Literature DB >> 31769052

Prevalence of mosaicism in uncultured chorionic villus samples after chromosomal microarray and clinical outcome in pregnancies affected by confined placental mosaicism.

Ida C B Lund1,2,3, Naja Becher1,2,3, Rikke Christensen1,2,3, Olav B Petersen2,4,5, Ellen H Steffensen2, Else M Vestergaard1,2,3, Ida Vogel1,2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of mosaicism in chorionic villus sampling (CVS) samples after chromosomal microarray (CMA) and clinical outcome of pregnancies affected by confined placental mosaicism.
METHOD: We retrieved all results from CMA, array-based comparative genomic hybridization, on CVS samples from January 2011 to November 2017 from Central and North Denmark Regions. Mosaic results from uncultured chorionic villi, cytotrophoblasts and mesenchymal cells, after CVS and follow-up on amniocytes, fetal tissue, or postnatal blood were studied and matched with clinical data from The Danish Fetal Medicine Database.
RESULTS: Prevalence of mosaicism was 93 out of 2,288 (4.1%) CVS samples of which 17 (18.3%) concerned submicroscopic copy number variations (CNVs) <10 Mb. Follow-up analyses were performed in 62 cases. True fetal mosaicism (TFM) was confirmed in 18.4% (7/38) when mosaicism involved whole chromosome aneuploidy and in 25.0% (6/24), when involving a CNV (P = .59). Median birth weight z-score was higher in cases of confined placental mosaicism for a CNV (0.21) than cases involving whole chromosomes (-0.74) (P = .02).
CONCLUSION: Prevalence of mosaicism in CVS samples is higher after CMA on uncultured tissue than after conventional karyotyping on cultured tissue. The risk of TFM is equally high in cases of mosaicism for CNVs and whole chromosomes.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31769052     DOI: 10.1002/pd.5584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  6 in total

1.  [Genetic testing and analysis of 2 cases of trisomy 11 mosaicism].

Authors:  X Xie; Q Zhao; Y Fu; W Zhang; Y Meng; Y Lu
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2022-07-20

2.  Prenatal Diagnosis of Chromosomal Mosaicism in Over 18,000 Pregnancies: A Five-Year Single-Tertiary-Center Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Shuyuan Li; Yiru Shi; Xu Han; Yiyao Chen; Yinghua Shen; Wenjing Hu; Xinrong Zhao; Yanlin Wang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Confined placental mosaicism of trisomy 6 detected through genome-wide NIPT was associated with placental abruption.

Authors:  Miyuki Nishiyama; Seiji Wada; Fuyuki Hasegawa; Yohji Uehara; Mamoru Ozaki; Kenichiro Hata; Yushi Ito; Haruhiko Sago
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2021-12-05

4.  Application of the prenatal BACs-on-Beads™ assay for rapid prenatal detection of sex chromosome mosaicism.

Authors:  Min Zhang; LingJi Chen; Meihuan Chen; Yan Wang; Bin Liang; Na Lin; Xiaoqing Wu; Linshuo Wang; Liangpu Xu; Hailong Huang
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 5.  Aneuploidy and DNA Methylation as Mirrored Features of Early Human Embryo Development.

Authors:  Ekaterina N Tolmacheva; Stanislav A Vasilyev; Igor N Lebedev
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 4.096

6.  Chromosomal mosaicism detected by karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Mei Zhong; Dezhong Zheng
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 5.310

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.