Literature DB >> 31771963

Adoption of enhanced recovery after laparotomy in gynecologic oncology.

Ana Sofia Ore1, Matthew A Shear1,2, Fong W Liu1,2, John L Dalrymple1,2, Christopher S Awtrey1,2, Leslie Garrett1,2, Hannah Stack-Dunnbier1, Michele R Hacker1,2, Katharine McKinley Esselen3,2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways combine a comprehensive set of peri-operative practices that have been demonstrated to hasten patient post-operative recovery. We aimed to evaluate the adoption of ERAS components and assess attitudes towards ERAS among gynecologic oncologists.
METHODS: We developed and administered a cross-sectional survey of attending, fellow, and resident physicians who were members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology in January 2018. The χ2 test was used to compare adherence to individual components of ERAS.
RESULTS: There was a 23% survey response rate and we analyzed 289 responses: 79% were attending physicians, 57% were from academic institutions, and 64% were from institutions with an established ERAS pathway. Respondents from ERAS institutions were significantly more likely to adhere to recommendations regarding pre-operative fasting for liquids (ERAS 51%, non-ERAS 28%; p<0.001), carbohydrate loading (63% vs 16%; p<0.001), intra-operative fluid management (78% vs 32%; p<0.001), and extended duration of deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis for malignancy (69% vs 55%; p=0.003). We found no difference in the use of mechanical bowel preparation, use of peritoneal drainage, or use of nasogastric tubes between ERAS and non-ERAS institutions. Nearly all respondents (92%) felt that ERAS pathways were safe. DISCUSSION: Practicing at an institution with an ERAS pathway increased adoption of many ERAS elements; however, adherence to certain guidelines remains highly variable. Use of bowel preparation, nasogastric tubes, and peritoneal drainage catheters remain common. Future work should identify barriers to the implementation of ERAS and its components. © IGCS and ESGO 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  laparotomy; postoperative care; preoperative care; surgical oncology

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31771963      PMCID: PMC8939246          DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  25 in total

1.  Guidelines for pre- and intra-operative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations--Part I.

Authors:  G Nelson; A D Altman; A Nick; L A Meyer; P T Ramirez; C Achtari; J Antrobus; J Huang; M Scott; L Wijk; N Acheson; O Ljungqvist; S C Dowdy
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 2.  A systematic review to assess cost effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery programmes in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  D P Lemanu; P P Singh; M D J Stowers; A G Hill
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 3.  Enhanced recovery pathways in gynecologic oncology.

Authors:  Gregg Nelson; Eleftheria Kalogera; Sean C Dowdy
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Reduced length of hospital stay in colorectal surgery after implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol.

Authors:  Timothy E Miller; Julie K Thacker; William D White; Christopher Mantyh; John Migaly; Juying Jin; Anthony M Roche; Eric L Eisenstein; Rex Edwards; Kevin J Anstrom; Richard E Moon; Tong J Gan
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 5.  Extended thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) following abdominopelvic cancer surgery.

Authors:  Marc Carrier; Alon D Altman; Normand Blais; Artemis Diamantouros; Deanna McLeod; Uthaman Moodley; Christine Nguyen; Stephanie Young; Frank Schwenter
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2018-12-16       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Prolonged thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin for abdominal or pelvic surgery.

Authors:  Seth Felder; Morten Schnack Rasmussen; Ray King; Bradford Sklow; Mary Kwaan; Robert Madoff; Christine Jensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-08-26

7.  Evaluating Mechanical Bowel Preparation Prior to Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Nicholas A Ryan; Vicki Sue-Mei Ng; Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar; Xiaoming Guan
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

8.  Are we ready for the ERAS protocol in colorectal surgery?

Authors:  Michał Kisielewski; Mateusz Rubinkiewicz; Michał Pędziwiatr; Magdalena Pisarska; Marcin Migaczewski; Marcin Dembiński; Piotr Major; Kazimierz Rembiasz; Andrzej Budzyński
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 1.195

9.  Guidelines for postoperative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations--Part II.

Authors:  G Nelson; A D Altman; A Nick; L A Meyer; P T Ramirez; C Achtari; J Antrobus; J Huang; M Scott; L Wijk; N Acheson; O Ljungqvist; S C Dowdy
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-01-03       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Application of enhanced recovery after surgery in patients undergoing radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Chunxiao Wei; Fengchun Wan; Haiwei Zhao; Jiajia Ma; Zhenli Gao; Chunhua Lin
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 1.671

View more
  4 in total

1.  Variations in Volume and Costs of Inpatient Admissions for Female Pelvic Reconstructive Procedures Across the United States.

Authors:  Rui Wang; Paul Tulikangas; Michele R Hacker
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 1.913

2.  Risk factors of deep vein thrombosis of lower extremity in patients undergone gynecological laparoscopic surgery: what should we care.

Authors:  Qing Tian; Meng Li
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 2.809

3.  Level of ERAS understanding affects practitioners' practice and perception of early postoperative resumption of oral intake: a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Huizhen Huang; Yuelun Zhang; Le Shen; Yuguang Huang
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 2.217

4.  Evaluation of perioperative management of advanced ovarian (tubal/peritoneal) cancer patients: a survey from MITO-MaNGO Groups.

Authors:  Stefano Greggi; Francesca Falcone; Giovanni D Aletti; Marco Cascella; Francesca Bifulco; Nicoletta Colombo; Sandro Pignata
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 4.756

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.