Literature DB >> 3177606

Cholesteatoma surgery: open vs closed tympanoplasty.

A Quaranta1, P Cassano, G Carbonara.   

Abstract

The purpose of this report is to compare closed tympanoplasty (canal wall up) and open tympanoplasty (canal wall down) performed in ears with extensive cholesteatoma operated on and followed up during the past 11 years. The study has demonstrated that there are no significant differences between open and closed tympanoplasties in terms of both postoperative subjective problems and auditory results. The only definite difference relates to recurring cholesteatoma: canal wall-up operations are complicated by recurrence of cholesteatoma in a not insignificant number of ears and require a planned two-stage procedure in all the cases. By contrast, the postoperative clinical course of open tympanoplasties has been only rarely affected by cholesteatomatous complications. It is concluded that reduction of cholesteatoma recurrence to the greatest degree possible necessitates removal of the canal wall. Open tympanoplasty is an effective alternative for closed tympanoplasty in all cases in which there is a contraindication to preserving the canal wall and in all patients whose medical or social conditions prevent scheduling an operation in more stages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3177606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Otol        ISSN: 0192-9763


  7 in total

1.  Long-term hearing results of one-stage tympanoplasty for chronic otitis media.

Authors:  E Vartiainen; J Nuutinen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  The effects of surgery type and different ossiculoplasty materials on the hearing results in cholesteatoma surgery.

Authors:  Sultan Şevik Eliçora; Duygu Erdem; Aykut Erdem Dinç; Murat Damar; Sultan Bişkin
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Health-related quality of life measurement after cholesteatoma surgery: comparison of three different surgical techniques.

Authors:  Susen Lailach; Max Kemper; Nikoloz Lasurashvili; Thomas Beleites; Thomas Zahnert; Marcus Neudert
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  Cartilage ossiculoplasty in cholesteatoma surgery: hearing results and prognostic factors.

Authors:  N Quaranta; S Taliente; F Coppola; I Salonna
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.124

5.  Chronic Draining Ear and Cholesteatoma Recidivism: A Retrospection from Clinical, Imaging, and Surgical Perspectives.

Authors:  Saumik Das; Mainak Dutta; Tanaya Panja; Ramanuj Sinha
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-09-01

Review 6.  Results of endoscopic middle ear surgery for cholesteatoma treatment: a systematic review.

Authors:  L Presutti; F M Gioacchini; M Alicandri-Ciufelli; D Villari; D Marchioni
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.124

Review 7.  Some considerations about acquired adult and pediatric cholesteatomas.

Authors:  Cristina Dornelles; Sady S da Costa; Luíse Meurer; Cláudia Schweiger
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005-12-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.