| Literature DB >> 31775258 |
Bin Luo1,2, Mingchao Chi1,2, Qingtong Zhang1,2, Mingfu Li1,2, Changzhou Chen1,2, Xiluan Wang3, Shuangfei Wang1,2, Douyong Min1,2.
Abstract
Technical lignin from pulping, an aromatic polymer with ~59% carbon content, was employed to develop novel lignin-based nano carbon thin film (LCF)-copper foil composite films for thermal management applications. A highly graphitized, nanoscale LCF (~80-100 nm in thickness) was successfully deposited on both sides of copper foil by spin coating followed by annealing treatment at 1000 °C in an argon atmosphere. The conditions of annealing significantly impacted the morphology and graphitization of LCF and the thermal conductivity of LCF-copper foil composite films. The LCF-modified copper foil exhibited an enhanced thermal conductivity of 478 W m-1 K-1 at 333 K, which was 43% higher than the copper foil counterpart. The enhanced thermal conductivity of the composite films compared with that of the copper foil was characterized by thermal infrared imaging. The thermal properties of the copper foil enhanced by LCF reveals its potential applications in the thermal management of advanced electronic products and highlights the potential high-value utility of lignin, the waste of pulping.Entities:
Keywords: copper foil; graphitization; lignin; thermal conductivity; thermal management
Year: 2019 PMID: 31775258 PMCID: PMC6956031 DOI: 10.3390/nano9121681
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1SEM images of lignin carbon thin film (LCF) on the surface of copper foil: (a) LCF–Cu 20–40, (b) LCF–Cu 120–40, and (c) LCF–Cu 120–300.
Figure 2(a) TEM image of LCF–Cu 120–300; (b) HRTEM images at different positions for LCF–Cu 120–300, (c) the corresponding SAED image; (d) AFM image showing thickness of LCF; (e) AFM image showing height of the ripples.
Figure 3High-resolution XPS spectra of (a) LF-Cu, (b) LCF–Cu 20–40, (c) LCF–Cu 120–40, and (d) LCF–Cu 120–300.
Relative contents of elements and carbon species.
| Sample | RT (min) | CT (min) | Relative Content (%) * | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | O | C–C/C=C | C–O–C | O–C=C | R–OH or C–O–C | |||
| Lignin | - | - | 59.4 | 40.6 | 71.3 | 7.8 | 12.8 | 8.1 |
| LCF–Cu20–40 | 20 | 40 | 67.1 | 32.9 | 74.8 | 12.8 | 12.4 | - |
| LCF–Cu120–40 | 120 | 40 | 68.9 | 31.1 | 82.2 | 5.9 | 11.9 | - |
| LCF–Cu120–300 | 120 | 300 | 88.0 | 12.0 | 84.3 | 12.0 | 3.7 | - |
* Relative % carbon species content = , where Acarbon is the peak area of the specific carbon species, Atotal carbon is the total peak area of carbon species.
Figure 4Raman spectra of (a) LCF–Cu 20–40, (b) LCF–Cu 120–40, and (c) LCF–Cu 120–300.
Figure 5(a) α and (b) K of the untreated Cu foil, annealed Cu foil, and LCF–Cu sample at 333 K; (c) α and (d) K variations with the temperature of the untreated Cu foil, annealed Cu foil, and LCF–Cu 120–300.
Comparison of various copper-based thermal management materials.
| No. | Matrix | Method | Strengthening Phase | K | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cu | Carbonization | LCF | 478 | Current study |
| 2 | Cu | - | - | 313 | [ |
| 3 | Cu | Chemical vapor deposition | Few layers graphene | 376 | [ |
| 4 | Cu | Vacuum filtration and spark plasma sintering | Graphene nano-platelet | 525 | [ |
| 5 | Cu | chemical mixing | Carbon nanofiber | 435 | [ |
| 6 | Graphite | Electroplating Cu on synthetic graphite sheets | Cu | 527 | [ |
Figure 6(a) Sample placement for infrared imaging. Continuous infrared imaging results: at 0s (b), 30s (c), and 60s (d).