| Literature DB >> 31767033 |
Jan P M Langeveld1, Laura Pirisinu2, Jorg G Jacobs3, Maria Mazza4, Isabelle Lantier5, Stéphanie Simon6, Olivier Andréoletti7, Cristina Acin8, Elena Esposito2, Christine Fast9, Martin Groschup9, Wilfred Goldmann10, John Spiropoulos11, Theodoros Sklaviadis12, Frederic Lantier5, Loukia Ekateriniadou13, Penelope Papasavva-Stylianou14, Lucien J M van Keulen3, Pier-Luigi Acutis4, Umberto Agrimi2, Alex Bossers3, Romolo Nonno2.
Abstract
Scrapie in goats has been known since 1942, the archetype ofEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31767033 PMCID: PMC6878695 DOI: 10.1186/s13567-019-0718-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Res ISSN: 0928-4249 Impact factor: 3.683
Goat sample codes and details and final outcome of the TSE typing study
| Study code | Country | Identity # | Breed [region]a | Age (year)a | Genotypeb | Molecular TSE-type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STUDY CASES | ||||||
| I2 | IT | 114921/1/1 | Camosciata [Piedmond] | 10 | 240PP | CS-2 |
| I3 | 121429/1/1 | Meticcia [Sicily] | 5 | 240PP | CS-2 | |
| I4 | 128710/1/1 | Saanen [Lombardy] | 3 | 211QR, 240PS | CS-2 | |
| I5 | 17646/1/1 | Meticcia [Sicily] | 5 | 240PP | CS-2 | |
| I7 | 85788/1/1 | Meticcia [Sicily] | > 1.5 | 240PP | CS-2 | |
| I9 | 85792/1/1 | Meticcia [Sicily] | 6 | 143HR, 240PS | CS-2 | |
| I11 | 117463/1/1 | Meticcia [Emilia-Romagna] | 9 | 240PS | CS-2 | |
| I12 | 144508/1/1 | Alpina [Apulia] | 5 | 240PS | CS-2 | |
| I15 | 87016/1/1 | Meticcia [Campania] | 6 | 154RH, 240PS | AS | |
| N1 | NL | 577277 | Dwarf goat [Limburg] | 2–3 | 143HR, 240PS | CS-1 |
| N2 | 586632-32 | Dwarf goat [Limburg] | ? | 240PP | CS-1 | |
| N3 | 586632-33 | Dwarf goat [Limburg] | ? | 143HR, 240PS | CS-1 | |
| F2* | FR | CP40 | Saanen [INRA] | 4 | 240PS | CS-1 |
| F3 | CDP1028 | Saanen [Poitou] | 5 | 240PP | CS-1 | |
| F6 | CP2119 | Saanen [Charentes] | 3–4 | 240PS | CS-1 | |
| F10 | CP/2143 | Alpine [Limousin] | 3–4 | 240PS | CS-1 | |
| F11* | CP2154 | Saanen [Poitou] | 4 | 142IM, 240PP | CS-1 | |
| F14 | CP9041 | Alpine [Poitou] | 6 | 142IM, 240PS | CS-1c | |
| F16 | CP9135 | Alpine [Indre] | 6 | 240PS | CS-2 | |
| ic-gtBSE1* | CH1075 | Saanen [INRA] | ? | 211RQ, 240PS | BSE | |
| S2 | SP | C-163P | Alpine [Asturia] | 6 | 240PS | CS-1 |
| S3 | C-645P | Crossbreed [Aragon] | 4 | 240PP | CS-1 | |
| G2 | GR | 1663 | ? | 240PP | CS-1c | |
| G3 | 1676 | 4 | 143HR, 240PP | CS-1 | ||
| G11 | GR005 | 6 | 211RQ, 222QK | CS-1 | ||
| G12 | GR177 | 4 | 222QK | <c | ||
| G13 | GR018 | 5 | wt | CS-1 | ||
| G14 | GR055 | 4 | wt | CS-1 | ||
| G15 | GR195 | 2.5 | 222QK | NEG | ||
| G16 | GR091 | 2 | wt | CS-1 | ||
| G17 | GR247 | 4.6 | 222QK | NEG | ||
| C1 | CYP | Zyp13 | Damascus [Nicosia] | 4 | 240PP | CS-1 |
| C2 | Zyp21 | Damascus [Nicosia] | 5 | 240PP | CS-1 | |
| C3 | Zyp27 | Damascus [Nicosia] | 3 | wt, 240PP | CS-1 | |
| UK-A2 | UK | G08-1475 | Anglo-NubianxSaanen [?] | 4 | 127GS, 240PP | CS-1 |
| UK-B2 | G08-1469 | Anglo-NubianxSaanen [?] | 8 | 127GS, 240PP | CS-CH1641 | |
| UK-C2 | G08-1460 | Anglo-NubianxSaanen [?] | 9 | 127GS, 240PP | CS-1 | |
| UK-D2 | G08-1446 | Anglo-NubianxSaanen [?] | 7 | 211RQ, 240PP | <c | |
Study codes will be used in the text reflecting the country of origin, I for Italy, N Netherlands, F France, S Spain, G Greece, C Cyprus, UK United Kingdom. From single holdings were only the cases from Netherlands, UK and Greek cases G13 and G16. Symbols: *, obtained after experimental infections (see “Materials and methods”). The specific tests performed on the samples, the PrPres content of the sample (when analysed in Triplex-WB) are presented in Additional file 2.
