| Literature DB >> 31771563 |
Noureldin Abuelfadl Ghazy1,2, Tetsuo Gotoh3, Takeshi Suzuki4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The tomato red spider mite, Tetranychus evansi Baker & Pritchard (Acari: Tetranychidae), is an agricultural pest of solanaceous crops. Although T. evansi is of South American subtropical origin, it has recently expanded its distribution range to many tropical and temperate areas around the world. Its potential distribution range in response to scenarios of global warming was recently modeled, confirming its current and possible future distributions. Here, we experimentally investigated the biological traits of T. evansi in the context of the current and future global warming (2100) scenarios. Using an environmental simulation system, we tested the life-history traits of T. evansi under current summer temperatures (as of June, July, and August 2016) and under expected temperature increases based on two IPCC scenarios: RCP2.6 (+ 1 °C) and RCP8.5 (+ 3.7 °C). The mites were introduced into each scenario on 1 June and their sequential progeny were used for testing in each following month.Entities:
Keywords: Biological invasion; Climate change; Life table; Pest; Simulation; Tomato red spider mite
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31771563 PMCID: PMC6880604 DOI: 10.1186/s12898-019-0264-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Ecol ISSN: 1472-6785 Impact factor: 2.964
Fig. 1Simulated global warming scenarios. “Current,” natural temperature measured at 10-min interval (Japan Meteorological Agency); RCP2.6, current temperature increased by 1 °C; RCP8.5, current temperature increased by 3.7 °C. Mites were introduced to these conditions on 1 June and their sequential progeny were used in each subsequent month
Fig. 2Pearson correlation coefficient (r) of the relationships between set and measured values of temperature in the simulation system under the three scenarios
Two-way ANOVA of factors (months and Representative Concentration Pathway [RCP] scenarios) affecting immature development time (egg-to-adult), lifespan, and reproduction of Tetranychus evansi
| Parameter | Source | df | MS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Egg-to-adult | Month | 2 | 34.74 | 3992.26 | < 0.001 |
| RCP | 2 | 8.03 | 922.94 | < 0.001 | |
| Interaction | 4 | 0.19 | 21.33 | < 0.001 | |
| Residuals | 484 | 0.01 | – | – | |
| Lifespan | Month | 2 | 33.17 | 41.98 | < 0.001 |
| RCP | 2 | 29.65 | 37.53 | < 0.001 | |
| Interaction | 4 | 3.86 | 4.89 | 0.001 | |
| Residuals | 469 | 0.79 | – | – | |
| Reproduction | Month | 2 | 67.16 | 11.58 | < 0.001 |
| RCP | 2 | 131.42 | 22.66 | < 0.001 | |
| Interaction | 4 | 81.21 | 14.00 | < 0.001 | |
| Residuals | 422 | 5.80 | – | – |
