Literature DB >> 31778605

The global prevalence of dental healthcare needs and unmet dental needs among adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mahin Ghafari1, Samira Bahadivand-Chegini2, Tayebeh Nadi2, Amin Doosti-Irani2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Access to dental healthcare services is a major determinant of dental health in communities. This meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the global prevalence of dental needs and of unmet dental needs in adolescents.
METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched in June 2018. The summary measures included the prevalence of met and unmet dental needs. A meta-analysis was performed using the inverse variance method to obtain pooled summary measures. Out of 41,661 retrieved articles, 57 were ultimately included.
RESULTS: The pooled prevalence of orthodontic treatment needs was 46.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 38.0 to 53.0), that of general treatment needs was 59.0% (95% CI, 42.0 to 75.0), that of periodontal treatment needs was 71.0% (95% CI, 46.0 to 96.0), and that of malocclusion treatment needs was 39.0% (95% CI, 28.0 to 50.0). The pooled prevalence of unmet dental needs was 34.0% (95% CI, 27.0 to 40.0).
CONCLUSIONS: The highest and lowest prevalence of unmet dental needs were found in Southeast Asia and Europe, respectively. The prevalence of dental needs was higher in the countries of the Americas and Europe than in other World Health Organization (WHO) regions. The prevalence of unmet dental needs was higher in Southeast Asia and Africa than in other WHO regions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent; Dental health services; Meta-analysis; Prevalence

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31778605      PMCID: PMC6883027          DOI: 10.4178/epih.e2019046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiol Health        ISSN: 2092-7193


INTRODUCTION

Access to dental healthcare services is a major determinant of dental health in communities. Dental problems, including dental cavities, are most prevalent among adolescents [1]. The global weighted means of decayed, missing, and filled teeth for adolescents aged 12 years old in 2011 and 2015 were 1.67 and 1.86, respectively [2]. In 2010, approximately 2.4 billion people and 621 million children were affected by untreated caries in permanent and deciduous teeth, respectively, and untreated caries in permanent teeth was the most prevalent dental condition worldwide [3]. In the USA, it was reported that 21% of children aged 6-11 years and 58% of adolescents aged 12-19 years had experienced dental caries. In 2011-2012, the prevalence of untreated dental caries was about 6.0% in children and 15.3% in adolescents [4]. Untreated dental cavities have been reported to cause severe pain, infection, and problems with eating, speaking, and learning in children and adolescents [1]. Adolescents constitute a noteworthy age group, as they have specific healthcare needs [5]. Dental healthcare is an important need in this group, given its effects on quality of life and its potential to improve general health. Dental problems remain a huge burden in children and adolescents in certain regions of the world [6]; nevertheless, the prevalence of dental needs in these age groups has not been estimated in some communities [7,8]. Unmet healthcare needs have been defined as the difference between the healthcare services required to cope with a health problem and the services received [9]. Unmet healthcare needs are common in adolescents and are an independent risk factor for health outcomes in adults [10], meaning that they can impose heavy costs on the community, health system, and individuals [7]. Unmet dental needs in adolescents can have consequences that affect quality of life in adulthood. Several studies have been published regarding the prevalence of needs and unmet needs for dental healthcare. However, there are discrepancies in the results of the published studies. The present systematic review and meta-analysis was therefore conducted to estimate the global prevalence of dental needs and unmet dental needs in adolescents by the type of dental care, World Health Organization (WHO) region, and sex.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The design of this study is a systematic review and meta-analysis. As part of a comprehensive systematic review, the present review was conducted to determine the prevalence of dental healthcare needs and unmet dental needs in adolescents. This systematic review was conducted and reported according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) [11] (Supplementary Material 1).

Eligibility criteria

The present review included all retrieved cross-sectional studies that were conducted to estimate dental healthcare needs and unmet dental needs in adolescents. The studies included were not limited regarding the year, location, or language of the study, the sex and race of adolescents studied, or the type of dental health needs and unmet needs studied. According to the WHO, adolescents include individuals aged 10-19 years [12]. Unmet needs were defined as the difference between the healthcare needs present and the healthcare needs that were fulfilled to address the health problems under consideration [9].

