Literature DB >> 31768504

Determining the Optimal Number of MEG Trials: A Machine Learning and Speech Decoding Perspective.

Debadatta Dash1, Paul Ferrari2,3, Saleem Malik4, Albert Montillo5,6, Joseph A Maldjian5, Jun Wang1,7.   

Abstract

Advancing the knowledge about neural speech mechanisms is critical for developing next-generation, faster brain computer interface to assist in speech communication for the patients with severe neurological conditions (e.g., locked-in syndrome). Among current neuroimaging techniques, Magnetoencephalography (MEG) provides direct representation for the large-scale neural dynamics of underlying cognitive processes based on its optimal spatiotemporal resolution. However, the MEG measured neural signals are smaller in magnitude compared to the background noise and hence, MEG usually suffers from a low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at the single-trial level. To overcome this limitation, it is common to record many trials of the same event-task and use the time-locked average signal for analysis, which can be very time consuming. In this study, we investigated the effect of the number of MEG recording trials required for speech decoding using a machine learning algorithm. We used a wavelet filter for generating the denoised neural features to train an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) for speech decoding. We found that wavelet based denoising increased the SNR of the neural signal prior to analysis and facilitated accurate speech decoding performance using as few as 40 single-trials. This study may open up the possibility of limiting MEG trials for other task evoked studies as well.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial Neural Network; MEG; Speech; Wavelets

Year:  2018        PMID: 31768504      PMCID: PMC6876632          DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-05587-5_16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Inform (2018)


  18 in total

1.  The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components.

Authors:  P Indefrey; W J M Levelt
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004 May-Jun

2.  Brain-computer-interface research: coming of age.

Authors:  Niels Birbaumer
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 3.  Cerebellar contributions to speech production and speech perception: psycholinguistic and neurobiological perspectives.

Authors:  Hermann Ackermann
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 13.837

4.  Demonstration of useful differences between magnetoencephalogram and electroencephalogram.

Authors:  D Cohen; B N Cuffin
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-07

5.  "Who" is saying "what"? Brain-based decoding of human voice and speech.

Authors:  Elia Formisano; Federico De Martino; Milene Bonte; Rainer Goebel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Brainstorm: a user-friendly application for MEG/EEG analysis.

Authors:  François Tadel; Sylvain Baillet; John C Mosher; Dimitrios Pantazis; Richard M Leahy
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-13

Review 7.  Automatic Speech Recognition from Neural Signals: A Focused Review.

Authors:  Christian Herff; Tanja Schultz
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  MEG studies of motor cortex gamma oscillations: evidence for a gamma "fingerprint" in the brain?

Authors:  Douglas Cheyne; Paul Ferrari
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research.

Authors:  Joachim Gross; Sylvain Baillet; Gareth R Barnes; Richard N Henson; Arjan Hillebrand; Ole Jensen; Karim Jerbi; Vladimir Litvak; Burkhard Maess; Robert Oostenveld; Lauri Parkkonen; Jason R Taylor; Virginie van Wassenhove; Michael Wibral; Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Decoding of Covert Vowel Articulation Using Electroencephalography Cortical Currents.

Authors:  Natsue Yoshimura; Atsushi Nishimoto; Abdelkader Nasreddine Belkacem; Duk Shin; Hiroyuki Kambara; Takashi Hanakawa; Yasuharu Koike
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  2 in total

1.  Decoding Imagined and Spoken Phrases From Non-invasive Neural (MEG) Signals.

Authors:  Debadatta Dash; Paul Ferrari; Jun Wang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 4.677

2.  NeuroVAD: Real-Time Voice Activity Detection from Non-Invasive Neuromagnetic Signals.

Authors:  Debadatta Dash; Paul Ferrari; Satwik Dutta; Jun Wang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 3.576

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.