aINRA, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique. ? = region of origin or age not disclosed or not known.
bGenotype as defined by specific polymorphic codon positions in the goat PRNP gene. Wild type (wt) is defined as follows: 127GG, 142II, 143RR, 154RR, 211RR, 222QQ, 240SS. Unless wt genotype, only the codon positions that differ from homogenous wild type are shown.
cSamples F14 and G2: probably CS-1. F14 too weak for Triplex-WB and ISS-PK methods, G2 too little amount for distribution. G12 and UK-D2: late samples, only analysed by Triplex-WB, too weak signal for analysis.
Figure 1Discriminatory test results for exclusion of BSE in goat samples. Values below red broken lines indicate that sample concerned is considered BSE suspect. A CEA-ELISA. Values are normalised to sample ic-gtBSE2. B, C ISS-WB results (see Additional file 3). In B are shown N-terminus values relative to the PrPres core as reflected in the P4/SAF84 ratios normalised to the ratio of sample I11. In C is shown the difference in molecular mass in kDa of the N-band between that in a sample and the reference sample (I11). AVG gtSCR and AVG gtBSE represent average and SD of respectively the classical scrapie field samples (except I15 and UKB2) and of all gtBSE samples. Ratios in A and B are inverted compared to original methodology for the logical reason that the bar heights correlate positivley with N terminus values of PrPres.
Figure 2Triplex-WB of goat study samples from different geographical regions together with TSE controls. Three antibodies used are indicated left. Images are all taken from the same blotting membrane. Lanes P and M, respectively recombinant shPrP and molecular mass standards. Position of molecular mass standards are visible only in the 647 nm (12B2) image and are indicated with kDa figures. Sample identities as in Tables 1 and Additional files 1 and 2 are indicated above the lanes. Only the CH1641 controls and UK-B2 sample exhibit a unique glycoprofile difference between SAF84 and Sha31. In lane C-gtCH1641, the positions of the three bands in triplets PrPres#1 (black, D1, M1, N1) and PrPres#2 (blue, D2, M2, N2) are indicated in the SAF84 panel at the right, including their approximate molecular masses; M1 and D2 have nearly similar molecular masses. Therefore, the signal of SAF84 in the D2 + M1 area is clearly higher than in the D1 area because this co-migration reflects the sum of D2 and M1 with that antibody, while with antibodies having more N-terminus located epitope specificity than SAF84 such as Sha31 the D1-area is higher than the D2 + M1 region.” Tissue equivalents applied vary between 0.5 and 2 mg. Samples were analysed in triplicate WB experiments.
Figure 3Dot plots of data obtained from Triplex-WB of PrP as in Figure . Each dot represents an individual goat TSE sample analysed in triplicate. Symbols: circles represent field cases and colour the country of origin; other symbols represent experimental samples and control samples from sheep or goat. A Plot with marker for N terminus epitope level on vertical axis versus PrPres double triplets marker on horizontal axis. Horizontal and vertical broken lines indicate the clear separation between CS, CH1641 and BSE. The lower N-terminus marker values of Italian cases and F16 are striking (encircled). B Triplet glycoprofile markers with non-glycosylated (N) fraction on vertical axis and on horizontal axis the ratio between signals in mono-glycosylated (M) and di-glycosylated fraction (D). A difference is obvious between BSE cases (low N and low M/D, due to high D levels in BSE samples) with CS and CH1641 cases.
