| Literature DB >> 31767748 |
Amitesh Anand1, Ke Chen1, Laurence Yang1, Anand V Sastry1, Connor A Olson1, Saugat Poudel1, Yara Seif1, Ying Hefner1, Patrick V Phaneuf2, Sibei Xu1, Richard Szubin1, Adam M Feist1,3, Bernhard O Palsson4,2,3.
Abstract
Evolution fine-tunes biological pathways to achieve a robust cellular physiology. Two and a half billion years ago, rapidly rising levels of oxygen as a byproduct of blooming cyanobacterial photosynthesis resulted in a redox upshift in microbial energetics. The appearance of higher-redox-potential respiratory quinone, ubiquinone (UQ), is believed to be an adaptive response to this environmental transition. However, the majority of bacterial species are still dependent on the ancient respiratory quinone, naphthoquinone (NQ). Gammaproteobacteria can biosynthesize both of these respiratory quinones, where UQ has been associated with aerobic lifestyle and NQ with anaerobic lifestyle. We engineered an obligate NQ-dependent γ-proteobacterium, Escherichia coli ΔubiC, and performed adaptive laboratory evolution to understand the selection against the use of NQ in an oxic environment and also the adaptation required to support the NQ-driven aerobic electron transport chain. A comparative systems-level analysis of pre- and postevolved NQ-dependent strains revealed a clear shift from fermentative to oxidative metabolism enabled by higher periplasmic superoxide defense. This metabolic shift was driven by the concerted activity of 3 transcriptional regulators (PdhR, RpoS, and Fur). Analysis of these findings using a genome-scale model suggested that resource allocation to reactive oxygen species (ROS) mitigation results in lower growth rates. These results provide a direct elucidation of a resource allocation tradeoff between growth rate and ROS mitigation costs associated with NQ usage under oxygen-replete condition.Entities:
Keywords: genome-scale model; naphthoquinone; oxidative stress; respiration
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31767748 PMCID: PMC6911176 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1909987116
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205
Fig. 1.Experimental evolution of E. coli ΔubiC strain. (A) The schematic for generation of strains used in the study. (B) The growth rate evolution trajectories (smoothed data) and the convergent mutations (Inset) observed in ΔubiC replicates during laboratory evolution. shows the extended axis plot of these trajectories. (C) List of genes mutated during the evolution of the ΔubiC replicates. (D) Activity of the pyruvate i-modulon estimated by independent component analysis (ICA). ΔpdhR has been used as the control strain. The bars with identical colors represent biological replicates of the corresponding strain.
Exchange rates of wild-type, ΔubiC, and evolved ΔubiC E. coli K12 MG1655 strains
| Strain | Oxygen uptake rate | Glucose uptake rate | Acetate secretion rate | Lactate secretion rate |
| WT | 14.27 ± 1.01 | 11.23 ± 0.55 | 7.83 ± 0.61 | ND |
| ∆ | 7.41 ± 0.72 | 9.06 ± 0.24 | 6.45 ± 0.13 | 3.41 ± 0.80 |
| ALE-1 | 12.16 ± 0.62 | 9.40 ± 0.36 | 7.38 ± 0.20 | 0.34 ± 0.05 |
| ALE-2 | 11.78 ± 0.38 | 8.86 ± 0.40 | 6.74 ± 0.25 | 0.66 ± 0.19 |
| ALE-3 | 12.17 ± 0.46 | 8.38 ± 0.07 | 6.32 ± 0.08 | 0.70 ± 0.02 |
The unit of metabolite uptake/secretion rate is mmol/gDCW/h. gDCW, gram dry cell weight; ND, not detected.
Fig. 2.Evolutionary optimization of the respiratory system. (A) Heatmap showing the expression changes of enzymes involved in ETS and pyruvate metabolism. Fold-changes have been calculated with respect to the wild-type strain. (B) Computed metabolic flux maps depict the differences in central metabolism between the WT, the preevolved, and evolved strains (ALE-1, 2, and 3). Major pathways represented in the figure include glycolysis (metabolites colored in green), oxidative pentose phosphate pathway (oxPPP, yellow), the TCA cycle (black), and the pyruvate pathway (blue). Key metabolites are indicated in the figure as follows: glc, glucose; g6p, d-glucose-6-phosphate; g3p, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate; f6p, d-fructose-6-phosphate; pyr, pyruvate; 6pgc, 6-phospho-d-gluconate; pep, phosphoenolpyruvate; lac, lactate; for, formate. Calculated fluxes of each strain are colored on a log scale.
Fig. 3.Oxidative stress mitigation. (A) Expression changes in ROS-quenching enzymes. Fold-changes have been calculated with respect to the wild-type strain [periplasmic superoxide dismutase, sodC; cytosolic superoxide dismutase, sodB and sodA; bifunctional hydroperoxidase, katG; monofunctional catalase, katE; alkyl hydroperoxide reductase, ahpC and ahpF; NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase, wrbA]. (B) Estimation of the growth retardation caused due to addition of peroxide (1 mM H2O2) and superoxide (1 µM paraquat) generating chemicals by calculating the relative increase in the lag phase. For each strain, the mean of the estimated lag phase across untreated replicates (control) was calculated. The lag-phase estimates of the conditions with treatment was then divided by the corresponding control condition (yielding the relative lag phase). The error bars represent the SD for the lag estimates across replicates (n ≥ 3). The effect of adaptive evolution was significant in the paraquat treatment (P value < 0.001) but not in peroxide treatment (P value = 0.13) (). (C) Adaptive changes in the activity of Fur i-modulon in the evolved strains. Iron-starved, iron-replete, and paraquat-treated WT conditions serve as controls. The bars with identical colors represent biological replicates of the corresponding strain. (D) Genome-scale model-based calculation of the impact of periplasmic nonproductive electron leak on the growth rate of E. coli. shows the extended axis plot of these calculations.