| Literature DB >> 31775300 |
Laima Česonienė1, Edita Mažuolytė-Miškinė1, Daiva Šileikienė1, Kristina Lingytė1, Edmundas Bartkevičius1.
Abstract
Many countries of the world, including Lithuanpan>ia, are making anpan> effort to reduce surface pan> class="Chemical">water pollution. State monitoring data show that almost 80% of the lakes in Lithuania have an increased amount of sludge. One of the reasons for this increase in sludge is an excessive amount of biogenic material in the water. It is known that even after the source of pollution is removed, the condition of the lake water does not improve; rather, the condition of the lake water worsens due to the secondary pollution of sludge in the water. A study was conducted to determine the impact of secondary sludge pollution on water. For this study, 5 sludge samples were taken from different lakes in Lithuania. Fresh water was poured on the sludge samples, the concentrations of Nt, NO2-N, NO3-N, NH4-N, PO4-P, Pt, the pH and the changes in the electric conductivity (C) were measured in the water within 28 h. Research has shown that the thickness of the sludge layer influences the total amounts of nitrogen, phosphorus, and organic matter present in the sludge. As the thickness of the sludge layer increases in a lake, the total concentrations of nitrogen, total phosphorus and organic matter increase. Studies have also shown that the concentrations of all biogenic substances in water increase, with the exception of total phosphorus. This finding shows that organic phosphorus is "locked" in sludge, and no secondary pollution occurs from this source. Moreover, the electrical conductivity values of the water influence the release of biogenic substances from sludge in the water.Entities:
Keywords: lakes; nitrogen; phosphorus; sampling
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31775300 PMCID: PMC6926932 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16234691
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1The layout of the investigated lakes in the territory of Lithuania.
Figure 2Sampling scheme.
Figure 3Nitrogen and phosphorus concentration in sludge.
Depth, sludge layer, Nt, Pt and organic matter content of the sludge samples from the analyzed lakes.
| Number | Lake | Average Depth of the Lake, m | Sludge Layer Thickness m | NT (Sludge) | PT (Sludge) | Organic Matter Content % (Sludge) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Biržulis | 0.9 | 1.9 | 14,238.4 | 479.6 | 32.9 |
| 2 | Antakmenis | 5.8 | 2.7 | 12,144.7 | 725.3 | 32.4 |
| 3 | Gauštvinis | 5 | 4.3 | 8464.5 | 674 | 27.6 |
| 4 | Spėra | 1.85 | 4.7 | 18,078.0 | 980.5 | 43.1 |
| 5 | Kiementas | 4 | 6.1 | 21,415.0 | 898.0 | 46.9 |
Figure 4Correlation between Nt, Pt and the amount of organic matter in the sludge to sludge layer thickness.
Figure 5Dynamics of Nt and NO2-N concentrations in water.
Figure 6Dynamics of NO3-N and NH4-N concentrations in water.
Figure 7Dynamics of Pt and PO4-P concentrations in water.
Figure 8Dynamics of pH value and SEC concentrations in water.
Regression equations for predicting Nt and NO2-N concentrations.
| Number | N Total mg/L | NO2-N mg/L |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Y Birzulis = 3.312 + 0.5577x − 0.0131x2, r = 0.863 | YBirzulis = 0.0167 + 0.0008x + 4.6356E − 5x2; r = 0.98 |
| 2 | YAntakmeniu = 1.1729 + 0.2463x − 0.0026x2; r = 0.975 | YAntakmeniu = 0.0283 + 0.0013x − 3.14111E − 5x2; r = 0.971 |
| 3 | YGaustvinis = 4.5323 + 0.2396x − 0.0037x2; r = 0.944 | YGauštvinis = 0.0269 + 0.0009x; r = 0.96 |
| 4 | YSpera = 4.6234 + 0.6687x − 0.0162x2; r = 0.883 | YSpera = 0.0243 + 0.0034x − 9.7668E − 5x2; r = 0.885 |
| 5 | YKiementas = 4.8806 + 0.808x − 0.0225x2; r = 0.928 | YKiementas = 0.023 + 0.0011x; r = 0.969 * |
| 0 ≤ x ≤ 2.0 | ||
Note: The symbol * indicates that the data were reliable within a probability of 95%.
