| Literature DB >> 31774832 |
Kossia D T Gboko1, Sylvain G Traoré1,2, Aimé R Sanhoun1,3, Jérôme Kirioua2, Nize Otaru4, Fabienne Kurt4, Fabienne N Jaeger5,6, Julia Isenring4, Dasel W M Kaindi7, Bernd Kreikemeyer8, Pierre Renault9, Jan Hattendorf5,6, Leo Meile4, Christoph Jans4, Roland Nguetta10,11, Bassirou Bonfoh1,5,6.
Abstract
Streptococcus infantarius subsp. infantarius (Sii) has been identified as predominant lactic acid bacteria in spontaneously fermented dairy products (FDPs) in sub-Saharan Africa including Côte d'Ivoire. However, Sii belongs to the Streptococcus bovis/Streptococcus equinus complex (SBSEC). Most SBSEC members are assumed to be involved as opportunistic pathogens in serious diseases in both humans and animals. A population-based cross-sectional survey, including 385 participants was conducted in Korhogo, northern Côte d'Ivoire, to identify risk factors for Sii fecal carriage, including consumption of local FDPs. A structured questionnaire was used to gather participant's socio-demographic and economic characteristics, their relation to livestock and dietary habits. In addition, fresh stool and milk samples were collected. The identification of Sii was done using a SBSEC-specific PCR assay targeting 16S rRNA and groEL genes. The overall prevalence of SBSEC and Sii carriage was 23.2% (confidence interval CI 95% = 18.9-27.5) and 12.0% (CI 95% = 8.4-15.5) for stool, respectively. Prevalence of Sii was significantly higher in consumers of artisanal butter compared with non-consumers (57.1% vs 10.1%, odds ratio OR: 11.9, 95% CI: 3.9-36.6), as well as in persons handling livestock (OR = 3.9; 95% CI = 1.6-9.3) and livestock primary products (OR = 5.7; 95% CI = 2.3-14.3). The closer contact with livestock was a risk factor for Sii fecal carriage. Sii strains were isolated from fresh and fermented milk products with a prevalence of 30.4% and 45.4%, respectively. Analysis of Sii population structure through the SBSEC multi locus sequence typing assay revealed a close relationship across human and dairy isolates, possibly linked to a Kenyan human isolate. All these outcomes underline the interest of in-depth investigations on the ecology, potential reservoirs and pathways of contamination by Sii at the human-animal-environment interface in comparison to yet to be collected data from Europe, Asia and the Americas to further elucidate the various roles of Sii.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31774832 PMCID: PMC6881063 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225452
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Illustration of the study site in the city of Korhogo and surrounding farms, northern Côte d’Ivoire.
The illustrated map shows the selected neighborhoods (in blue capital font) and villages (in red) where the farms are located. Overview map of Côte d’Ivoire reprinted from the World Factbook.
Fig 2Data flow diagram of participant selection procedure and SBSEC/Sii detection from stool and milk sample analysis.
Demographic, economic, behavioral and health characteristics of the study population.
| Variables | Description | % (n) |
|---|---|---|
| Age (Years) | 18–30 | 36.3 (137) |
| 31–60 | 54.1 (204) | |
| >60 | 9.1 (36) | |
| Gender | Male | 37.1 (143) |
| Female | 62.9 (242) | |
| Birth country | Côte d'Ivoire | 87.3 (336) |
| Other | 12.7 (49) | |
| Level of education | Ever attended school | 47.3 (182) |
| Koranic school | 17.7 (68) | |
| Conventional school | 35 (135) | |
| Primary | 37 (50) | |
| Secondary | 54.8 (74) | |
| University | 8.2 (11) | |
| Number of person per house | Single person | 3.7 (14) |
| 2–4 | 19.5 (74) | |
| 5–10 | 40.1 (152) | |
| >10 | 36.7 (139) | |
| Water supply of the house | Tap water | 41.4 (157) |
| Protected well | 63.6 (241) | |
| Water hole | 1.8 (7) | |
| Pump | 4.7 (18) | |
| Socioeconomic status | Lowest quartile | 26.2 (101) |
| Second quartile | 23.9 (92) | |
| Third quartile | 25.2 (97) | |
| Highest quartile | 24.7 (95) | |
| Lifestyle | ||
| Dietary habits | Regime without milk products | 3.2 (11) |
| Regime without pork | 84.8 (324) | |
| Tobacco consumption | Never smoked | 82 (314) |
| Current consumers | 12.3 (47) | |
| Past-consumers | 5.7 (22) | |
| Alcohol consumption | Non-consumers | 89.2 (339) |
| Current consumers | 7.9 (30) | |
| Past-consumers | 2.9 (11) | |
| Health characteristics | ||
| BMI | Underweight, BMI < 18.5 | 9.6 (35) |
| Normal, 18.5 ≤BMI ≥ 24.9 | 52.6 (191) | |
| Overweight ≥25 | 37.7 (137) | |
| Morbidities | Heart disorders | 4.2 (16) |
| Hypertension | 15.2 (58) | |
| Diabetes | 2.4 (9) | |
| Arthritis | 2.4 (9) | |
| Ulcer | 21.8 (83) | |
| Lung problems | 1.8 (7) |
aNumbers might not add up to 385 because of missing values
bBurkina Faso, Mali, Niger, Ghana, Togo
cmultiple answers possible
dBMI: body mass index, (Weight (Kg) / Height (m2)).
