| Literature DB >> 31767830 |
Marta Cuadros1,2,3, Álvaro Andrades2,4, Isabel F Coira2,4, Carlos Baliñas2,4, María I Rodríguez2,3,4, Juan Carlos Álvarez-Pérez2,3,4, Paola Peinado2,4, Alberto M Arenas2,4, Daniel J García1,2, Pilar Jiménez3,5, Mireia Camós6, Antonio Jiménez-Velasco7, Pedro P Medina8,9,10.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31767830 PMCID: PMC6877621 DOI: 10.1038/s41408-019-0258-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Blood Cancer J ISSN: 2044-5385 Impact factor: 11.037
Fig. 1Differential expression of lncRNAs in ETV6-RUNX1-positive pediatric B-ALL vs. ETV6-RUNX1-negative pediatric B-ALL.
a Heatmap of differentially expressed lncRNAs. On top of the heatmap, ETV6-RUNX1-negative B-ALL samples are labeled in blue and ETV6-RUNX1-positive B-ALL samples are labeled in red. Clustering was performed based on the Spearman correlation coefficient. Our candidate lncRNA, TCL6, is highlighted in bold. b Volcano plot of the differential expression results. The horizontal dashed line represents a threshold of FDR = 0.05. The vertical dashed line represents the thresholds of fold change = −1.5 and fold change = 1.5. Red dots represent the statistically significant differentially expressed lncRNAs. Our candidate lncRNA, TCL6, is highlighted in bold. c Correlation of the expression of lncRNA/mRNA pairs in pediatric B-ALL datasets. We focused our analysis on the unique lncRNA/mRNA pairs that were differentially expressed in our microarray data. For each pair, the Spearman correlation coefficient between the normalized expression of the lncRNA and the normalized expression of the associated mRNA was assessed in our data, as well as in external datasets of B-ALL patients and cell lines. Larger dots represent lower FDR-adjusted p-values. Our candidate lncRNA/mRNA pair, TCL6/TCL1B, is highlighted in bold. The sample sizes were: n = 46 for our data, n = 80 for Lee et al.[8], n = 64 for Ghazavi et al.[5] and n = 44 for Fernando et al.[6]. In addition, we analyzed data from 13 B-ALL cell lines from the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE). Missing values are represented with an “NA” mark.
Fig. 2Validation of the relevance of TCL6/TCL1B in pediatric B-ALL.
a Correlation analysis of TCL6/TCL1B in independent datasets of pediatric B-ALL patients. The points are colored according to the genomic aberration of the samples. The p-values were adjusted using the Benjamini–Hochberg method. Sample sizes: n = 46 for our data, n = 80 for Lee et al.[8], n = 64 for Ghazavi et al.[5], n = 44 for Fernando et al (2015). b. Correlation analysis of TCL6/TCL1B in the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE), n = 13. The points are colored according to the genomic aberration of the samples. c. Validation of the differential expression of TCL6 and TCL1B in three independent external B-ALL cohorts. Sample sizes: n = 46 for our data, n = 80 for Lee et al (2015), n = 64 for Ghazavi et al (2016) and n = 44 for Fernando et al.[6]. Kruskal–Wallis FDR-adjusted p-values are shown. d Kaplan–Meier curve of pediatric B-ALL patients divided in two groups: “TCL6 high” and “TCL6 low”, based on whether TCL6 expression was above or beyond the median. The logrank p-value is shown.