Identifying the relevant studies

The international databases PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched in June 2018. The keywords used for searching PubMed were as follows: (adolescent [MeSH Terms] OR “teen” [Text Word] OR homeless youth [MeSH Terms] OR “street adolescents” [Text Word]) AND (health services needs and demand [MeSH Terms] OR “unmet needs” [Text Word] OR needs assessment [MeSH Terms] OR “health needs” [Text Word] OR “unmet health needs” [Text Word] OR “health service needs” [Text Word] OR “delay medical care” [Text Word]) AND (oral health [MeSH Terms] OR dental health services [MeSH Terms]). In Web of Science and Scopus, we searched the mentioned keywords as the topic (TS) and TITLE-ABS-KEY, respectively.

Data extraction and assessing the risk of bias

Endnote X7 software was used to the manage the results of our initial search. Two authors (TN and SBC) were in charge of screening the titles and abstracts of the studies obtained from the databases. The full texts of the selected studies were then evaluated based on the eligibility criteria. Any disagreements between the investigators were resolved through discussion and consultation with a third author (ADI). The kappa value for agreement between two authors in the screening of the title and abstract was 84%. Three authors (TN, SBC, and ADI) were responsible for data extraction. The data extracted from the included studies comprised the name of the first author, the year of publication, the location (country) of the study, the type of study population, the sex and mean/median age of participants, the type of health need(s) and unmet need(s), the sample size, the number of participants with health needs, and the number of participants with unmet health needs. Two authors (TN and SBC) were in charge of quality assessments. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist was used for evaluating the studies that reported prevalence rates and for assessing the risk of bias [13]. The items selected from the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist included (1) the appropriateness of the sampling frame in terms of addressing the target population, (2) the appropriateness of the sampling method, (3) the adequacy of the sample size, (4) the provision of a detailed description of the subjects and the study setting, (5) the use of a valid method for identifying the outcomes (i.e., dental needs and unmet dental needs), (6) the appropriateness of the statistical analysis, and (7) the adequacy of the response rate and the appropriate management of a potential low rate.

Statistical analysis

The chi-square test was used to examine heterogeneity among the results of the included studies. Between-study variance was assessed using the tau-square test, and the I-square statistic was used to quantify heterogeneity [14]. The summary measures, including the prevalence of dental healthcare needs and unmet dental needs, were extracted from the included studies, and their standard errors were calculated. Meta-analysis was performed using the inverse variance method to obtain the pooled summary measure. In the cases of out-of-range confidence intervals (CIs) in the subgroup analysis, the metaprop command was used. A random-effects model was also applied. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. The data were analyzed in Review Manager 5.3 (Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark) and Stata version 11 (StataCorp., College Station, TX, USA).

Ethics statement

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences (IR.UMSHA.RES.1397.69).

RESULTS

Included studies

Out of the 41,661 studies retrieved from searching the international databases and 62 found from scanning the references of the selected studies, 57 studies [15-71] were ultimately included in this systematic review (Figure 1). A study by Al-Sarheed et al. [22] was divided into 3 studies for the purposes of this analysis because it reported dental healthcare needs in 3 groups of adolescents: the general population, visually-impaired adolescents, and adolescents with hearing loss. Table 1 presents the characteristics of the included studies, which included 167,316 adolescents who were evaluated in terms of their dental healthcare needs and 123,821 who were evaluated in terms of their unmet dental healthcare needs. Results of the risk of bias assessment are shown in the forest plots in Figures 2-4.
Figure 1.

Flowchart depicting the stages through which articles were retrieved and eligibility criteria were checked for the meta-analysis.

