Literature DB >> 31767388

Comparison of the sensitivity of laryngeal swabs and deep tracheal catheters for detection of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae in experimentally and naturally infected pigs early and late after infection.

Amanda Sponheim1, Julio Alvarez2, Eduardo Fano3, Ethan Schmaling3, Scott Dee4, Dan Hanson4, Thomas Wetzell3, Maria Pieters5.   

Abstract

Detection of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infection in live pigs is a critical component to measure the success of disease control or elimination strategies. However, in vivo diagnosis of M. hyopneumoniae is difficult and the imperfect sensitivity of diagnostic tools has been deemed as one of the main challenges. Here, the sensitivity of laryngeal swabs and deep tracheal catheters for detection of M. hyopneumoniae early and late after infection was determined using inoculation status as a gold standard in experimentally infected pigs and a Bayesian approach in naturally infected pigs. Three-hundred and twenty 8-week old seeder pigs were intra-tracheally inoculated with M. hyopneumoniae strain 232 and immediately placed with 1920 contact pigs to achieve a 1:6 seeder-to-contact ratio. A subset of seeders and contacts were longitudinally sampled at 7, 28, 97, and 113 days post-inoculation (dpi) and at 28, 56, 84, and 113 days post-exposure (dpe), respectively, using laryngeal swabs and deep tracheal catheters. Samples were tested for M. hyopneumoniae by a species-specific real-time PCR. The sensitivity of deep tracheal catheters was higher than the one obtained in laryngeal swabs at all samplings (seeders: 36% higher than laryngeal swabs at 7 dpi, 29% higher at 97 dpi, and 44% higher at 113 dpi; contacts: 51% higher at 56 dpe, 42% higher at 84 dpe, and 32% higher at 113 dpe). Our study indicates that deep tracheal catheters were a more sensitive sample than laryngeal swabs. The sensitivity of both sample types varied over time and by exposure method, and these factors should be considered when designing diagnostic strategies.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian modeling; Deep tracheal catheter; In vivo; Laryngeal swab; Sensitivity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31767388     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2019.108500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Microbiol        ISSN: 0378-1135            Impact factor:   3.293


  9 in total

Review 1.  Mycoplasmas as Host Pantropic and Specific Pathogens: Clinical Implications, Gene Transfer, Virulence Factors, and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Ali Dawood; Samah Attia Algharib; Gang Zhao; Tingting Zhu; Mingpu Qi; Kong Delai; Zhiyu Hao; Marawan A Marawan; Ihsanullah Shirani; Aizhen Guo
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 6.073

2.  The role of co-infections in M. hyopneumoniae outbreaks among heavy fattening pigs: a field study.

Authors:  Matteo Tonni; Nicoletta Formenti; M Beatrice Boniotti; Flavia Guarneri; Federico Scali; Claudia Romeo; Paolo Pasquali; Maria Pieters; Dominiek Maes; Giovanni L Alborali
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.829

3.  Influence of parity and reproductive stage on the prevalence of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae in breeding animals in belgian farrow-to-finish pig herds.

Authors:  Evelien Biebaut; Ilias Chantziaras; Filip Boyen; Bert Devriendt; Freddy Haesebrouck; Charles-Oliver Gomez-Duran; Dominiek Maes
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2022-06-09

4.  Transfer of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae-specific cell mediated immunity to neonatal piglets.

Authors:  Bert Devriendt; Dominiek Maes; Evelien Biebaut; Lisa Beuckelaere; Filip Boyen; Freddy Haesebrouck; Charles-Oliver Gomez-Duran
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 3.683

5.  Development of an indirect ELISA for detection of anti-Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae IgG in naturally infected pathogen-induced convalescent sera.

Authors:  Yaqin Tian; Zuobo Xu; Yukang Wen; Mei Yang; Yaru Ning; Zhaodi Wang; Honglei Ding
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae Surveillance in Pig Populations: Establishing Sampling Guidelines for Detection in Growing Pigs.

Authors:  Maria Jose Clavijo; Dapeng Hu; Seth Krantz; Jean Paul Cano; Thairê Pereira Maróstica; Alexandra Henao-Diaz; Ana Paula S Poeta Silva; Deanne Hemker; Edgar Tapia; Silvia Zimmerman; Eduardo Fano; Dale Polson; Robert Fitzgerald; Alexander Tucker; Rodger Main; Chong Wang; Jeffrey J Zimmerman; Marisa L Rotolo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Cough associated with the detection of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae DNA in clinical and environmental specimens under controlled conditions.

Authors:  Ana Paula S Poeta Silva; Gabriel Y Storino; Franco S Matias Ferreyra; Min Zhang; Eduardo Fano; Dale Polson; Chong Wang; Rachel J Derscheid; Jeffrey J Zimmerman; Maria J Clavijo; Bailey L Arruda
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2022-01-25

8.  Dynamics and chronology of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae strain 232 infection in experimentally inoculated swine.

Authors:  Henrique M S Almeida; Marina L Mechler-Dreibi; Karina Sonálio; Marcela M Ferreira; Paulo E B Martinelli; Igor R H Gatto; Dominiek Maes; Hélio J Montassier; Luís G Oliveira
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2021-06-30

9.  Performance of Commercial Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae Serum Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays under Experimental and Field Conditions.

Authors:  Ana Paula S Poeta Silva; Ronaldo L Magtoto; Henrique M Souza Almeida; Aric McDaniel; Precy D Magtoto; Rachel J Derscheid; Maria M Merodio; Franco S Matias Ferreyra; Igor R H Gatto; David H Baum; Maria J Clavijo; Bailey L Arruda; Jeffrey J Zimmerman; Luis G Giménez-Lirola
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 5.948

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.