| Literature DB >> 31778919 |
Abdur Rashid1, Abida Farooqi2, Xubo Gao3, Salman Zahir4, Sifat Noor4, Junaid Ali Khattak4.
Abstract
The present study examined the hydrogeochemical profile of higher fluoride (F─) in groundwater of mixed industrial and mining areas of Dargai, northern Pakistan. Groundwater samples (n = 75) were collected from three hydrogeochemical environments. The mean concentrations of pH, EC, TDS, Depth and Temperature were (7.6, 1081 μS/cm, 590 mg/L, 75 m, 28.03 °C), for chemical ions viz. NO3, PO4, SO4, Cl, HCO3, Na, K, Ca and Mg were (18.5, 2.7, 161, 107, 330, 150, 9.76, 33, 52) mg/L respectively. Whereas, the mean concentration of F─ was 2.0 mg/L. Therefore, 51% groundwater samples exceeded the WHO guideline of F─ 1.5 mg/L. Additionally, we measured the mean F─ concentration in rocks, coal and wastewater, which were (670, 98) mg/Kg and 2.3 mg/L respectively. The principal component analysis multilinear regression (PCA─MLR) extracted five significant factors which shows natural, mixed and anthropogenic pollution. Thus, fluorite is the primary source of F─ contamination in groundwater. While apatite, biotite and muscovite minerals are the secondary sources which occurs in association with quartzite, granite rocks. Under alkaline conditions, F─ contamination is supported by higher Na+, HCO3─ and lower Ca++ concentrations. The accuracy and reproducibility of the measurement of fluoride was assessed by adopting a standard method of water. The percentage recovery of F─ was 97% and reproducibility was within ±5% error limit. Lastly, a health risk community fluorosis index (CFI) was calculated through Dean's formula which shows unsuitability of groundwater sources conceiving community fluorosis in the entire study area.Entities:
Keywords: Geochemical modeling; Groundwater fluoride; Health perspective; Ion exchange method; Source apportionment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31778919 DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125409
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chemosphere ISSN: 0045-6535 Impact factor: 7.086