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies

StudyCountryWHO regionStudy populationAge (yr)SexSample size (n)NeedUnmetType of dental health need(s)
Bilgic et al., 2015 [26]TurkeySoutheast AsiaGeneral12-16Both2,250648Orthodontic treatment
DHC
Bolin et al., 2006 [29]USAAmericasAdolescents in a juvenile detention facility12-17Both419310208Overall dental treatment needs
Dental caries
Vignarajah, 1994 [71]Antigua and BarbudaAmericasGeneral12-19Both702494Periodontal treatment needs
De Baets et al., 2012 [37]BelgiumEuropeanGeneral11-16Female223180Orthodontic treatment
DHC
Agaku et al., 2015 [16]USAAmericasGeneral6-17Both65,59310,338Overall dental treatment needs
Appropriate and timely preventive or therapeutic dental healthcare
Kulkami et al., 2002 [49]IndiaSoutheast AsiaGeneral11-15Both20051,159Overall dental treatment needs
Dental caries
Ajayi et al., 2010 [17]NigeriaAfricanGeneral12-19Both1,532165135Traumatized treatment
Traumatized anterior teeth
Ghijselings et al., 2014 [44]BelgiumEuropeanGeneral11-16Both386310Orthodontic treatment
DHC
Al-Haddad et al., 2010 [18]YemenEastern MediterraneanGeneral6-14Both1,4891,253Overall dental treatment needs
Nagarajappa et al., 2012 [56]IndiaSoutheast AsiaGeneral12-15Both900740Periodontal treatment needs
Al-Huwaizi et al., 2009 [20]IraqEastern MediterraneanGeneral13Both998413Orthodontic treatment
DAI
Bissar et al., 2007 [28]GermanyEuropeanGeneral11-13Both5025138Overall dental treatment needs
Restorative treatment need
Otuyemi et al., 1997 [60]NigeriaAfricanGeneral12-18Both704271Orthodontic treatment
DHC
Rubin et al., 2016 [63]UgandaAfricanGeneral5-17Female153151Overall dental treatment needs
Borzabadi-Farahani et al., 2009 [30]IranEastern MediterraneanGeneral11-14Both496281Orthodontic treatment
DHC
Alonge et al., 1999 [21]Saint Vincent and the GrenadinesAmericasGeneral7-15Both1,646662Periodontal treatment needs
Safavi et al., 2009 [65]IranEastern MediterraneanGeneral14-16Both5,0914,079Orthodontic treatment
DHC
Burden et al., 1994 [31]Northern IrelandEuropeanGeneral15-16Both50615482Orthodontic treatment
Salinas-Martínez et al., 2014 [66]MexicoAmericasGeneral13Both301223Overall dental treatment needs
Al-Sarheed et al., 2003 [22]Saudi ArabiaEastern MediterraneanVisually impaired adolescents11-16Both7721Orthodontic treatment
DHC
Al-Sarheed et al., 2003 [22]Saudi ArabiaEastern MediterraneanHearing-impaired adolescents11-16Both21062Orthodontic treatment
DHC
Al-Sarheed et al., 2003 [22]Saudi ArabiaEastern MediterraneanGeneral11-16Both494108Orthodontic treatment
DHC
Carvalho et al., 2013 [34]BrazilAmericasGeneral12-14Both300198Overall dental treatment needs
Dental caries
Danaei et al., 2007 [35]IranEastern MediterraneanGeneral12-15Both900269Orthodontic treatment
DAI
Dandi et al., 2011 [36]IndiaSoutheast AsiaGeneral12Both2,2031,5731,137Overall dental treatment needs
Dental pain
Artun et al., 2006 [23]KuwaitEastern MediterraneanGeneral13-14Both1,583330290Orthodontic treatment
El-Angbawi et al., 1982 [38]Saudi ArabiaEastern MediterraneanGeneral13-15Both1,1741,092Periodontal treatment needs
Baubiniene et al., 2009 [25]LithuaniaEuropeanGeneral10-15Male4,2351,806Orthodontic treatment
