| Literature DB >> 31768455 |
Yutaka Nakamura1, Yutaka Machida2, Hiroki Hanawa3, Masayoshi Kanai1, Satoshi Asano1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to determine impacts on walking ability of spinal deformity and imbalance as distinct from movement disorders in Parkinson's disease (PD).Entities:
Keywords: Parkinson's Disease; osteoporosis; spinal deformity; walking ability
Year: 2019 PMID: 31768455 PMCID: PMC6834471 DOI: 10.22603/ssrr.2018-0046
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Spine Surg Relat Res ISSN: 2432-261X
Demographic Data of the 32 PD Patients and Evaluation of Their Radiographic Spinal Parameters.
| Age, mean (range), 72.5 (56−85) yr |
| Gender, M: 15, F: 17 |
| UPDRS, mean (SD), 36.6 (24.4) |
| Hoehn and Yahr staging scale, stage 1, 3; stage 2, 13; stage 3, 11; stage 4, 5 |
| L-dopa equal amount, mean (SD), 546 (189) mg |
| PD duration, mean, 8.3 (1-31) yr |
| Cobb angel (SD) of 15 cases, 20.0 (6.7) |
| Thoracic kyphosis (SD), 42.3 (18.8)° |
| Thoracolumbar kyohosis (SD), 14.8 (15.8)° |
| Lumbar lordosis (SD), 26.7 (21.7)° |
| Pelvic tilt (SD), 20.8 (10.0)° |
| Pelvic incidence (SD), 48.8 (11.3)° |
| Sagittal vertical axis (SD), 66.4 (60.6) mm |
| Timed Up and Go test (SD), 13.8 (8.2) seconds |
| Lumbar BMD (SD), 0.856 (0.167) g/cm2 |
| Femur BMD (SD), 0.585 (0.102) g/cm2 |
PD: Parkinson’s disease; UPDRS; Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale; BMD; bone mineral density
Statistically Significant Variables in the Multiple Logistic Regression Model (n=32, R=0.834456, Adjusted R2=0.67081).
| β | P Value | 95%CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| UPDRS part III | 0.26199 | 0.0001 | 0.19-0.33 |
| LL (lumbar lordosis) | −0.12083 | 0.0077 | −0.204- −0.04 |
| BMD (Femoral neck) | 19.7871 | 0.0273 | 2.82-39.75 |
| PI (pelvic incidence) | 0.15763 | 0.0582 | −0.001-0.3 |
R: multiple correlation coefficient; R2: coefficient of determination; β: standard partial regression coefficient; CI: confidence interval; UPDRS: Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale; BMD: bone mineral density
Figure 1.Case 1 (a) Whole spine X-P, anteroposterior view. (b) Whole spine X-P, lateral view.
Figure 2.Case 2 (a) Whole spine X-P, anteroposterior view before surgery. (b) Whole spine X-P, lateral view before surgery. (c) lumbar X-P, lateral view before surgery (d) lumbar MRI before surgery. (e) Whole spine X-P, anteroposterior view after surgery. (f) Whole spine X-P, lateral view after surgery.