvements.

Authors:  Christopher P Landrigan; Charles A Czeisler; Laura K Barger; Najib T Ayas; Jeffrey M Rothschild; Steven W Lockley
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2007-11

5.  Daily electrical silencing in the mammalian circadian clock.

Authors:  Mino D C Belle; Casey O Diekman; Daniel B Forger; Hugh D Piggins
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Influence of light at night on melatonin suppression in children.

Authors:  Shigekazu Higuchi; Yuki Nagafuchi; Sang-il Lee; Tetsuo Harada
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 7.  Phase relations between a circadian rhythm and its zeitgeber within the range of entrainment.

Authors:  J Aschoff; H Pohl
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1978-02

8.  Stability, precision, and near-24-hour period of the human circadian pacemaker.

Authors:  C A Czeisler; J F Duffy; T L Shanahan; E N Brown; J F Mitchell; D W Rimmer; J M Ronda; E J Silva; J S Allan; J S Emens; D J Dijk; R E Kronauer
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-06-25       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Sensitivity of the human circadian pacemaker to nocturnal light: melatonin phase resetting and suppression.

Authors:  J M Zeitzer; D J Dijk; R Kronauer; E Brown; C Czeisler
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Racial differences in the human endogenous circadian period.

Authors:  Mark R Smith; Helen J Burgess; Louis F Fogg; Charmane I Eastman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.