Effects of simulated global warming scenarios on number of days to development at each stage, survival rate to adult, and adult longevity and lifespan of Tetranychus evansi
| Parameter | Global warming scenario | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current | RCP2.6 | RCP8.5 | ||||
| June | ||||||
| Hatchability (%) | 129 | 96.9 ± 1.5 a | 176 | 94.3 ± 1.7 a | 231 | 93.1 ± 1.7 a |
| Egg | 51 | 8.0 ± 0.0 a | 66 | 7.8 ± 0.1 a | 61 | 5.7 ± 0.1 b |
| Larva | 47 | 2.3 ± 0.1 a | 62 | 2.2 ± 0.1 a | 61 | 2.7 ± 0.1 b |
| Protonymph | 44 | 2.9 ± 0.1 a | 59 | 2.0 ± 0.1 b | 59 | 1.7 ± 0.1 c |
| Deutonymph | 43 | 3.0 ± 0.1 a | 57 | 3.3 ± 0.1 b | 58 | 2.1 ± 0.1 c |
| Egg-to-adult | 43 | 16.1 ± 0.1 a | 57 | 15.3 ± 0.1 b | 58 | 12.2 ± 0.1 c |
| Survival rate (%) | 77 | 90.6 ± 3.3 a | 77 | 87.0 ± 3.8 a | 80 | 89.6 ± 3.4 a |
| Longevity | 36 | 18.2 ± 1.6 a | 51 | 17.3 ± 1.0 a | 45 | 10.2 ± 1.0 b |
| Lifespan | 41 | 31.5 ± 1.8 a | 57 | 30.2 ± 1.3 a | 51 | 21.1 ± 0.9 b |
| July | ||||||
| Hatchability (%) | 112 | 98.2 ± 1.3 a | 106 | 99.1 ± 0.9 a | 104 | 98.1 ± 1.3 a |
| Egg | 65 | 4.7 ± 0.1 a | 60 | 4.3 ± 0.1 b | 58 | 3.3 ± 0.1 c |
| Larva | 65 | 2.3 ± 0.1 a | 60 | 2.1 ± 0.1 b | 58 | 1.9 ± 0.1 c |
| Protonymph | 65 | 2.0 ± 0.0 a | 58 | 1.8 ± 0.1 b | 57 | 1.4 ± 0.1 c |
| Deutonymph | 64 | 1.9 ± 0.1 a | 58 | 1.8 ± 0.1 a | 54 | 1.8 ± 0.1 a |
| Egg-to-adult | 64 | 11.0 ± 0.1 a | 58 | 10.0 ± 0.1 b | 54 | 8.5 ± 0.1 c |
| Survival rate (%) | 75 | 96.9 ± 2.0 a | 74 | 96.4 ± 2.2 a | 76 | 92.9 ± 2.9 a |
| Longevity | 61 | 13.9 ± 0.9 a | 54 | 17.1 ± 0.8 b | 50 | 16.1 ± 1.1 ab |
| Lifespan | 62 | 24.7 ± 0.9 a | 58 | 25.9 ± 1.0 a | 54 | 23.2 ± 1.2 a |
| August | ||||||
| Hatchability (%) | 207 | 96.6 ± 1.3 a | 146 | 93.8 ± 2.0 a | 310 | 91.3 ± 1.6 a |
| Egg | 68 | 4.0 ± 0.0 a | 60 | 3.8 ± 0.1 a | 62 | 3.4 ± 0.1 b |
| Larva | 68 | 2.0 ± 0.0 a | 56 | 1.4 ± 0.1 b | 59 | 1.4 ± 0.1 b |
| Protonymph | 67 | 1.2 ± 0.1 a | 42 | 1.7 ± 0.1 b | 56 | 1.2 ± 0.1 a |
| Deutonymph | 65 | 2.1 ± 0.1 a | 42 | 1.4 ± 0.1 b | 52 | 1.2 ± 0.1 b |
| Egg-to-adult | 65 | 9.2 ± 0.1 a | 42 | 8.4 ± 0.1 b | 52 | 7.2 ± 0.1 c |
| Survival rate (%) | 78 | 92.9 ± 2.9 a | 67 | 86.8 ± 4.1 a | 78 | 79.6 ± 4.6 a |
| Longevity | 48 | 15.5 ± 1.0 a | 37 | 15.5 ± 1.0 a | 50 | 8.4 ± 0.5 b |
| Lifespan | 51 | 23.5 ± 1.1 a | 42 | 21.7 ± 1.3 a | 62 | 13.5 ± 0.7 b |
Data are mean ± SEM, in days unless noted otherwise. Values with the same letter in rows are not significantly different (P > 0.05)
Effects of simulated global warming scenarios on length of reproductive phases, fecundity, and sex ratio of Tetranychus evansi
| Parameter | Global warming scenario | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current | RCP2.6 | RCP8.5 | ||||
| June | ||||||
| Pre-oviposition | 36 | 1.2 ± 0.1 a | 56 | 1.0 ± 0.0 b | 51 | 1.3 ± 0.1 a |
