| Literature DB >> 31773355 |
Katrin N Sander1,2, Dong-Hyun Kim2, Catharine A Ortori2, Averil Y Warren1, Uchenna C Anyanwagu1, Daniel P Hay1, Fiona Broughton Pipkin3, Raheela N Khan4, David A Barrett2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Pre-eclampsia is a hypertensive gestational disorder that affects approximately 5% of all pregnancies.Entities:
Keywords: Metabolic profiling; Metabolomics; Pre-eclampsia; Pregnancy, human
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31773355 PMCID: PMC6879453 DOI: 10.1007/s11306-019-1600-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Metabolomics ISSN: 1573-3882 Impact factor: 4.290
Patient demographics for maternal plasma collected from control and pre-eclampsia cohort
| Control | Pre-eclampsia | p value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 35) | (n = 32) | |||
| Age (yrs) | 28.9 (6.7) | 30.2 (5.1) | > 0.05 | |
| BMI | 27.0 (7.0) | 28.0 (5.1) | > 0.05 | |
| Booking blood pressure systolic (mmHg) | 109.4 (8.4) | 112.6 (9.1) | > 0.05 | |
| Booking blood pressure diastolic (mmHg) | 63.6 (7.4) | 69.8 (8.7) | 0.003 | |
| Gestational age at sampling (wks) | 36.7 (3.2) | 35.9 (2.8) | > 0.05 | |
| Gestational age at delivery (wks) | 38.3 (2.0) | 36.9 (2.6) | 0.016 | |
| Birth weight baby (g) | 3149.1 (698.9) | 2543.6 (830.7) | 0.002 | |
| Customised weight centile baby | 48.2 (30.0) | 27.9 (31.0) | 0.008 | |
| Multiple pregnancy | Singleton | 35 (100%) | 28 (87.5%) | 0.031 |
| Twins | 0 | 4 (12.5%) | ||
| Parity | 0 | 14 (40.0%) | 22 (68.8%) | > 0.05 |
| 1 | 13 (37.1%) | 5 (15.6%) | ||
| 2 | 4 (11.4%) | 4 (12.5%) | ||
| 3 | 3 (8.6%) | 1 (3.1%) | ||
| 4 | 1 (2.9%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| Ethnicity | Africa | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (3.1%) | > 0.05 |
| India/Pakistan | 4 (11.4%) | 4 (12.5%) | ||
| Middle East | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (3.1%) | ||
| Southern/Northern Europe | 31 (88.6%) | 26 (81.3%) | ||
Table shows mean (standard deviation) or numbers (%) of n recruited patients. yrs years, wks weeks. Customised weight centiles were calculated using Weight Centile Calculator from GROW software version 6.7.7, 2016 (Gardosi et al. 1992, 1995). Significance testing was performed using student t-test (continuous variables) or Chi square test (categorical variables)
Fig. 1Multivariate analysis based on all detected ions: a OPLS-DA score plot of control (no hypertensive disease, nHD, n = 35) and pre-eclampsia (PET, n = 32) samples for all variables. b OPLS-DA score plot of training and prediction set for control (no hypertensive disease, nHD) and pre-eclampsia (PET) samples for all variables. c Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves for all variables. The figure shows the true positive fraction (TPF) with upper and lower 95% confidence intervals. The AUC is 0.922 with a standard error of 0.06
Fig. 2Multivariate analysis based on the 35 most predictive ions: a OPLS-DA score plot of control (no hypertensive disease, nHD, n = 35) and pre-eclampsia (PET, n = 32) samples for the 35 most predictive ions. b OPLS-DA score plots of training and prediction set for control (no hypertensive disease, nHD) and pre-eclampsia (PET) samples for the 35 most predictive ions. c Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves for the 35 most predictive ions. The figure shows the true positive fraction (TPF) with upper and lower 95% confidence intervals. The AUC is 0.964 with a standard error of 0.04
Fig. 3Scatter dot plots of potential biomarkers in the polar (a) and apolar (b) phase. All shown biomarkers fulfil criteria of both MVA and UVA. MVA criteria were a VIP value > 1 in the OPLS-DA model shown in Fig. 1c. Criteria for UVA were a q-value < 0.05 (*), a fold change > 1.5 and CV(QC) < 30%. Dots show log(1 + normalised intensity) of control (n = 35) and pre-eclampsia (PET, n = 32) samples. Error bars represent median and interquartile ranges. For more details see supplemental data (Tables 1, 2 and Table 3)