Eslamipour et al., 2010 [40]IranEastern MediterraneanGeneral11-20Both748331Orthodontic treatment
DAI
Abdullah et al., 2001 [15]MalaysiaWestern PacificGeneral12-13Both5,1122,449Orthodontic treatment
DHC
Abu Alhaija et al., 2004 [19]JordanEastern MediterraneanGeneral12-14Both1,002252Orthodontic treatment
DHC
Baca-Garcia et al., 2004 [24]SpainEuropeanGeneral14-20Both744308Orthodontic treatment
DAI
Birkeland et al., 1996 [27]NorwayEuropeanGeneral11Both359191Orthodontic treatment
DAI
Burden et al., 1994 [33]UKEuropeanGeneral11-12Both1,829600Overall dental treatment needs
Burden et al., 1995 [32]IrelandEuropeanGeneral11-12Both1,107697Orthodontic treatment
Esa et al., 2001 [39]MalaysiaWestern PacificGeneral12-13Both1,519566Malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need
Espeland et al., 1999 [41]NorwayEuropeanGeneral16-20Both25082Orthodontic treatment
Estioko et al., 1994 [42]AustraliaWestern PacificGeneral12-16Both26898Malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need
Foster et al., 1974 [43]UKEuropeanGeneral11-12Both1,000599Malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need
Hamdan., 2001 [45]JordanEastern MediterraneanGeneral14-17Both320160Orthodontic treatment
DHC
Hedayati et al., 2007 [46]IranEastern MediterraneanGeneral11-14Both1,965869Orthodontic treatment
DHC
Josefsson et al., 2007 [47]SwedenEuropeanGeneral12-13Both476307Orthodontic treatment
DHC
Kerosuo et al., 2004 [48]KuwaitEastern MediterraneanGeneral14-18Both13982Orthodontic treatment
DHC
Lewis et al., 2005 [50]USAAmericasChildren with special healthcare needs≤17Both38,86630,8153,205Overall dental treatment needs
Liepa et al., 2003 [51]LatviaEuropeanGeneral12-13Both505222Malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need
Manzanera et al., 2009 [52]SpainEuropeanGeneral12-16Both655139Orthodontic treatment
DHC
Marques et al., 2007 [53]BrazilAmericasGeneral13-15Both600462Malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need DAI
Mashoto et al., 2009 [54]TanzaniaAfricanGeneral10-19Both1,780790Overall dental treatment needs
Mugonzibwa et al., 2004 [55]TanzaniaAfricanGeneral9-18Both295164Orthodontic treatment
DHC
Nalweyiso et al., 2004 [57]UgandaAfricanGeneral12Both18165Overall dental treatment needs
Nobile et al., 2007 [58]ItalyEuropeanGeneral11-15Both546325Orthodontic treatment
DHC
Otuyemi et al., 1997 [60]NigeriaAfricanGeneral12-18Both703159Malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need
Perillo et al., 2010 [61]ItalyEuropeanGeneral12Both703451Orthodontic treatment
DHC
Puertes-Fernández et al., 2011 [62]SpainEuropeanGeneral12Both24897Orthodontic treatment
DHC
Rwakatema et al., 2007 [64]TanzaniaAfricanGeneral12-15Both289102Orthodontic treatment
DAI
Shivakumar et al., 2009 [67]IndiaSoutheast AsiaGeneral12-15Both1,000199Malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need
Shivakumar et al., 2010 [68]IndiaSoutheast AsiaGeneral12-15Both1,800362Malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need
Souames et al., 2006 [69]FranceEuropeanGeneral9-12Both511255Orthodontic treatment
DHC
Thilander et al., 2001 [70]ColombiaAmericasGeneral5-17Both4,7241,504Malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need

