| Literature DB >> 31776726 |
Andrea Kühnl1,2, Clare Peckitt1, Bijal Patel1, Kirit M Ardeshna3, Marian P Macheta4, John Radford5, Rod Johnson6, Shankaranarayana Paneesha7, Sarah Barton1,8, Ian Chau1, Ruwaida Begum1, Nicola Valeri9, Andrew Wotherspoon1, Yong Du1, Imene Zerizer1, David Cunningham10.
Abstract
Outcome of patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains poor, highlighting the need for novel treatment approaches. The multicentre randomised phase II LEGEND trial evaluated lenalidomide in combination with rituximab, methylprednisolone and gemcitabine (R-GEM-L) vs. standard R-GEM-P as second-line treatment of DLBCL. The study closed early to recruitment after the planned interim analysis failed to demonstrate a complete response (CR) rate of ≥ 40% in either arm. Among 34 evaluable patients, 7/18 (38.9%) achieved CR with R-GEM-L and 3/16 (18.8%) with R-GEM-P. Median event-free and overall survival was 3.5/3.8 months and 10.8/8.3 months for R-GEM-L and R-GEM-P, respectively. The incidence of grade ≥ 3 toxicities was 52% in R-GEM-L and 83% in R-GEM-P. Efficacy and tolerability of R-GEM-L seem comparable with R-GEM-P and other standard salvage therapies, but a stringent design led to early trial closure. Combination of lenalidomide with gemcitabine-based regimens should be further evaluated in r/r DLBCL.Entities:
Keywords: DLBCL; Lenalidomide; Second-line therapy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31776726 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-019-03842-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Hematol ISSN: 0939-5555 Impact factor: 3.673