Fig 3Proportion of different local dairy products consumed in farms (light colored columns) in comparison to urban households (dark columns).
Univariate analysis of risk factors for Sii fecal carriage among the study population.
| Variables | Category | %(n positive/ n total) | OR | 95% CI | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Female | 10.3 (21/204) | 1.00 | ||
| Male | 14.7 (18/122) | 1.5 | 0.8–2.9 | 0.23 | |
| Age (Years) | 18–30 | 10.3 (12/117) | 1.00 | ||
| 31–60 | 10.5 (18/171) | 1.0 | 0.5–2.2 | 0.94 | |
| >60 | 24.2 (8/33) | 2.8 | 1.0–7.6 | 0.04 | |
| Birth country | Other country | 10.6 (31/291) | 1.00 | ||
| Sahelian country | 22.9 (8/35) | 2.5 | 1.0–5.9 | 0.04 | |
| Residence area | Neighborhoods | 9.9 (30/303) | 1.00 | ||
| Farms | 39.1 (9/23) | 5.8 | 2.3–14.6 | <0.001 | |
| Socioeconomic status | Lowest quartile | 16.3 (14/86) | 1.00 | ||
| Second quartile | 8.1 (6/74) | 0.4 | 0.2–1.2 | 0.13 | |
| Third quartile | 15.5 (13.84) | 0.9 | 0.4–2.1 | 0.9 | |
| Highest quartile | 7.3 (6/82) | 0.4 | 0.1–1.1 | 0.08 | |
| Livestock ownership | No | 10.4 (26/251) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 20 (12/60) | 2.2 | 1.0–4.6 | 0.04 | |
| Contact with livestock | |||||
| Livestock nearby dwelling place | No | 10.9 (21/192) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 14.7 (17/116) | 1.4 | 0.7–2.8 | 0.34 | |
| Daily routine with livestock | No | 10.4 (29/279) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 31 (9/29) | 3.9 | 1.6–9.3 | 0.002 | |
| Daily routine with livestock primary product | No | 10.2 (29/285) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 39.1 (9/23) | 5.7 | 2.3–14.3 | <0.001 | |
| Only some people at home in contact with livestock | No | 12.3 (36/292) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 12.5 (2/16) | 1.01 | 0.2–4.6 | 0.984 | |
| No contact with livestock | No | 14.4 (21/146) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 10.5 (17/162) | 0.7 | 0.4–1.4 | 0.302 | |
| Type of dairy products consumed | |||||
| Raw milk | No | 10 (20/199) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 19.0 (11/58) | 2.1 | 0.9–4.7 | 0.07 | |
| Heated milk | No | 20 (8/40) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 10.6 (23/217) | 0.5 | 0.2–1.1 | 0.09 | |
| FDP from market | No | 14.5 (24/165) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 7.6 (7.92) | 0.5 | 0.2–1.2 | 0.12 | |
| Homemade FDP | No | 9.9 (17/171) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 16.3 (14/86) | 1.8 | 0.8–3.8 | 0.14 | |
| Artisanal butter | No | 10.1 (31/308) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 57.1 (8/14) | 12 | 3.9–36.6 | <0.001 | |
| Industrial butter | No | 12 .6 (27/215) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 11 (12/109) | 0.9 | 0.4–1.8 | 0.7 | |
| Industrial cheese | No | 12.3 (39/317) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 0 (0/5) | 1 | |||
| Ice cream | No | 12.5 (36/289) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 3.1 (1/32) | 0.2 | 0.03–1.7 | 0.15 | |
| Milk powder | No | 13.2 (20/151) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 10.9 (19/174) | 0.8 | 0.4–1.6 | 0.52 | |
| Imported FDP | No | 13.4 (39/291) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 0 (0/25) | 1 | |||
| Yogurt | No | 14.3 (32/223) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 6.9 (7/102) | 0.4 | 0.2–1.0 | 0.06 | |
| Other foods | |||||
| Eggs | No | 12.5 (8/64) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 11.5 (30/260) | 0.9 | 0.4–2.1 | 0.83 | |
| Poultry with skin | No | 8.9 (12/135) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 13.8 (26/188) | 1.6 | 0.8–3.4 | 0.18 | |
| Poultry without skin | No | 11.9 (33/278) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 11.1 (5/45) | 0.9 | 0.3–2.5 | 0.88 | |