WHO, World Health Organization; DHC, dental health component; DAI, Dental Aesthetic Index.

Figure 2.

Prevalence of orthodontic treatment needs among adolescents. SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval; df, degree of freedom.

Figure 3.

Prevalence of (A) general dental treatment needs, (B) periodontal treatment needs, and (C) malocclusion treatment needs among adolescents. SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval; df, degree of freedom.

Figure 4.

Total prevalence of unmet dental needs among adolescents. SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval; df, degree of freedom.

Prevalence of dental healthcare needs

The overall prevalence of dental healthcare needs was 49.0% (95% CI, 42.0 to 56.0) across all types of dental care. Table 2 presents the overall prevalence by WHO region, sex, and year of publication of the study. The present review reported the prevalence of each type of dental healthcare need. Orthodontic treatment needs were reported in 54.2% of the studies, general needs in 23.7%, periodontal needs in 6.8%, and malocclusion needs in 12.3%.
Table 2.

Prevalence of any dental healthcare need and unmet needs among adolescents based on WHO region and sex

VariablesNeed
Unmet need
nPrevalence (95% CI)I2p-valuenPrevalence (95% CI)I2p-value
WHO regionAmericas864.1 (45.3, 82.8)99.9<0.001323.2 (18.0, 28.5)99.7<0.001
Southeast Asia646.7 (25.4, 68.0)99.8<0.001172.3 (70.1, 74.5)--
African734.4 (19.5, 49.4)99.4<0.001258.9 (13.9, 100)99.0<0.001
European1843.7 (13.7, 73.7)99.6<0.001211.8 (3.4, 20.3)94.5<0.001
Eastern Mediterranean1547.2 (32.6, 61.8)99.8<0.001118.3 (16.4, 20.2)--
Western Pacific340.8 (32.3, 49.3)96.9<0.001----
SexMale1950.0 (37.5, 63.5)99.7<0.001337.9 (4.6, 71.2)99.9<0.001
Female2149.8 (36.8, 62.9)99.7<0.001333.8 (29.0, 38.7)99.8<0.001
Both3347.9 (38.4, 57.3)99.8<0.001633.3 (19.1, 47.6)99.4<0.001
Year (range)1974-19991247.8 (31.8, 63.8)99.7<0.001116.2 (13.0, 19.4)--
2000-20041340.1 (34.2, 47.1)98.6<0.001135.9 (28.9, 42.9)--
2005-20091948.2 (36.5, 59.9)99.9<0.001421.1 (11.9, 30.3)99.1<0.001
2010-20161360.0 (41.0, 79.1)99.9<0.001356.6 (10.3, 99.0)99.8<0.001
Sample size (n)≤5001954.5 (41.9, 67.2)99.3<0.001243.0 (29.6, 56.5)90.1<0.001
501-1,0001844.8 (34.1, 55.5)99.5<0.001211.8 (3.40, 20.3)94.5<0.001
≥1,0012047.8 (36.0, 59.6)99.9<0.001538.9 (30.5, 47.2)99.9<0.001
Total5749.0 (42.0, 56.0)99.9<0.001934.0 (27.0, 40.0)99.9<0.001

WHO, World Health Organization; CI, confidence interval.

The prevalence of orthodontic treatment needs was reported in 32 studies. The pooled prevalence of orthodontic treatment needs was 46.0% (95% CI, 38.0 to 53.0; I2=99%) (Figure 2). With regard to WHO region, the highest prevalence was associated with countries in Europe (51.6%; 95% CI, 42.8 to 60.4) and the lowest with countries in Southeast Asia (28.8%; 95% CI, 26.9 to 30.7) (Table 3).
Table 3.

Prevalence of specific dental healthcare needs and unmet needs among adolescents based on WHO region

VariablesNeed
Unmet need
nPrevalence (95% CI)I2nPrevalence (95% CI)I2
Orthodontic treatmentAmericas------
Southeast Asia128.8 (26.9, 30.7)----
African343.0 (31.9, 54.2)93.6---
European1451.6 (42.8, 60.4)98.9116.2 (13.0, 19.4)-
Eastern Mediterranean1340.8 (25.6, 56.0)99.7118.3 (16.4, 20.2)-
Western Pacific147.9 (46.5, 49.3)----
General dental treatment needsAmericas473.7 (67.9, 79.5)90.1323.2 (18.0, 28.5)99.7
Southeast Asia264.6 (51.3, 77.9)98.8172.3 (70.1, 74.5)-
African378.0 (77.0, 80.0)99.8258.9 (13.9, 100)99.0
European224.0 (22.0, 25.0)99.917.6 (5.3, 9.9)-
Eastern Mediterranean184.2 (82.3, 86.0)----
Western Pacific------
Malocclusion treatmentAmericas254.4 (10.1, 98.6)99.8---
Southeast Asia220.0 (18.6, 21.5)00.0---
African122.6 (19.5, 25.7)----
European252.0 (36.4, 67.6)97.1---
Eastern Mediterranean------
Western Pacific237.2 (34.9, 39.4)00.0---
Periodontal treatment needsAmericas255.3 (25.7, 84.8)99.5---
Southeast Asia182.2 (79.7, 84.7)----
African------
European------
Eastern Mediterranean193.0 (91.6, 94.5)----
Western Pacific---

WHO, World Health Organization region; CI, confidence interval.

