Literature DB >> 31777033

Multiple ACL Revision: Failure Analysis and Clinical Outcomes.

Francesco Dini1, Andrea Tecame1, Aldo Ampollini1, Paolo Adravanti1.   

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction represents one of the most successful orthopedic surgical procedures. Nevertheless, ACL revisions are still very frequent, with a small but relevant number of failures. The purpose of this study is to analyze the failure causes and the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent a re-revision ACL reconstruction. Between January 2009 and December 2017, 263 ACL revisions were performed by a single senior surgeon. Seventeen patients (12 males and 5 females) underwent re-revision ACL reconstruction meeting the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 28.4 years (range, 19-41 years). Before the re-revision, the patients were evaluated preoperatively and after a mean follow-up of 29 months (range, 13-58 months). Assessment included subjective and objective evaluations (Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC]), KT-2000 arthrometer, radiographic study, and preoperative computed tomography scan. Five patients showed a too anterior previous femoral tunnel and seven a too vertical and posterior tibial tunnel; eight meniscal tears were found. Five patients had grade III-IV according to Outerbridge cartilage lesions. IKDC showed a statistically significant improvement (A + B 35%, C + D 65% preop, A + B 82%, C + D 18% postop, odds ratio: 0.1169; p = 0.0083). The mean Lysholm score ranged from 43 ± 9 to 87 ± 7 (p < 0.001). The KT-2000 arthrometer showed a statistically significant improvement from a mean of 5.8 ± 1.4 to 1.5 ± 1.1 (p < 0.001) at last follow-up. Out of 17 patients, only 4 returned to sports activity at the same preinjury levels. Postoperatively at the last follow-up after last revision surgery, no osteoarthritis evolution was observed. This study showed good clinical and radiological results after the last revision ACL surgery in patients with multiple failures of ACL reconstruction but only one-fourth of the patients returned to the same preoperative sport level. Traumatic events, technical errors, and untreated peripheral lesions are the main causes of multiple previous failures; the worst clinical outcomes were found in the patients with high grade of chondral lesions. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31777033     DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3400741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Knee Surg        ISSN: 1538-8506            Impact factor:   2.757


  4 in total

1.  Tibial slope correction combined with second revision ACLR grants good clinical outcomes and prevents graft rupture at 7-15-year follow-up.

Authors:  Anouk Rozinthe; Floris van Rooij; Guillaume Demey; Mo Saffarini; David Dejour
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Etiology of Failed Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: a Scoping Review.

Authors:  Dan Cohen; Patrick Fangping Yao; Abhilash Uddandam; Darren de Sa; Michelle E Arakgi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2022-07-19

3.  Bench to Bedside: A Multidisciplinary Approach toward the Unknowns after ACL Injuries to Drive Individual Success.

Authors:  Richard Ma; Trent Guess; David Echelmeyer; James P Stannard
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr

4.  Risk Factors Associated with Cartilage Defects after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture in Military Draftees.

Authors:  Ting-Yi Sun; Chun-Liang Hsu; Wei-Cheng Tseng; Tsu-Te Yeh; Guo-Shu Huang; Pei-Hung Shen
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-06-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.