Rany M Bous1, Rebecca A Hazen2,3, Irene Baus4, J Martin Palomo5, Anand Kumar6,7, Manish Valiathan1. 1. Craniofacial, Surgical and Special Care Orthodontics Fellowship Program, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA. 2. Departments of Pediatrics and Psychology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine. 3. Division of Developmental/Behavioral Pediatrics and Psychology, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, University Hospital's Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA. 4. Cleft and Craniofacial Center, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, University Hospital's Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA. 5. Department of Orthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA. 6. Department of Pediatric Plastic Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA. 7. Department of Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have investigated psychosocial adjustments among adolescents with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P), but our understanding of other craniofacial conditions remains limited. The objective of this study is to compare psychosocial adjustments among 3 groups of adolescents: craniofacial conditions other than cleft lip and/or palate (craniofacial anomaly [CFA]), CL/P, and controls (CON). Our secondary objective is to examine how social factors may predict the adjustments levels. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, multi-informant, controlled survey study. PARTICIPANTS: Aged 11- to 17-year olds. Craniofacial anomaly (n = 49), isolated CL/P (n = 42), and 55 CON. Total = 146. OUTCOME MEASURES: The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (self-report, parent report, and teacher report). RESULTS: All 3 informant groups displayed similar patterns, where CFA reported the highest difficulties, followed by CL/P, while CON scored the lowest. Parent reports demonstrated significant differences among the 3 groups for most subscales and were emphasized for peer problems. Self-reports showed significant differences between CFA and CON for total scores and peer problems, while teacher reports showed significant differences for peer problems only. Craniofacial anomaly displayed the highest frequency of abnormal psychosocial adjustments, followed by CL/P. Experiencing bullying or teasing predicted increased difficulties, while having a good friend predicted decreased difficulties. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents with CFA, and to a lesser extent CL/P, may be at a higher risk of having psychosocial problems. Peer problems may constitute the biggest challenge that CFA and CL/P confront. Social factors, especially being bullied or having a good friend, may predict the psychosocial well-being of adolescents with craniofacial conditions.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have investigated psychosocial adjustments among adolescents with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P), but our understanding of other craniofacial conditions remains limited. The objective of this study is to compare psychosocial adjustments among 3 groups of adolescents: craniofacial conditions other than cleft lip and/or palate (craniofacial anomaly [CFA]), CL/P, and controls (CON). Our secondary objective is to examine how social factors may predict the adjustments levels. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, multi-informant, controlled survey study. PARTICIPANTS: Aged 11- to 17-year olds. Craniofacial anomaly (n = 49), isolated CL/P (n = 42), and 55 CON. Total = 146. OUTCOME MEASURES: The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (self-report, parent report, and teacher report). RESULTS: All 3 informant groups displayed similar patterns, where CFA reported the highest difficulties, followed by CL/P, while CON scored the lowest. Parent reports demonstrated significant differences among the 3 groups for most subscales and were emphasized for peer problems. Self-reports showed significant differences between CFA and CON for total scores and peer problems, while teacher reports showed significant differences for peer problems only. Craniofacial anomaly displayed the highest frequency of abnormal psychosocial adjustments, followed by CL/P. Experiencing bullying or teasing predicted increased difficulties, while having a good friend predicted decreased difficulties. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents with CFA, and to a lesser extent CL/P, may be at a higher risk of having psychosocial problems. Peer problems may constitute the biggest challenge that CFA and CL/P confront. Social factors, especially being bullied or having a good friend, may predict the psychosocial well-being of adolescents with craniofacial conditions.
Entities:
Keywords:
SDQ; cleft lip and palate; craniofacial conditions; psychosocial
Authors: Ryan K Badiee; Emma Popowitz; Ian T Mark; Andre Alcon; Joan Hwang; Eve Rorison; Kurtis I Auguste; William Y Hoffman; Peter P Sun; Jason H Pomerantz Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2022-02-09