Regression equations for predicting NO3-N and electrical conductivity (C) concentrations.
| Number | NO3-N mg/L | Electrical Conductivity (C) µS/cm |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | YBiržulis = 0.0344 + 0.0049x; r = 0.963 | YBiržulis = 649.2857 + 1.0327x − 0.0175x2; r = 0.94 |
| 2 | YAntakmeniu = 0.0263 + 0.0029x; r = 0.97 | YAntakmeniu = 653.1714 + 4.2939x − 0.137x2; r = 0.982 * |
| 3 | YGauštvinis = 0.0303 + 0.0026x; r = 0.985 * | YGauštvinis = 655.8 + 2.4286x; r = 0.938 * |
| 4 | YSpera = 0.0542 + 0.0107x − 0.0003x2; r = 0.994 * | YSpera = 628.4 + 2.7x − 0.0714x2; r = 0.98 * |
| 5 | YKiementas = 0.0515 + 0.0111x − 0.0003x2; r = 0.975 | YKiementas = 653.7429 + 2.8735x − 0.07x2; r = 0.942 |
| 0 ≤ x ≤ 2.0 | ||
Note: The symbol * indicates that the data were reliable within a probability of 95%.
Regression equations for predicting PTotal and PO4-P concentrations.
| Number | P total mg/L | PO4-P mg/L |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Y Birzulis = 0.0815 + 0.0003x − 2.629E-5 * x2; r = 0.909 | YBiržulis = 0.1227 + 0.0242x; r = 0.987 |
| 2 | YAntakmeniu = 0.09 − 0.0013x; r = 0.998 * | YAntakmeniu = 0.1267 + 0.0342x − 0.0009x2; r = 0.958 |
| 3 | YGaustvinis = 0.1112 + 0.0007x − 2.2886E − 5 * x2; r = 0.781 | YGaustvinis = 0.0486 + 0.0879x − 0.0016x2; r = 0.908 |
| 4 | YSpera = 0.1061 + 0.0035x − 0.0002x2; r = 0.87 | YSpera = 0.067 + 0.0307x − 0.0006x2; r = 0.92 |
| 5 | YKiementas = 0.13 − 3.3061E − 5x − 3.207E − 6Ex2; r = 0.998 * | YKiementas = 0.1349 + 0.13x; r = 0.82 |
| 0 ≤ x ≤ 2.0 | ||
Note: The symbol * indicates that the data were reliable within a probability of 95%.
Regression equations for predicting pH value and NH4-N concentrations.
| Number | pH | NH4-N mg/L |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | YBiržulis = 7.264 + 0.0783x − 0.0018x2; r = 0.974 | YBiržulis = 0.0183 − 0.0106x + 0.0006x2, r = 0.92 |
| 2 | YAntakmeniu = 7.1877 + 0.0805x − 0.0021x2; r = 0.978 | YAntakmeniu = 0.0119 + 0.0029x − 0.0001x2, r = 0.39 |
| 3 | YGauštvinis = 7.2446 + 0.0787x − 0.002x2; r = 0.958 | YGauštvinis = 0.0114 − 0.0074x + 0.0004x2, r = 0.95 |
| 4 | YSpera = 7.2551 + 0.0544x − 0.0009x2; r = 0.942 | YSpera = 0.0004 + 0.0005x, r = 0.88 |
| 5 | YKiementas = 7.302 + 0.078x − 0.002x2; r = 0.975 | YKiementas = 0.0061 − 0.0035x + 0.0002x2, r = 0.92 |
| 0 ≤ x ≤ 2.0 | ||
Figure 9Dynamics of average phosphorus values.
Correlation matrix between Nt; NO2 -N; NO3- N; NH4 -NPO4-P, Pt concentrations and C values.
| Parameter | PT mg/L | NT mg/L | NH4-N | NO2-N mg/L | NO3-N | PO4-P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC µS/cm | r = −0.945 | r = 0.966 | r = −0.001 | r = −0.559 | r = 0.787 | r = −0.033 |
Figure 10Correlation of Nt and Pt concentrations with electrical water conductivity.
Figure 11Correlation of NO3-N and NO2-N concentrations with electrical water conductivity.
Figure 12Correlation of NH4-N and PO4-P concentrations with electrical water conductivity.