Literature DB >> 31773533

A toxicity-based analysis of Canada's National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI): a case study in Nova Scotia.

Stephanie Taylor1, Stuart Johnston Edwards1, Tony R Walker2.   

Abstract

After the success of the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) in the United States (US), Canada created the National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI). Both NPRI and TRI focus on public opinion to coerce facilities to reduce quantities of emissions, through market pressure, although early reductions in Canada may be attributed to traditional command-and-control mechanisms. NPRI uses a quantity-based approach to report atmospheric and effluent releases of pollutants to air and water, but does not account for relative toxicity of releases, which could lead to harmful chemicals being overlooked. A toxicity-based approach using characterization factors from the USEtox® environmental impact assessment tool was used for this study. Releases of organic and inorganic pollutants to both air and water in Nova Scotia for 2015 were analyzed. Using an ecotoxicity analysis found that the highest priority chemicals identified using the NPRI's quantity-based approach differed markedly from those identified using the toxicity-based approach. Many of the high-priority chemicals identified using toxicity-based analysis are detrimental to ecosystem health and warrant regulatory attention. The Office of the Auditor General of Canada recently suggested that the Canadian federal government needs to improve control risks of toxic substances. Using a toxicity-based approach may help decision makers in the Canadian federal government effectively control risks of toxic substances and help to inform decision makers, regulators, and Canadians about those risks.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air and water quality; Canada; Ecotoxicity; Environmental pollution; National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI); USEtox®

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31773533     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-06933-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  9 in total

1.  Assessment of public perception and environmental compliance at a pulp and paper facility: a Canadian case study.

Authors:  Emma Hoffman; Meagan Bernier; Brenden Blotnicky; Peter G Golden; Jeffrey Janes; Allison Kader; Rachel Kovacs-Da Costa; Shauna Pettipas; Sarah Vermeulen; Tony R Walker
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Pilot study investigating ambient air toxics emissions near a Canadian kraft pulp and paper facility in Pictou County, Nova Scotia.

Authors:  Emma Hoffman; Judith R Guernsey; Tony R Walker; Jong Sung Kim; Kate Sherren; Pantelis Andreou
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Building a model based on scientific consensus for Life Cycle Impact Assessment of chemicals: the search for harmony and parsimony.

Authors:  Michael Z Hauschild; Mark Huijbregts; Olivier Jolliet; Matt MacLeod; Manuele Margni; Dik van de Meent; Ralph K Rosenbaum; Thomas E McKone
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Ecological risk assessment of metals in small craft harbour sediments in Nova Scotia, Canada.

Authors:  Hongling Zhang; Tony R Walker; Emily Davis; Guofeng Ma
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 5.553

5.  Combining U.S.-based prioritization tools to improve screening level accountability for environmental impact: the case of the chemical manufacturing industry.

Authors:  Xiaoying Zhou; Julie M Schoenung
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 10.588

6.  Improving substance information in USEtox® , part 1: Discussion on data and approaches for estimating freshwater ecotoxicity effect factors.

Authors:  Erwan Saouter; Karin Aschberger; Peter Fantke; Michael Z Hauschild; Stephanie K Bopp; Aude Kienzler; Alicia Paini; Rana Pant; Michela Secchi; Serenella Sala
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 3.742

7.  Quantity-based and toxicity-based evaluation of the U.S. Toxics Release Inventory.

Authors:  Seong-Rin Lim; Carl W Lam; Julie M Schoenung
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 10.588

8.  Drivers of U.S. toxicological footprints trajectory 1998-2013.

Authors:  S C L Koh; T Ibn-Mohammed; A Acquaye; K Feng; I M Reaney; K Hubacek; H Fujii; K Khatab
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The Australian National Pollutant Inventory Fails to Fulfil Its Legislated Goals.

Authors:  Nathan Cooper; Donna Green; Katrin J Meissner
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.