Twelve studies reported the prevalence of general treatment needs in adolescents. The pooled prevalence of general treatment needs was 59.0% (95% CI, 42.0 to 75.0) (Figure 3A). The highest prevalence rates were found in the Eastern Mediterranean region (84.2%; 95% CI, 82.3 to 86.0) and the Africa (78.0%; 95% CI, 77.0 to 80.0). The lowest prevalence was observed in Europe (24.0%; 95% CI, 22.0 to 25.0). None of the 12 studies were conducted in the Western Pacific region (Table 3). The pooled prevalence of periodontal treatment needs was 71.0% (95% CI, 46.0 to 96.0) (Figure 3B). The highest prevalence, 93.0% (95% CI, 91.6 to 94.5), was found in the Eastern Mediterranean region (Table 3). Nine studies reported the prevalence of malocclusion treatment needs in adolescents. The pooled prevalence of this type of need was 39.0% (95% CI, 28.0 to 50.0) (Figure 3C).

Prevalence of unmet dental healthcare needs

Nine studies reported the prevalence of unmet dental healthcare needs. The pooled prevalence of unmet dental needs was 34.0% (95% CI, 27.0 to 40.0) (Figure 4). The highest prevalence of unmet needs was found in Southeast Asia (72.3%; 95% CI, 70.1 to 74.5) and the lowest in Europe (11.8%; 95% CI, 3.4 to 20.3) (Table 2). Table 3 presents the prevalence of unmet needs by type of dental need and WHO region.

DISCUSSION

According to the results of the present systematic review, dental healthcare is a major global need in adolescents. Across all types of dental care, about 50% of adolescents worldwide were found to require dental healthcare services, and 34.0% were found to have unmet dental healthcare needs. The highest prevalence of these needs was observed in countries in the Americas and Europe, and the lowest was seen in Africa and the Western Pacific region. The seemingly higher prevalence observed in the Americas and Europe compared to Africa and the Western Pacific can be explained by the lower number of studies conducted in developing countries and their lower sample sizes compared to studies conducted in developed countries. The larger number of studies conducted on dental healthcare in developed countries suggests the greater perceived importance of dental health among adolescents in these countries. Developed countries therefore appear to have made more serious efforts than developing countries to identify dental health problems in adolescents. In contrast, the prevalence of unmet dental healthcare needs was lower in Europe and the Americas than in the other regions of the WHO. This prevalence was higher in Southeast Asia and Africa than in the other regions. Unmet dental needs therefore appear to be mainly associated with developing countries. In low-income and middle-income countries, the cost of dental healthcare can put a substantial financial burden on households [72]. In addition, members of the general public in these countries are not adequately protected against the high costs of dental healthcare [72]. A study conducted in Iran showed that the cost of essential dental care was an important determinant of catastrophic healthcare expenditures [73]. The high expenditures required for dental healthcare and the lack of associated insurance coverage in many countries, especially low-income and middle-income countries, can contribute to the high prevalence of unmet dental healthcare needs in these countries. Globally, unmet dental needs are common in adolescents. Unmet dental needs are an independent risk factor for oral health outcomes in adulthood [10], meaning that they can impose a high burden on the community, health system, and individuals [7]. Therefore, addressing unmet dental needs is important in terms of public health. Unmet dental needs affect the dental health-associated quality of life in adolescents [74]. Improving dental healthcare services and meeting dental healthcare needs can therefore promote overall quality of life in adolescents; nevertheless, given the high expenditures required for dental healthcare, policy-makers are recommended to more effectively provide households with the financial support they need for this highly expensive care. Moreover, the total number of people with unmet oral healthcare needs increased from 2.5 billion in 1990 to 3.5 billion in 2015, suggesting that oral health remains a global public health challenge [75], as emphasized by the global results of the present study in adolescents. Worldwide, there is a lack of knowledge about certain types of dental healthcare needs; for instance, no compelling evidence was found regarding the global prevalence of unmet periodontal and malocclusion treatment needs. The lack of knowledge regarding the prevalence of unmet dental healthcare needs is more serious at a global than at a local scale. The 9 studies included in the present review regarding unmet dental needs were limited to unmet general and orthodontic dental treatment needs. We therefore recommend that further studies be conducted on unmet dental healthcare needs in adolescents, especially in low-income and middle-income countries. The present systematic review and meta-analysis was faced with high heterogeneity between the results obtained in the included studies. Homogeneity was not achieved, despite conducting the subgroup analysis by WHO region and type of dental healthcare. The high heterogeneity observed can be explained by differences in the setting, time, and location of studies, in the type of dental healthcare, in the methods of evaluating of dental health needs and unmet needs, and in the quality of the included studies. The major limitations of the present systematic review and meta-analysis included the low quality of some of the included studies and their use of different tools and criteria for detecting dental healthcare needs. In addition, our results may be affected by selection bias due to lack of access to the full text of some papers as well as the potential existence of studies in the gray literature, such as theses and annual unpublished reports by nations regarding the prevalence of need and unmet needs.

