| Literature DB >> 31776397 |
Alexandra Mocanu1, Gabriela Isopencu2, Cristina Busuioc1, Oana-Maria Popa3, Paul Dietrich4, Liana Socaciu-Siebert4.
Abstract
This study aimed to obtain possible materials for future antimicrobial food packaging applications based on biodegradable bacterial cellulose (BC). BC is a fermentation product obtained by Gluconacetobacter xylinum using food or agricultural wastes as substrate. In this work we investigated the synergistic effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) and propolis extracts deposited on BC. ZnO NPs were generated in the presence of ultrasounds directly on the surface of BC films. The BC-ZnO composites were further impregnated with ethanolic propolis extracts (EEP) with different concentrations.The composition of raw propolis and EEP were previously determined by gas-chromatography mass-spectrometry (GC-MS), while the antioxidant activity was evaluated by TEAC (Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity). The analysis methods performed on BC-ZnO composites such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM), thermo-gravimetrically analysis (TGA), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) proved that ZnO NPs were formed and embedded in the whole structure of BC films. The BC-ZnO-propolis films were characterized by SEM and X-ray photon spectroscopy (XPS) in order to investigate the surface modifications. The antimicrobial synergistic effect of the BC-ZnO-propolis films were evaluated against Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, and Candida albicans. The experimental results revealed that BC-ZnO had no influence on Gram-negative and eukaryotic cells.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31776397 PMCID: PMC6881355 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-54118-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1SEM micrographs of BC films (a), ZnO NPs (b), BC-ZnO-40US (c), and BC-ZnO-100US (d).
Figure 2EDX analysis performed on both types of composite films obtained at 40 kHz, respectively 100 kHz: (a) spectra and elemental composition and (b) elemental mapping.
Figure 3Thermal analysis of BC modified with ZnO.
Figure 4XPS survey over the surface of: (a) BC; (c) BC-ZnO, (e) BC-ZnO-propolis films, respectively deconvolution of C1s peak (b,d,f).
Antimicrobial activity of composite films against E. coli, B. subtilis, C. albicans.
| Composite film code with EEP concentration | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IZ, mm | MIC, mg/mL | IZ, mm | MIC, mg/mL | IZ, mm | MIC, mg/mL | |
| BC -ETOH (control) | 2 ± 0.05 | 1.89 | 0 (+) | >1.89 | 2 ± 0.07 | 1.89 |
BC-EEP1 (control) (S1*) | 3 ± 0.1 | 1.3 | 8 ± 0.25 | <0.44 | 3 ± 0.15 | 1.3 |
BC-EEP2 (control) (S2*) | 1.5 ± 0.05 | >0.8 | 9 ± 0.35 | <0.44 | 4 ± 0.25 | 0.44 |
BC- EEP3 (control) (S3*) | 0 (+) | >1.89 | 8 ± 0.22 | <0.44 | 4 ± 0.25 | 0.44 |
BC- EEP4 (control) (S4*) | 5 ± 0.25 | 0.44 | 12 ± 0.05 | < 0.44 | 7 ± 0.1 | <0.44 |
| BC-ZnO-40 (control) | 0 (+) | >1.89 | 4 ± 0.13 | 0.44 | 0 (−) | >1.89 |
| BC-ZnO-40-EEP1 (F1S1*) | 0 (+) | >1.89 | 5 ± 0.15 | 0.44 | 0 (+) | >1.89 |
BC-ZnO-40-EEP2 (F1S2*) | 0 (+) | >1.89 | 8 ± 0.25 | <0.44 | 1 ± 0.05 | >0.8 |
BC-ZnO-40-EEP3 (F1S3*) | 0 (+) | >1.89 | 4 ± 0.05 | 0.44 | 3 ± 0.35 | 1.3 |
BC-ZnO-40-EEP4 (F1S4*) | 0 (+) | >1.89 | 4 ± 0.35 | 0.44 | 2 ± 0.05 | 1.89 |
| BC-ZnO-100 (control) | 0 (+) | >1.89 | 4 ± 0.15 | 0.44 | 0 (+) | >1.89 |
BC-ZnO-100-EEP1 (F2S1*) | 0 (+) | >1.89 | 4 ± 0.25 | 0.44 | 0 (+) | >1.89 |
BC-ZnO-100-EEP2 (F2S2*) | 0 (+) | >1.89 | 7 ± 0.15 | <0.44 | 0 (+) | >1.89 |
BC-ZnO-100-EEP3 (F2S3*) | 0 (+) | >1.89 | 3 ± 0.25 | 0.44 | 5 ± 0.15 | 1.3 |
BC-ZnO-100-EEP4 (F2S4*) | 0 (+) | >1.89 | 2 ± 0.15 | 0.44 | 4 ± 0.25 | 1.89 |
*Assigned codes for BC-ZnOfilms impregnated with EEP solutions from Supplementary information.