| Literature DB >> 31770378 |
Xia Liu1, James Blackar Mawolo1, Xiaohua Du2, Yingjie Zhou3, Haifang Wang1, Fayang Liu1, Zhiqing He3, Haqi Astika Marela1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Saiga antelope (Saiga tatarica) is a critically endangered species, and there has been limited success in restoring the population by captive breeding. This study assessed the biochemical and physiological parameters of newborn Saiga antelope to provide reference information that can be used to evaluate their health. Comparisons have been made with parameters for horses and closely related members of the Bovidae family but there are no reference values for the newborn Saiga antelope.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31770378 PMCID: PMC6879164 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224822
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Descriptive ranges of biochemical parameters.
| Variables | COUNT | MEAN ± SD | MIN | MAX | Quantiles | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25% | 50% | 75% | |||||
| 89.00 | 345.72 | -206.00 | 738.00 | 272.00 | 332.00 | 428.00 | |
| 89.00 | 0.95 | 0.01 | 2.92 | 0.37 | 0.83 | 1.53 | |
| 89.00 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 1.83 | 0.66 | 0.86 | 1.14 | |
| 00 | 0.29 | -0.01 | 0.70 | 0.17 | 0.24 | 0.39 | |
| 89.00 | 0.24 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.16 | 0.21 | 0.29 | |
| 89.00 | 7.75 | 1.16 | 12.49 | 6.35 | 8.43 | 9.58 | |
| 89.00 | 8.13 | -0.71 | 13.42 | 6.02 | 8.42 | 10.11 | |
| 89.00 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 0.58 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.24 | |
| 89.00 | 37.30 | 1.23 | 65.45 | 31.83 | 39.31 | 44.04 | |
| 89.00 | 8.59 | 4.08 | 1.97 | 6.14 | 1.16 | 1.55 | |
| 89.00 | 1.82 | -23.90 | 19.00 | -2.00 | 1.00 | 7.00 | |
| 89.00 | 628.95 | 19.14 | 907.00 | 531.00 | 661.00 | 738.00 | |
| 89.00 | 1.66 | 1.20 | 1.97 | 1.60 | 1.64 | 1.77 | |
| 89.00 | 0.05 | -0.11 | 0.22 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.10 | |
| 89.00 | 2.61 | 1.23 | 7.25 | 2.01 | 2.50 | 3.01 | |
SD = standard deviation, MIN = minimum value, and MAX = maximum value
Descriptive ranges of physiological parameters.
| Variables | COUNT | MEAN ± SD | MIN | MAX | Quantiles | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25% | 50% | 75% | |||||
| 40.00 | 2.46 | 1.10 | 4.50 | 1.97 | 2.50 | 2.85 | |
| 00 | 18.59 | 12.10 | 29.80 | 16.27 | 17.95 | 20.70 | |
| 40.00 | 16.49 | 7.70 | 35, 100 | 11.17 | 13.30 | 18.07 | |
| 40.00 | 64.90 | 42.20 | 79.10 | 59.52 | 67.65 | 71.90 | |
| 40.00 | 151.33 | -22.00 | 535.00 | 276.50 | 334.00 | 424.75 | |
| 40.00 | 73.59 | 0.01 | 2.80 | 0.21 | 0.46 | 1.24 | |
| 40.00 | 6.60 | -0.01 | 0.70 | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.43 | |
SD = standard deviation, MIN = minimum value and MAX = maximum value
Comparison of biochemical parameters for female and male newborn Saiga antelope.
| Female | Male | P-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | n | Mean ± SD | n | Mean ± SD | |
| 50 | 36.66 ±34.332 | 36 | 52.056 ± 58.931 | 0.1311 | |
| 50 | 0.76 ± 0.483 | 36 | 1.238 ± 0.914 | ||
| 50 | 0.89 ± 0.345 | 36 | 1.027 ± 0.413 | 0.0888 | |
| 50 | 0.27 ± 0.154 | 36 | 0.338 ± 0.176 | 0.0766 | |
| 50 | 0.23 ± 0.095 | 36 | 0.276 ± 0.108 | ||
| 50 | 8.24 ± 2.156 | 36 | 7.446 ± 2.916 | 0.1522 | |
| 50 | 8.73 ± 2.693 | 36 | 7.964 ± 2.206 | 0.1628 | |
| 50 | 0.15 ± 0.145 | 36 | 0.178 ± 0.127 | 0.3752 | |
| 50 | 39.66 ± 16.621 | 36 | 39.218 ± 8.123 | 0.8818 | |
| 50 | 24.60 ± 6.246 | 36 | 23.633 ± 6.676 | 0.4943 | |
| 50 | 5.22 ±16.621 | 36 | 31.167 ± 136.371 | 0.1856 | |
| 50 | 652.46 ± 196.890 | 36 | 631.806 ± 136.371 | 0.5895 | |
| 50 | 740.56 ± 348.729 | 36 | 501.639 ± 225.249 | ||
| 50 | -1.67 ± 0.098 | 36 | -1.673 ± 0.135 | 0.9476 | |
| 50 | 0.05 ± 0.084 | 36 | -0.203 ± 1.681 | 0.2858 | |
| 50 | 2.54 ± 1.141 | 36 | 2.629 ± 0.632 | 0.6707 | |
SD = standard deviation values, n = number of samples, t-test P-value (
*p<0.05
**P<0.001
***P<0.0001)
Comparison of physiological/hematological parameters for female and male newborn Saiga antelope.
