Literature DB >> 31772974

Novel Hybrid Scattering- and Scanning-Beam Proton Therapy Approach.

Shengpeng Jiang1,2, Jingqian Wang1, Heng Li1, Li Liao1, Yupeng Li1,3, Xiaochun Wang1, Yining Yang1,4, Ronald X Zhu1, Narayan Sahoo1, Michael T Gillin1, Yoshifumi Hojo1, Jian Sun1,2, Joe Y Chang5, Zhongxing Liao5, David Grosshans5, Steven J Frank5, Xiaodong Zhang1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether a hybrid intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and passive scattered proton therapy (PSPT) technique, termed HimpsPT, could be adopted as an alternative delivery method for patients demanding scanning beam proton therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified 3 representative clinical cases-an oropharyngeal cancer, skull base chordoma, and stage III non-small-cell lung cancer-that had been treated with IMPT at our center. We retrospectively redesigned these cases using HimpsPT. The PSPT plans for all three cases were designed with the same prescriptions as those used in the IMPT plans. In this way, the whole treatment was delivered using alternating or sequential PSPT and IMPT.
RESULTS: All HimpsPT plans met the clinical dose criteria and were of similar quality as the IMPT plans. In the skull base case, the mixed plan was more effective at sparing the brain stem because the sharp penumbra of the aperture in the PSPT plans was not present in the IMPT plans. The HimpsPT plans were more robust than the clinical IMPT plans generated without robust optimization.
CONCLUSION: The HimpsPT delivery technique can achieve a treatment-plan quality similar to that of IMPT, even in the most challenging clinical cases. In addition, at centers equipped with both scattering and scanning beam capabilities, the HimpsPT technique may allow more patients to benefit from scanning beam technology. © Copyright 2016 International Journal of Particle Therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hybrid, optimization; intensity-modulated proton therapy; passive scattered proton therapy

Year:  2016        PMID: 31772974      PMCID: PMC6871576          DOI: 10.14338/IJPT-15-00014.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Part Ther        ISSN: 2331-5180


  23 in total

1.  Intensity modulation methods for proton radiotherapy.

Authors:  A Lomax
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Hybrid IMRT plans--concurrently treating conventional and IMRT beams for improved breast irradiation and reduced planning time.

Authors:  Charles S Mayo; Marcia M Urie; Thomas J Fitzgerald
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 3.  Motion in radiotherapy: particle therapy.

Authors:  C Bert; M Durante
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Clinical experience and expectation with protons and heavy ions.

Authors:  H D Suit; M Goitein; J E Tepper; L Verhey; A M Koehler; R Schneider; E Gragoudas
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Compensation for inhomogeneities in charged particle radiotherapy using computed tomography.

Authors:  M Goitein
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1978 May-Jun       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Flattening of proton dose distributions for large-field radiotherapy.

Authors:  A M Koehler; R J Schneider; J M Sisterson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1977 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  A treatment planning comparison of 3D conformal therapy, intensity modulated photon therapy and proton therapy for treatment of advanced head and neck tumours.

Authors:  L Cozzi; A Fogliata; A Lomax; A Bolsi
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  Proton radiation therapy for pediatric medulloblastoma and supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumors: outcomes for very young children treated with upfront chemotherapy.

Authors:  Rachel B Jimenez; Roshan Sethi; Nicolas Depauw; Margaret B Pulsifer; Judith Adams; Sean M McBride; David Ebb; Barbara C Fullerton; Nancy J Tarbell; Torunn I Yock; Shannon M Macdonald
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  The superiority of hybrid-volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) technique over double arcs VMAT and 3D-conformal technique in the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer--a planning study.

Authors:  Oscar S H Chan; Michael C H Lee; Albert W M Hung; Amy T Y Chang; Rebecca M W Yeung; Anne W M Lee
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 6.280

10.  Spot-scanning beam proton therapy vs intensity-modulated radiation therapy for ipsilateral head and neck malignancies: a treatment planning comparison.

Authors:  Shravan Kandula; Xiaorong Zhu; Adam S Garden; Michael Gillin; David I Rosenthal; Kie-Kian Ang; Radhe Mohan; Mayankkumar V Amin; John A Garcia; Richard Wu; Narayan Sahoo; Steven J Frank
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 1.482

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Proton beam therapy for skull base chordomas: a systematic review of tumor control rates and survival rates.

Authors:  Bhavya Pahwa; Khalid Medani; Victor M Lu; Turki Elarjani
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 2.800

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.