Irais Estrada1, Caroline Balagot2, Marian Fierro1, Paula Kriner1, Esmeralda Iniguez-Stevens2, Anne Kjemtrup3, Janet Foley4. 1. Epidemiology, Imperial County Public Health Department, El Centro, CA, USA. 2. Office of Binational Border Health, California Department of Public Health, San Diego, CA, USA. 3. Vector-Borne Disease Section, Infectious Disease Branch, California Department of Public Health, Sacramento, CA, USA. 4. Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dogs are vulnerable to pathogens transmitted by brown dog ticks. An epidemic of Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF) is underway in Mexicali, a Mexican city bordering California affecting people and dogs; several human cases have been reported in California residents who travelled to Mexico. To evaluate risks of RMSF, we conducted seroprevalence surveys in Imperial County in 2016 and 2017 using dogs as sentinels. METHODS: Blood was collected from 752 dogs and was tested for antibodies against R. rickettsii, E. canis and A. phagocytophilum (as a proxy for A. platys). Samples were considered seropositive to spotted fever group rickettsia (SFGR) if the R. rickettsia titre was ≥1:64 and seropositive to E. canis and A. phagocytophilum if the titre was ≥1:32. Owners provided information on dog age, exposure risks, health status and tick prevention. We assessed associations between SFGR seropositivity and driving distance to the nearest US-Mexico border crossing station, whether proximity to a border crossing increased likelihood of taking dogs across the border, and whether distance to the border was associated with seropositivity. Logistic regression was performed to assess relationships between the titre classes and other predictor variables. RESULTS: 12.2% of dogs were seropositive against SFGR. Dogs close to the border were significantly more likely to be taken across the border and to be seropositive. Risk factors that increased seropositivity included owners seeing ticks on the dog (OR = 1.9), being an adult dog, travel to Mexico (OR = 3.0) and living in a rural area (OR = 4.0). There was statistically significant co-exposure to SFGR and Anaplasma spp. CONCLUSION: Surveillance for brown dog tick-vectored pathogens can help identify dogs and people at risk for RMSF. Tick prevention, particularly in dogs, and surveillance of tick-borne pathogens can help prevent the spread of rickettsioses and other diseases in this dynamic border region.
BACKGROUND:Dogs are vulnerable to pathogens transmitted by brown dog ticks. An epidemic of Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF) is underway in Mexicali, a Mexican city bordering California affecting people and dogs; several human cases have been reported in California residents who travelled to Mexico. To evaluate risks of RMSF, we conducted seroprevalence surveys in Imperial County in 2016 and 2017 using dogs as sentinels. METHODS: Blood was collected from 752 dogs and was tested for antibodies against R. rickettsii, E. canis and A. phagocytophilum (as a proxy for A. platys). Samples were considered seropositive to spotted fever group rickettsia (SFGR) if the R. rickettsia titre was ≥1:64 and seropositive to E. canis and A. phagocytophilum if the titre was ≥1:32. Owners provided information on dog age, exposure risks, health status and tick prevention. We assessed associations between SFGR seropositivity and driving distance to the nearest US-Mexico border crossing station, whether proximity to a border crossing increased likelihood of taking dogs across the border, and whether distance to the border was associated with seropositivity. Logistic regression was performed to assess relationships between the titre classes and other predictor variables. RESULTS: 12.2% of dogs were seropositive against SFGR. Dogs close to the border were significantly more likely to be taken across the border and to be seropositive. Risk factors that increased seropositivity included owners seeing ticks on the dog (OR = 1.9), being an adult dog, travel to Mexico (OR = 3.0) and living in a rural area (OR = 4.0). There was statistically significant co-exposure to SFGR and Anaplasma spp. CONCLUSION: Surveillance for brown dog tick-vectored pathogens can help identify dogs and people at risk for RMSF. Tick prevention, particularly in dogs, and surveillance of tick-borne pathogens can help prevent the spread of rickettsioses and other diseases in this dynamic border region.
Authors: Diana M Beristain-Ruiz; Javier A Garza-Hernández; Julio V Figueroa-Millán; José J Lira-Amaya; Andrés Quezada-Casasola; Susana Ordoñez-López; Stephanie Viridiana Laredo-Tiscareño; Beatriz Alvarado-Robles; Oliver R Castillo-Luna; Adriana Floriano-López; Luis M Hernández-Triana; Francisco Martínez-Ibáñez; Ramón Rivera-Barreno; Carlos A Rodríguez-Alarcón Journal: Pathogens Date: 2022-05-07
Authors: Andrés M López-Pérez; Libertad Orozco; Oscar E Zazueta; Maria Fierro; Paola Gomez; Janet Foley Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-05-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Anne M Kjemtrup; Kerry Padgett; Christopher D Paddock; Sharon Messenger; Jill K Hacker; Tina Feiszli; Michael Melgar; Marco E Metzger; Renjie Hu; Vicki L Kramer Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2022-09-15
Authors: James M Wilson; Edward B Breitschwerdt; Nicholas B Juhasz; Henry S Marr; Joao Felipe de Brito Galvão; Carmela L Pratt; Barbara A Qurollo Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 6.883