| Female | Male | P-Value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | n | Mean ± SD | n | Mean ± SD | |
| 18 | 2.48 ± 0.91 | 21 | 2.38 ± 0.78 | 0.7067 | |
| 18 | 19.51 ± 4.46 | 21 | 18.03 ± 3.19 | 0.2386 | |
| 18 | 16.15 ± 8.12 | 21 | 17.21 ± 8.25 | 0.6894 | |
| 18 | 64.33 ± 10.12 | 21 | 64.76 ± 10.00 | 0.8963 | |
| 18 | 0.49 ± 0.24 | 21 | 0.41 ± 0.13 | 0.1915 | |
| 18 | 0.36 ± 0.17 | 21 | 0.39 ± 0.24 | 0.6628 | |
| 18 | 1.63 ± 0.67 | 21 | 1.58 ± 0.60 | 0.7987 | |
| 18 | 6.60 ± 1.70 | 21 | 6.93 ± 1.16 | 0.4765 | |
| 18 | 151.33± 42.63 | 21 | 157.43± 30.51 | 0.6070 | |
| 18 | 73.59 ± 13.32 | 21 | 79.49 ± 8.86 | 0.1073 | |
| 18 | 123.42 ± 3.80 | 21 | 120.82 ± 3.28 | ||
| 18 | 182.33 ± 8.11 | 21 | 184.76 ± 6.80 | 0.3154 | |
| 18 | 52.97 ± 3.09 | 21 | 53.00 ± 3.40 | 0.9754 | |
| 18 | 15.56 ± 0.69 | 21 | 15.84 ± 0.87 | 0.2667 | |
| 18 | 1089.72 ± 282.94 | 21 | 1203.14 ± 205.20 | 0.1563 | |
| 18 | 8.02 ± 0.46 | 21 | 8.29 ± 0.54 | 0.0986 | |
| 18 | 5.02 ± 0.83 | 21 | 4.97 ± 0.34 | 0.7810 | |
| 18 | 0.88 ± 0.26 | 21 | 1.00 ± 0.19 | 0.1021 | |
| 18 | 0.92 ± 0.17 | 21 | 0.99 ± 0.19 | 0.2461 | |
SD = Standard deviation values, n = sample size, t-test P-value
(*p<0.05)
Comparison of newborn Saiga antelope biochemical parameters with published data on the horses.
| Variables | Newborn Saiga antelope | Ergebinese dei | Light horse | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.91 ± 0.39 | NA | 2.44 ± 0.43 | 2.28 (2.18–2.36) | 2.25 ± 0.34 | |
| 7.75 ± 2.67 | 6.22 ± 1.17 | 8.27 ± 3.4 | NA | 4.55 ± 0.52 | |
| 8.13 ± 2.88 | 4.13 ± 2.75 | 5.92 ± 1.35 | 4.9–11.32 | NA | |
| 37.30 ± 10.18 | 69.0 ± 1.0 | 64.0 ± 6.0 | 71.0 (64–81) | 64.0 ± 5.0 | |
| 8.59 ± 7.90 | NA | 33.0 ± 3.0 | 36.0 (33–37) | NA | |
| 1.66 ± 0.12 | 3.0 ± 0.1 | 2.8 ± 0.23 | 2.38 (1.8–3.05) | 2.98 ± 0.13 | |
| 0.05 ± 0.07 | NA | NA | NA | 0.82 ± 0.04 |
NA = not available, n = sample size
Comparison of newborn Saiga antelope physiological parameters with published data on horses.
| Variables | Newborn Saiga antelope | Ergebinese dei | Light horse | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.46 ± 0.84 | 8.26 ± 1.68 | 8.3 ± 2.5 | 9.6 (8.4–10.8) | 7.45 ± 1.28 | |
| 18.59 ± 3.89 | 2.8 ± 0.81 | NA | NA | 3.10 ± 0.75 | |
| 151.33 ± 42.63 | 155 ± 1.7 | 154 ± 2.0 | 163 (14.3–20) | 146 ± 16.5 | |
| 73.59 ± 13.32 | 43.7 ± 3.7 | 0.42 ± 0.07 | 0.47(0.38–0.50) | 0.40 ± 0.04 | |
| 6.60 ± 1.70 | 8.9 ± 0.9 | NA | 8.6 (8.4–10.8) | 8.8 ± 0.95 |
NA = not available, n = number of sample size
Fig 1Comparison of closely related biochemical parameters.
Fig 3Comparison of closely related physiological parameters.
Fig 2Comparison of more closely related biochemical parameters.