Literature DB >> 31776738

How to implement the requirements of a quality assurance system for prostate cancer.

Barbara Noris Chiorda1,2, Fabiana Zollo2, Tiziana Magnani3, Fabio Badenchini2, Lucia Gatto2, Melanie Claps2,4, Alberto Macchi2,5, Laure Andreoli1, Nicola Nicolai2,5, Sergio Villa1,2, Riccardo Valdagni1,2,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In 2003, the German Cancer Society (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, DKG) launched a certification program aimed at improving the quality of cancer care. The purpose of this article is to describe the experience of the Prostate Cancer Unit (PCU) at Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, in the process towards DKG certification.
METHODS: In 2018, PCU decided to apply for certification by adopting DKG catalogue of requirements (CoR) and quality indicators. A multiprofessional working group was established with the aim of acting the necessary steps to meet DKG standards.
RESULTS: Our organizational setting (procedures, personnel) and activities were accurately analyzed, thus outlining strengths and weaknesses, and modified to comply with DKG CoR and indicators. As examples, (1) a quality management plan was developed; (2) measures were taken to strengthen the surgical expertise; (3) cases evaluated in weekly tumor boards were expanded to include surgical cases with pathological risk factors, metastatic, relapsed and castration-resistant patients; (4) a survey was added to the patient-dedicated initiatives already scheduled; (5) the TuDoc software became the tool to register all new cases of prostate cancer patients referred to PCU.
CONCLUSIONS: The process of certification requires many efforts but represents a unique opportunity of improving quality of care of prostate cancer patients, making it comparable on an international scale.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Certification; Multidisciplinarity; Prostate cancer; Quality of care

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31776738     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-03024-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  2 in total

1.  Quality Indicators for Bladder Cancer Services: A Collaborative Review.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Leow; James W F Catto; Jason A Efstathiou; John L Gore; Ahmed A Hussein; Shahrokh F Shariat; Angela B Smith; Alon Z Weizer; Manfred Wirth; J Alfred Witjes; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  'Act on oncology' as a new comprehensive approach to assess prostate cancer centres--method description and results of a pilot study.

Authors:  Wieland Voigt; Josef Hoellthaler; Tiziana Magnani; Vito Corrao; Riccardo Valdagni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  From quality management to quality improvement-structures, processes and outcomes.

Authors:  Simone Wesselmann; Martin Burchardt; Christoph Kowalski
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 4.226

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.