| Literature DB >> 31771145 |
Matteo Gillono1,2, Annalisa Chiappone1, Lorenzo Mendola1, Manuel Gomez Gomez1, Luciano Scaltrito1, Candido Fabrizio Pirri1,2, Ignazio Roppolo1.
Abstract
Here we present new 3D printable materials based on the introduction of different commercially available ionic liquids (ILs) in the starting formulations. We evaluate the influence of these additives on the printability of such formulations through light-induced 3D printing (digital light processing-DLP), investigating as well the effect of ionic liquids with polymerizable groups. The physical chemical properties of such materials are compared, focusing on the permeability towards CO2 of the different ILs present in the formulations. At last, we show the possibility of 3D printing high complexity structures, which could be the base of new high complexity filters for a more efficient CO2 capture.Entities:
Keywords: 3D printing; CO2 capture; digital light processing; ionic liquids
Year: 2019 PMID: 31771145 PMCID: PMC6960677 DOI: 10.3390/polym11121932
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Ionic liquids tested in this study.
| Butyl-3-Methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate Bmim[BF4] | |
| 1-Butyl-3-Methylimidazolium bis (trifluorometilsulfonyl)imide Bmim[Tf2N] | 1-Allyl-3-Methylimidazolium bis (trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide Amim[Tf2N] |
| 1-Butyl-3-Methylimidazolium acetate Bmim[ac] | 1,4-Butandiyl-3,3′-bis-1-vinylimidazoliumbis (trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide Bvim[Tf2N] |
Layer exposure times needed for the samples.
| Sample | Layer Exposure Time (s) | |
|---|---|---|
| Membrane | Cubic Filter-Like | |
| PEGDA | 1 | 2 |
| P_Bmim[BF4] | 1 | 1.7 |
| P_Bmim[Tf2N] | 1 | 2 |
| P_C4NMA,11[Tf2N] | 1 | 1.8 |
| P_Amim[Tf2N] | 2 | Not obtained |
| P_Bvim[Tf2N] | 1 | 1.7 |
Figure 1Photorheology tests of PEGDA/ionic liquid (IL) formulations containing different ILs and neat PEGDA as reference. Light irradiation starts after 12 s.
Figure 23D printed complex structure (hollow cube).
Ionic liquid content in the samples in relation to the weight variation after solvent treatment.
| Sample | Ionic Liquid Concentration (wt %) | Weight Variation (wt %) | υ (mmol/cm3) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEGDA | 0 | 0 | −19.9 | −17 | 10.8 |
| P_Bmim[BF4] | 9 | 8.5 | −22.6 | −21.3 | 1.3 |
| P_Bmim[Tf2N] | 15.1 | 13.9 | −22.5 | −21.6 | 1.4 |
| P_C4NMA,11[Tf2N] | 17.5 | 0 | −15.1 | −12.8 | 1.6 |
| P_Amim[Tf2N] | 14.7 | 14.2 | −44.8 | Not calculated | - |
| P_Bvim[Tf2N] | 14.7 | 0 | −11.2 | −10 | 12.2 |
Calculated diffusivity (D), solubility (S) and permeability (P) values for 3D printed membranes containing different ionic liquids.
| Sample |
| S |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| PEGDA | 6.73 | 4.71 | 3.17 |
| P_Bmim[BF4] | 11.33 | 2.99 | 3.39 |
| P_Bmim[Tf2N] | 8.65 | 5.26 | 4.55 |
| P_C4NMA,11[Tf2N] | 4.46 | 4.22 | 1.88 |
| P_Amim[Tf2N] | 9.53 | 14.47 | 13.79 |
| P_Bvim[Tf2N] | 8.45 | 3.20 | 2.70 |
Figure 3FT-IR of P_Bmim[BF4] in the CO2 absorption area after different absorption/desorption steps.
Figure 4Gyroid-like structures printed with P_Bmim[BF4].