Literature DB >> 3176924

Duration of labor. An analysis of influencing factors.

B I Nesheim1.   

Abstract

9703 labors at Akershus Central Hospital during the period January 1979 to January 1984 were analysed to see which factors influenced the duration of labor. Median duration was 8.2 h for nulliparas, 5.3 h for multiparas. Parity greater than one had no influence on duration. Induced labors were 1.9 h (nulliparas) and 1.4 h (multiparas) shorter than those with spontaneous onset. Stepwise linear regression showed that duration of labor was positively correlated with the weight of the infant, duration of pregnancy, weight gain and prepregnant weight. It was negatively correlated with mother's height. Mother's age did not influence duration of labor. Occiput posterior presentation and extensions of the head prolonged labor in nulliparas, but not in multiparas, while breech presentation had no influence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3176924     DOI: 10.3109/00016348809004182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  12 in total

1.  Continued risky behavior in HIV-infected youth.

Authors:  C Diamond; S Buskin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  A time to be born.

Authors:  M Anderka; E R Declercq; W Smith
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Sources of prenatal care data and their association with birth outcomes of HIV-infected women.

Authors:  B J Turner; J Cocroft; C J Newschaffer; W W Hauck; T R Fanning; M Berlin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Estimates of US children exposed to alcohol abuse and dependence in the family.

Authors:  B F Grant
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Factors predicting completion of a home visitation program by high-risk pregnant women: the North Carolina Maternal Outreach Worker Program.

Authors:  M Navaie-Waliser; S L Martin; M K Campbell; I Tessaro; M Kotelchuck; A W Cross
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  An analysis of the prediction of cephalopelvic disproportion.

Authors:  E Hanzal; C Kainz; G Hoffmann; J Deutinger
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.344

7.  Neonatal and delivery outcomes in women with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Mia L van der Kop; Mark S Pearce; Leanne Dahlgren; Anne Synnes; Dessa Sadovnick; Ana-Luiza Sayao; Helen Tremlett
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 10.422

8.  On predicting time to completion for the first stage of spontaneous labor at term in multiparous women.

Authors:  Björn Gunnarsson; Eirik Skogvoll; Ingibjörg Hanna Jónsdóttir; Jo Røislien; Alexander Kr Smárason
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Are freestanding midwifery units a safe alternative to obstetric units for low-risk, primiparous childbirth? An analysis of effect differences by parity in a matched cohort study.

Authors:  Louise Fischer Christensen; Charlotte Overgaard
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 10.  Diagnosing onset of labor: a systematic review of definitions in the research literature.

Authors:  Gillian E Hanley; Sarah Munro; Devon Greyson; Mechthild M Gross; Vanora Hundley; Helen Spiby; Patricia A Janssen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.