| Literature DB >> 31777777 |
Atsuko Seki1, Zafia Anklesaria2, Rajeev Saggar3, Mark W Dodson4, Kristin Schwab2, Ming-Chang Liu2, Deepshikha Charan Ashana5, William D Miller6, Sitaram Vangala2, Ariss DerHovanessian2, Richard Channick2, Faisal Shaikh2, John A Belperio2, Stephen S Weigt2, Joseph P Lynch2, David J Ross2, Lauren Sullivan2, Dinesh Khanna7, Shelley S Shapiro2, Jeffrey Sager8, Luna Gargani9, Anna Stanziola10, Eduardo Bossone11, Dean E Schraufnagel12, Gregory Fishbein2, Haodong Xu13, Michael C Fishbein2, William D Wallace2, Rajan Saggar2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine if any histopathologic component of the pulmonary microcirculation can distinguish systemic sclerosis (SSc)-related pulmonary fibrosis (PF) with and without pulmonary hypertension (PH).Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31777777 PMCID: PMC6858021 DOI: 10.1002/acr2.1003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACR Open Rheumatol ISSN: 2578-5745
Baseline demographics, pulmonary and systemic hemodynamics, and pulmonary function of a systemic sclerosis–related pulmonary fibrosis cohort divided into subgroups either with pulmonary hypertension or without pulmonary hypertension
| Total (n = 31) | With PH (n = 22) | No PH (n = 9) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.029 | |||
| Autopsy | 9 (30.0%) | 9 (40.9%) | 0 | |
| Transplant | 22 (70.0%) | 13 (59.1%) | 9 (100%) | |
|
| 0.071 | |||
| Mean (SD) | 53.6 (11.5) | 56.0 (10.3) | 47.8 (12.6) | |
| Median (Q1‐Q3) | 55.0 (48.5‐60.0) | 55.0 (49.0‐63.8) | 50.0 (33.0‐58.0) | |
|
| 0.042 | |||
| Female | 19 (61.3%) | 12 (54.5%) | 7 (77.8%) | |
| Male | 12 (38.7%) | 10 (45.5%) | 2 (22.2%) | |
|
| 0.056 | |||
| Mean (SD) | 379.7 (428.1) | 286.5 (391.0) | 607.6 (451.1) | |
| Median (Q1‐Q3) | 168.0 (39.0‐718.5) | 152.0 (33.5‐232.0) | 771.0 (90.0‐956.0) | |
|
| 0.886 | |||
| Mean (SD) | 23.3 (3.7) | 23.2 (4.0) | 23.4 (3.1) | |
| Median (Q1‐Q3) | 23.0 (21.0‐25.5) | 23.0 (21.0‐24.8) | 22.0 (21.026.0) | |
C‐statistics for models predicting pulmonary hypertension (PH) in terms of pathologist consensus measures and measures of capillary proliferation from a systemic sclerosis–related pulmonary fibrosis cohort stratified by the presence or absence of PH (based on the analysis of 324 pathology slides by two pathologists)
| Effect | C‐Statistic |
|
|---|---|---|
| Consensus CP vs. consensus non‐CP | 0.753 | 0.011 |
| Maximum CP median | 0.869 | 0.013 |
| Maximum CP maximum | 0.821 | 0.011 |
| CP % involvement median | 0.838 | 0.027 |
| CP % involvement maximum | 0.737 | 0.029 |
| Consensus NSIP (NSIP alone or NSIP + UIP) vs. consensus non‐NSIP (only UIP) | 0.558 | 0.651 |
| Consensus small‐vessel vasculopathy vs. consensus non–small‐vessel vasculopathy | 0.720 | 0.029 |
Abbreviation: CP, capillary proliferation; NSIP, nonspecific interstitial pneumonia; UIP, usual interstitial pneumonia.
Figure 1Typical capillary proliferation (CP) and small‐vessel vasculopathy in lungs with advanced systemic sclerosis–related pulmonary fibrosis. (A) Diffuse distribution of CP (hematoxylin and eosin [H&E] stain; original magnification ×100); (B) Higher power example of CP; the alveolar walls have irregularly dilated capillaries with more than two layers (arrows) (H&E stain; original magnification ×200); (C) CP is demonstrated by highlighting endothelial cells, (CD31 immunohistochemistry stain; original magnification ×200); (D) Bronchovascular bundle demonstrating prominent pulmonary arterial intimal fibrosis (trichrome/elastin stain; original magnification ×100).
Mixed effects ordinal logistic regression models of small‐vessel vasculopathy in terms of capillary proliferation measures
| Effect | Small‐Vessel Vasculopathy OR (95% CI) |
|
|---|---|---|
| Maximum CP median | 2.03 (1.00, 4.12) | 0.049 |
| Maximum CP maximum | 1.44 (0.98, 2.12) | 0.061 |
| CP% involvement median | 1.37 (0.95, 1.97) | 0.094 |
| CP% involvement maximum | 1.32 (1.01, 1.72) | 0.043 |
| CP (yes/no) | 7.47 (1.15, 48.37) | 0.036 |
Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval; CP, capillary proliferation; OR, Odds Ratio.
Figure 2Light microscopy evaluation of alveolar tissue from the systemic sclerosis–related pulmonary fibrosis–pulmonary hypertension (SSc‐PF‐PH) autopsy that demonstrates irregular alveolar wall capillary proliferation in areas without interstitial fibrosis: (A) capillary proliferation (asterisk) adjacent to normal artery (thick arrow) and normal alveolar capillaries (thin arrow) (hematoxylin and eosin [H&E] stain; original magnification ×200); (B) scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of a vascular cast from the same SSc‐PF‐PH autopsy specimen highlighting extensive and crowded capillary duplication in the walls of two alveolar sacs. Note the abnormal pulmonary angiogenesis in the microvasculature with bulbous budding alternating with pinched areas in the alveolar capillary bed (SEM; original magnification ×569); (C) SEM of normal lung microvasculature and capillary bed. Note the much thinner capillary bed with more orderly arrangement of capillary architecture with few capillaries showing budding or abrupt termination of blind pouches (photos courtesy of Dr. Kazufumi Nakamura), (SEM, original magnification ×200.
Figure 3(A) Alveolar tissue at surgical lung biopsy of a systemic sclerosis (SSc)–pulmonary fibrosis (PF) subject without pulmonary hypertension (PH) with normal and inconspicuous capillary architecture adjacent to area of interstitial pneumonia (hematoxylin and eosin stain [H&E]; original magnification ×100); (B) Higher‐power view of alveolar tissue with normal architecture and inconspicuous capillaries (H&E stain; original magnification ×200); (C) Alveolar tissue from the same SSc‐PF subject (hemodynamic data in Supplemental Table E9B) after the interval development of PH from explanted lung tissue in areas without interstitial pneumonia but with alveolar capillary prominence and proliferation (arrows) and venular fibrosis (star) (H&E stain; original magnification ×100); (D) Higher‐power view of alveolar tissue from explant specimen showing alveolar capillary proliferation (arrows) (H&E stain; original magnification ×100).