| Oviposition | 36 | 16.0 ± 1.5 a | 51 | 15.0 ± 0.9 a | 45 | 8.5 ± 0.8 b |
| Post-oviposition | 36 | 1.0 ± 0.2 ab | 51 | 1.3 ± 0.2 a | 45 | 0.5 ± 0.2 b |
| Eggs/female (no.) | 36 | 93.1 ± 8.5 a | 51 | 90.6 ± 5.9 a | 45 | 50.6 ± 5.3 b |
| ♀ ratio (%) | 197 | 87.3 ± 2.4 a | 177 | 85.9 ± 2.6 a | 171 | 87.7 ± 2.5 a |
| July | ||||||
| Pre-oviposition | 63 | 1.3 ± 0.1 a | 56 | 0.9 ± 0.0 b | 54 | 1.0 ± 0.1 b |
| Oviposition | 61 | 12.0 ± 0.8 a | 54 | 15.4 ± 0.7 b | 50 | 14.2 ± 1.0 ab |
| Post-oviposition | 61 | 0.6 ± 0.2 a | 54 | 0.9 ± 0.2 a | 50 | 0.9 ± 0.2 a |
| Eggs/female (no.) | 61 | 78.2 ± 5.7 a | 54 | 105.8 ± 5.6 b | 50 | 108.8 ± 8.1 b |
| ♀ ratio (%) | 442 | 91.4 ± 1.3 a | 433 | 91.7 ± 1.3 a | 383 | 90.6 ± 1.5 a |
| August | ||||||
| Pre-oviposition | 65 | 1.1 ± 0.0 a | 40 | 1.0 ± 0.0 b | 50 | 1.0 ± 0.1 ab |
| Oviposition | 48 | 13.5 ± 1.0 a | 37 | 14.0 ± 0.9 a | 50 | 7.0 ± 0.5 b |
| Post-oviposition | 48 | 0.9 ± 0.2 a | 37 | 0.6 ± 0.2 a | 50 | 0.4 ± 0.1 a |
| Eggs/female (no.) | 48 | 89.6 ± 4.9 a | 37 | 97.1 ± 5.5 a | 50 | 45.4 ± 3.6 b |
| ♀ ratio (%) | 425 | 83.5 ± 1.8 a | 292 | 86.3 ± 2.0 a | 331 | 79.1 ± 2.2 a |
Data are mean ± SEM, in days unless otherwise stated. Values with the same letter in rows are not significantly different (P > 0.05)
Fig. 3Age-specific survival rate (l) and age-specific fecundity (m) of Tetranychus evansi under different global warming scenarios
Effects of simulated global warming scenarios on life-table parameters of Tetranychus evansi
| Parameter | Global warming scenario | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current | RCP2.6 | RCP8.5 | ||||
| June | ||||||
| | 41 | 72.2 ± 8.8 a | 59 | 73.3 ± 6.5 a | 55 | 39.3 ± 5.0 b |
| | 23.9 ± 0.3 a | 22.2 ± 0.2 b | 17.8 ± 0.3 c | |||
| | 0.178 ± 0.004 a | 0.193 ± 0.004 ab | 0.205 ± 0.006 b | |||
| | 1.195 ± 0.006 a | 1.213 ± 0.004 ab | 1.228 ± 0.007 b | |||
| | 3.9 ± 0.1 a | 3.6 ± 0.1 ab | 3.4 ± 0.1 b | |||
| July | ||||||
| | 67 | 70.1 ± 5.8 a | 59 | 93.6 ± 6.5 b | 53 | 90.6 ± 8.8 ab |
| | 17.3 ± 0.3 a | 16.7 ± 0.1 a | 15.1 ± 0.2 b | |||
| | 0.245 ± 0.005 a | 0.272 ± 0.004 b | 0.298 ± 0.006 c | |||
| | 1.278 ± 0.006 a | 1.312 ± 0.005 b | 1.347 ± 0.008 c | |||
| | 2.8 ± 0.1 a | 2.6 ± 0.0 b | 2.3 ± 0.0 c | |||
| August | ||||||
| | 58 | 73.9 ± 6.0 a | 43 | 77.5 ± 7.5 a | 75 | 30.1 ± 3.4 b |
| | 16.4 ± 0.2 a | 15.3 ± 0.1 b | 12.9 ± 0.1 c | |||
| | 0.262 ± 0.004 a | 0.283 ± 0.006 b | 0.264 ± 0.008 ab | |||
| | 1.300 ± 0.006 a | 1.328 ± 0.008 b | 1.302 ± 0.011 ab | |||
| | 2.6 ± 0.0 a | 2.4 ± 0.1 b | 2.6 ± 0.1 ab | |||
Data are mean ± SEM. Values with the same letter in rows are not significantly different at P < 0.05 by using paired bootstrap test
R0, net reproductive rate; T, generation time; rm, intrinsic rate of population increase; λ, finite rate of population increase; D, population doubling time