CONCLUSION

The results obtained from this systematic review suggest that the prevalence of dental healthcare needs and unmet dental healthcare needs is globally significant in adolescents. The prevalence of dental healthcare needs was higher in the countries of the Americas and Europe than in other WHO regions. Unmet needs were more prevalent in Southeast Asia and Africa than in other WHO regions.
  70 in total

1.  Epidemiology of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need of 12-13-year-old Malaysian schoolchildren.

Authors:  R Esa; I A Razak; J H Allister
Journal:  Community Dent Health       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.349

2.  Impact of self-esteem on the relationship between orthodontic treatment need and oral health-related quality of life in 11- to 16-year-old children.

Authors:  Evelyne De Baets; Heleen Lambrechts; Jurgen Lemiere; Luwis Diya; Guy Willems
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Assessment of orthodontic treatment need in 11- to 20-year-old urban Iranian children using the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI).

Authors:  Faezeh Eslamipour; Ali Borzabadi-Farahani; Imaneh Asgari
Journal:  World J Orthod       Date:  2010

Review 4.  Oral health status and treatment needs among school children in Sana'a City, Yemen.

Authors:  K A Al-Haddad; N N Al-Hebshi; M S Al-Ak'hali
Journal:  Int J Dent Hyg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.477

5.  Dental Treatment Needs among Children and Adolescents Residing in an Ugandan Orphanage.

Authors:  Pessia Friedman Rubin; Ephraim Winocur; Assaf Erez; Ravit Birenboim-Wilensky; Benjamin Peretz
Journal:  J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.065

6.  Orthodontic treatment need and self-perception of 11-16-year-old Saudi Arabian children with a sensory impairment attending special schools.

Authors:  M Al-Sarheed; R Bedi; N P Hunt
Journal:  J Orthod       Date:  2003-03

7.  The use of index of orthodontic treatment need in an Iranian population.

Authors:  Z Hedayati; H R Fattahi; S B Jahromi
Journal:  J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent       Date:  2007-03

8.  Dental treatment needs of children in a rural subcounty of Uganda.

Authors:  N Nalweyiso; J Busingye; J Whitworth; P G Robinson
Journal:  Int J Paediatr Dent       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.455

9.  Malocclusions and orthodontic treatment needs in a group of Spanish adolescents using the Dental Aesthetic Index.

Authors:  Adela Baca-Garcia; Manuel Bravo; Pilar Baca; Arturo Baca; Pilar Junco
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.512

10.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  2 in total

1.  Association between malocclusion in the mixed dentition with breastfeeding and past nonnutritive sucking habits in school-age children.

Authors:  Glauber S Belitz; Lara J N Furlan; Jessica K Knorst; Luana C Berwig; Thiago M Ardenghi; Vilmar A Ferrazzo; Mariana Marquezan
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 2.684

2.  Minimal Important Difference of the Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire Following Orthodontic Treatment: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Wan Nurazreena Wan Hassan; Mohd Zambri Mohamed Makhbul; Zamros Yuzadi Mohd Yusof; Siti Adibah Othman
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.