A M Isidori1, G Arnaldi2, M Boscaro3, A Falorni4, C Giordano5, R Giordano6, R Pivonello7, C Pozza8, E Sbardella8, C Simeoli7, C Scaroni3, A Lenzi8. 1. Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. Andrea.isidori@uniroma1.it. 2. Clinica di Endocrinologia e Malattie del Metabolismo, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy. 3. UOC Endocrinologia, Dipartimento di Medicina DIMED, Azienda Ospedaliera-Università di Padova, Padua, Italy. 4. Dipartimento di Medicina, Università di Perugia, Perugia, Italy. 5. Section of Diabetology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, PROMISE, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy. 6. Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism-Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy. 7. Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Chirurgia, Sezione di Endocrinologia, Università Federico II di Napoli, Naples, Italy. 8. Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Glucocorticoid (GC) replacement therapy in patients with adrenal insufficiency (AI) is life saving. After over 50 years of conventional GC treatment, novel formulations are now entering routine clinical practice. METHODS: Given the spectrum of medications currently available and new insights into the understanding of AI, the authors reviewed relevant medical literature with emphasis on original studies, prospective observational data and randomized controlled trials performed in the past 35 years. The Expert Opinion of a panel of selected endocrinologists was sought to answer specific clinical questions. The objective was to provide an evidence-supported guide, for the use of GC in various settings from university hospitals to outpatient clinics, that offers specific advice tailored to the individual patient. RESULTS: The Panel reviewed available GC replacement therapies, comprising short-acting, intermediate and long-acting oral formulations, subcutaneous formulations and the novel modified-release hydrocortisone. Advantages and disadvantages of these formulations were reviewed. CONCLUSIONS: In the Panel's opinion, achieving the optimal GC timing and dosing is needed to improve the outcome of AI. No-single formulation offers the best option for every patients. Recent data suggest that more emphasis should be given to the timing of intake. Tailoring of GS should be attempted in all patients-by experts-on a case-by-case basis. The Panel identified specific subgroups of AI patients that could be help by this process. Long-term studies are needed to confirm the short-term benefits associated with the modified-release GCs. The impact of GC tailoring has yet to be proven in terms of hospitalization rate, morbidity and mortality.
CONTEXT: Glucocorticoid (GC) replacement therapy in patients with adrenal insufficiency (AI) is life saving. After over 50 years of conventional GC treatment, novel formulations are now entering routine clinical practice. METHODS: Given the spectrum of medications currently available and new insights into the understanding of AI, the authors reviewed relevant medical literature with emphasis on original studies, prospective observational data and randomized controlled trials performed in the past 35 years. The Expert Opinion of a panel of selected endocrinologists was sought to answer specific clinical questions. The objective was to provide an evidence-supported guide, for the use of GC in various settings from university hospitals to outpatient clinics, that offers specific advice tailored to the individual patient. RESULTS: The Panel reviewed available GC replacement therapies, comprising short-acting, intermediate and long-acting oral formulations, subcutaneous formulations and the novel modified-release hydrocortisone. Advantages and disadvantages of these formulations were reviewed. CONCLUSIONS: In the Panel's opinion, achieving the optimal GC timing and dosing is needed to improve the outcome of AI. No-single formulation offers the best option for every patients. Recent data suggest that more emphasis should be given to the timing of intake. Tailoring of GS should be attempted in all patients-by experts-on a case-by-case basis. The Panel identified specific subgroups of AIpatients that could be help by this process. Long-term studies are needed to confirm the short-term benefits associated with the modified-release GCs. The impact of GC tailoring has yet to be proven in terms of hospitalization rate, morbidity and mortality.
Authors: Krystallenia I Alexandraki; Gregory A Kaltsas; Andrea M Isidori; Helen L Storr; Farhad Afshar; Ian Sabin; Scott A Akker; Shern L Chew; William M Drake; John P Monson; G Michael Besser; Ashley B Grossman Journal: Eur J Endocrinol Date: 2013-03-20 Impact factor: 6.664
Authors: Marianne Øksnes; Sophie Bensing; Anna-Lena Hulting; Olle Kämpe; Annika Hackemann; Gesine Meyer; Klaus Badenhoop; Corrado Betterle; Anna Parolo; Roberta Giordano; Alberto Falorni; Lucyna Papierska; Wojciech Jeske; Anna A Kasperlik-Zaluska; V Krishna K Chatterjee; Eystein S Husebye; Kristian Løvås Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2011-11-16 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Miguel Debono; Cyrus Ghobadi; Amin Rostami-Hodjegan; Hiep Huatan; Michael J Campbell; John Newell-Price; Ken Darzy; Deborah P Merke; Wiebke Arlt; Richard J Ross Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2009-02-17 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: N V Esteban; T Loughlin; A L Yergey; J K Zawadzki; J D Booth; J C Winterer; D L Loriaux Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 1991-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: F Ceccato; M Torchio; I Tizianel; M Peleg Falb; M Barbot; C Sabbadin; C Betterle; C Scaroni Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2022-08-10 Impact factor: 5.467
Authors: T Feola; R Sa Pirchio; G Puliani; R Pofi; M Crocco; V Sada; F Sesti; F Verdecchia; D Gianfrilli; M Appetecchia; N Di Iorgi; M L Jaffrain-Rea; R Pivonello; A M Isidori; A B Grossman; E Sbardella Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2022-08-24 Impact factor: 5.467
Authors: Marcus Quinkler; Robert D Murray; Pinggao Zhang; Claudio Marelli; Robert Petermann; Andrea M Isidori; Bertil Ekman Journal: Eur J Endocrinol Date: 2021-05-04 Impact factor: 6.664
Authors: A M Isidori; G Arnaldi; M Boscaro; A Falorni; C Giordano; R Giordano; R Pivonello; R Pofi; V Hasenmajer; M A Venneri; E Sbardella; C Simeoli; C Scaroni; A Lenzi Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2020-04-25 Impact factor: 4.256