| Can meat | No | 12.2 (37/303) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 5 (1/20) | 0.4 | 0.1–2.9 | 0.35 | |
| Can fish | No | 11.9 (28/236) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 11.6 (10/86) | 0.97 | 0.4–2.1 | 0.95 | |
| Pig meat | No | 11.5 (34/296) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 16 (4/25) | 1.5 | 0.5–4.5 | 0.51 | |
| Red meat | No | 14.2 (18/127) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 10.1 (19/189) | 0.7 | 0.3–1.3 | 0.27 | |
| "Choukouya" (Braised meat) | No | 11.4 (15/132) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 12 (23/191) | 1.1 | 0.5–2.1 | 0.85 | |
| Fish | No | 25 (2/8) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 11.5 (36/314) | 0.4 | 0.1–2 | 0.26 | |
| Seafood | No | 12.2 (34/279) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 2.7 (1/37) | 0.2 | 0.03–1.5 | 0.12 |
aOR: odds ratio
bCI: confidence interval.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors for Sii fecal carriage.
| Variables | Category | %(n positive/ n total) | OR | 95% CI | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Female | 10.3 (21/204) | 1.00 | ||
| Male | 14.7 (18/122) | 0.8 | 0.3–2.6 | 0.75 | |
| Age (Years) | 18–30 | 10.3 (12/117) | 1.00 | ||
| 31–60 | 10.5 (18/171) | 0.9 | 0.3–2.4 | 0.84 | |
| >60 | 24.2 (8/33) | 1.6 | 0.4–6.1 | 0.49 | |
| Birth country | Other country | 10.6 (31/291) | 1.00 | ||
| Sahelian country | 22.9 (8/35) | 0.3 | .1–2 | 0.24 | |
| Socioeconomic status | Lowest quartile | 16.3 (14/86) | 1.00 | ||
| Second quartile | 8.1 (6/74) | 0.4 | 0.1–1.7 | 0.24 | |
| Third quartile | 15.5 (13.84) | 1.2 | 0.4–4.3 | 0.72 | |
| Highest quartile | 7.3 (6/82) | 0.6 | 0.1–2.6 | 0.46 | |
| Direct livestock contact | No | 10.4 (29/278) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 30 (9/30) | 6.2 | 1.04–37.5 | 0.04 | |
| Raw milk | No | 10 (20/199) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 19.0 (11/58) | 1.5 | 0.4–5 | 0.54 | |
| Heated milk | No | 20 (8/40) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 10.6 (23/217) | 1.01 | 0.2–4.2 | 0.98 | |
| FDP from market | No | 14.5 (24/165) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 7.6 (7.92) | 0.6 | 0.2–1.7 | 0.32 | |
| Homemade FDP | No | 9.9 (17/171) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 16.3 (14/86) | 1.6 | 0.6–4.1 | 0.29 | |
| Yogurt | No | 14.3 (32/223) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 6.9 (7/102) | 0.4 | 0.1–1.3 | 0.13 | |
| Poultry with skin | No | 8.9 (12/135) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 13.8 (26/188) | 2.1 | 0.8–5.7 | 0.14 | |
| Red meat | No | 14.2 (18/127) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 10.1 (19/189) | 0.6 | 0.2–1.5 | 0.29 |
aOR: odds ratio
bCI: confidence interval
cDaily routine with livestock and/or livestock primary products. Variables with a level of p 0.2 at the univariate analysis and those, which are biologically plausible, were selected for the model. However, those among them with very low observation in have not been fitted into the model (industrial cheese, ice cream, imported fermented dairy products (FDP), seafood). Correlation test has revealed strong association between such explanatory variables: residence area (A), livestock ownership (B), daily routine with livestock and/or livestock primary product (C) and artisanal butter (D). A: B(r = 0.6), A: C (0.9); A: D (0.8); B: C (0.6); C: D (0.7). The explanatory variable "B" was selected for the model.
Fig 4Phylogenetic tree of Sii of dairy, plant and human origin based on MLST profiles.
Sii isolates and meta data are indicated concerning sample type and geographic classification (A), country of sample/isolate origin (B) and presence of lacS/lacZ dairy adaptation (C) and highlighting of new isolates and STs added in this study (D).