| Literature DB >> 31767343 |
Elan D Louis1, Martin Bares2, Julian Benito-Leon3, Stanley Fahn4, Steven J Frucht5, Joseph Jankovic6, William G Ondo7, Pramod K Pal8, Eng-King Tan9.
Abstract
In addition to redefining essential tremor (ET), the 2018 consensus statement of the Movement Disorder Society on tremor coined a new term: essential tremor-plus (ET-plus). This term is uncertainly defined as tremor with the characteristics of ET, with additional neurological signs of uncertain clinical significance. If ET-plus had been defined on the basis of a difference in underlying pathology or an appreciable difference in prognosis, it would have a valid, scientific rationale, as does the term Parkinson-plus. However, there is no such evidence, so the basis for the term is questionable. In fact, ET-plus might only represent a state condition (ie, patients with ET might develop these additional clinical features when the disease is at a more advanced stage). We caution against coining new terms that are not supported by a firm scientific basis and encourage research into the creation of essential tremor subsets that are defined with respect to differences in underlying causes or pathophysiology.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31767343 DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30398-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lancet Neurol ISSN: 1474-4422 Impact factor: 44.182