Literature DB >> 31774330

Sleep assessment devices: types, market analysis, and a critical view on accuracy and validation.

Vanessa Ibáñez1, Josep Silva2, Esther Navarro1, Omar Cauli3.   

Abstract

Introduction: Sleep assessment devices are essential for the detection, diagnosis, and monitoring of sleep disorders. This paper provides a state-of-the-art review and comparison of sleep assessment devices and a market analysis.Areas covered: Hardware devices are classified into contact and contactless devices. For each group, the underlying technologies are presented, paying special attention to their limitations. A systematic literature review has been carried out by comparing the most important validation studies of sleep tracking devices in terms of sensitivity and specificity. A market analysis has also been carried out in order to list the most used, best-selling, and most highly-valued devices. Software apps have also been compared with regards to the market.Expert opinion: Thanks to technological advances, the reliability and accuracy of sensors has been significantly increased in recent years. According to validation studies, some actigraphs present a sensibility higher than 90%. However, the market analysis reveals that many hardware devices have not been validated, and especially software devices should be studied before their clinical use.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Actigraphy; sleep detection methods; sleep devices; sleep quality assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31774330     DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2019.1693890

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices        ISSN: 1743-4440            Impact factor:   3.166


  5 in total

1.  A standardized framework for testing the performance of sleep-tracking technology: step-by-step guidelines and open-source code.

Authors:  Luca Menghini; Nicola Cellini; Aimee Goldstone; Fiona C Baker; Massimiliano de Zambotti
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 5.849

2.  Bed Sensor Technology for Objective Sleep Monitoring Within the Clinical Rehabilitation Setting: Observational Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Maartje M S Hendriks; Jaap H van Lotringen; Marije Vos-van der Hulst; Noël L W Keijsers
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 4.773

3.  Agreement of Sleep Measures-A Comparison between a Sleep Diary and Three Consumer Wearable Devices.

Authors:  Kristina Klier; Matthias Wagner
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Evaluations of Commercial Sleep Technologies for Objective Monitoring During Routine Sleeping Conditions.

Authors:  Jason D Stone; Lauren E Rentz; Jillian Forsey; Jad Ramadan; Rachel R Markwald; Victor S Finomore; Scott M Galster; Ali Rezai; Joshua A Hagen
Journal:  Nat Sci Sleep       Date:  2020-10-27

5.  Multi-Night Validation of a Sleep Tracking Ring in Adolescents Compared with a Research Actigraph and Polysomnography.

Authors:  Nicholas I Y N Chee; Shohreh Ghorbani; Hosein Aghayan Golkashani; Ruth L F Leong; Ju Lynn Ong; Michael W L Chee
Journal:  Nat Sci Sleep       Date:  2021-02-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.