Kendrick M Wang1, Albert S Jun1, John G Ladas2, Aazim A Siddiqui3, Fasika Woreta1, Divya Srikumaran4. 1. Wilmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 2. Wilmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Maryland Eye Consultants and Surgeons, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA. 3. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA. 4. Wilmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Electronic address: dsrikum1@jhmi.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the refractive accuracy of current intraocular lens (IOL) formulas in eyes with keratoconus. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: Preoperative optical biometry, Pentacam topography, and postoperative outcomes were collected from eyes with keratoconus that had uncomplicated cataract surgery between 2014 and 2018 at a single institution. Exclusion criteria include postoperative best-corrected spectacle visual acuity worse than 20/40, multifocal lens, prior ophthalmic surgeries, and prior ocular trauma. The Hoffer Q, SRK/T, Holladay I, Holladay II, Haigis, and Barrett Universal II formulas were analyzed in each eye stratified by keratoconus severity. RESULTS: A total of 73 eyes were included. All formulas had a positive mean predicted error ranging from 0.10 to 4.38 diopters (D). The Barrett Universal II formula had the lowest median absolute error for stage I (n = 46, 0.445 D) and II (n = 22, 0.445 D) eyes, and the highest percentage of eyes with predicted error within ±0.50 D for both stage I (52%) and II (50%) eyes. In stage III eyes (n = 5), the Haigis formula had the lowest median predicated error (1.90 D) and the highest percentage of eyes with predicted error within ±0.50 D (40%). Corneal power measured by optical biometers was higher than measurements by Pentacam keratometry. CONCLUSIONS: All formulas tend to have a hyperopic surprise. The Barrett Universal II formula was the most accurate for mild to moderate disease. Pentacam keratometry may help avoid hyperopic outcomes.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the refractive accuracy of current intraocular lens (IOL) formulas in eyes with keratoconus. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: Preoperative optical biometry, Pentacam topography, and postoperative outcomes were collected from eyes with keratoconus that had uncomplicated cataract surgery between 2014 and 2018 at a single institution. Exclusion criteria include postoperative best-corrected spectacle visual acuity worse than 20/40, multifocal lens, prior ophthalmic surgeries, and prior ocular trauma. The Hoffer Q, SRK/T, Holladay I, Holladay II, Haigis, and Barrett Universal II formulas were analyzed in each eye stratified by keratoconus severity. RESULTS: A total of 73 eyes were included. All formulas had a positive mean predicted error ranging from 0.10 to 4.38 diopters (D). The Barrett Universal II formula had the lowest median absolute error for stage I (n = 46, 0.445 D) and II (n = 22, 0.445 D) eyes, and the highest percentage of eyes with predicted error within ±0.50 D for both stage I (52%) and II (50%) eyes. In stage III eyes (n = 5), the Haigis formula had the lowest median predicated error (1.90 D) and the highest percentage of eyes with predicted error within ±0.50 D (40%). Corneal power measured by optical biometers was higher than measurements by Pentacam keratometry. CONCLUSIONS: All formulas tend to have a hyperopic surprise. The Barrett Universal II formula was the most accurate for mild to moderate disease. Pentacam keratometry may help avoid hyperopic outcomes.