Figure 4Proteinase-K (PK) sensitivity of the - (P4) PrP epitope in goat classical scrapie (CS) samples. A, B PK digestion curves of respective scrapie goat isolates S2 and I5, showing the differential sensitivities to PK of the epitopes of respectively SAF84 (black) and P4 (red). Vertical lines point to the 1 mg mL−1 PK condition used to study a larger selection of CS cases in C. C Shows the sensitivity of samples to PK at 1 mg mL−1 of the N terminal PrPres P4-epitope relative to that of core epitope SAF84. Vertical dashed line separates the samples between the ones with highest (CS-1) and lowest (CS-2) P4 epitope content consistent with data in Additional file 4. The cut-off between the two groups is reflected by the horizontal dash line and is based on the value of the reference sample I11 plus the average value of the standard deviations of all samples (1 + 0.4 = 1.4).
Figure 5Stability of PrP core region after denaturing and basic pretreatment of goat study samples. A The effect of 3.5 M Gdn-HCl treatment on susceptibility to proteolytic degradation was compared to normal condition when analysed by ISS-WB with mAb SAF84. The denaturation yielded high core epitope losses in the CS and CH1641 samples, but not in BSE samples where the PrPres core apparently is highly stable (horizontal axis). The vertical axis shows the susceptibility of the PrPres N-terminus under normal conditions of the ISS-WB process. B The effect of basic pH8 pre-treatment on subsequent proteolytic degradation. Only samples from four countries were tested. The BSE samples appeared the most resistant against proteolytic degradation of the PrPres core. All field samples from Italy, Netherlands, France and Spain together and separately from each country did exhibit a significantly higher susceptibility to Gdn denaturation than goatBSE, as indicated with the P values (Bonferroni–Dunn method).
PrP parameters that differentiate TSE-types in goats
| PrPres parameter | CS-1 | CS-2 | CS-CH1641 | BSE | AS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glycoprofilea | |||||
| M%/D% ratio, Sha31 | High (> 0.3) | High (> 0.3) | High (> 0.3) | Low (< 0.2) | NA |
| N%, Sha31 | High (> 8%) | High (> 8%) | High (> 8%) | Low (< 8%) | NA |
| N-terminus levelb | |||||
| Normal PK: 12B2/Sha31 ratio | High (0.8–1.3) | Low (< 0.2) | Low (< 0.2) | NA | |
| High PK: P4/SAF84 ratio | High (1.4-4) | ND | ND | NA | |
| High PK: A’/A ratio, SAF34 + Bar224 | High (> 0.3) | High (> 0.3) | ND | Low (0.8–1.3) | minute (≪ 0.8) |
| kDa (N-band)c | |||||
| Triplex-WB, Sha31 | 19.9–21.6 | 18.5–19.5e | 18.5–19.5 | NA | |
| ISS-WB, SAF84 | 17.5 | 17.5 | 16–17 | 16–17 | 8 |
| Triplet profile, SAF84/Sha31 ratio at 22– 24 kDa | Single | Single | Double | Single | Absent |
| Core stability: SAF84 and L42 | Low | Low | Low | High | NA |
| PrP C-terminus ~ 154–234d | Present | Present | Present | Present | Absent |
Nine parameters of PrPSc obtained after differential PK digestion of TSE infected goat brain and WB. Epitope location determines the outcome. The italic texts indicate differences between CS-1 and CS-2. Between parentheses are the ranges in quantitative values as obtained in Triplex-WB (Sha31 related), ISS-WB (SAF84 related) or ELISA (SAF34 + Bar224 related). The ranges are relative to the different categories, not absolute, and should be compared per experiment with proper controls (BSE, CS-1, CS-2, CS-CH1641). ND: analysis not done, NA: not applicable due to absence of a classical PrPres triplet. These typing tests may well work also on sheep TSE samples
aGlycoprofile estimated by ISS-WB with SAF84 did show similar discriminatory properties as with Sha31 for C-1, CS-2, and CH1641 M/D values > 0.4 and BSE < 0.4, and N percentages for CS > 13% and BSE < 13%
bResult with 12B2/Sha31 from Triplex-WB, P4/SAF84 from ISS-WB and SAF34 + Bar224 from CEA ELISA
cThese two rows represent the same differentiating parameter. Differences between ISS-WB and Triplex-WB in molecular mass values are due to use of different gel systems and molecular mass standards
dAbsence of PrP region ~ 154–234 is based on presence of Sha31 epitope and absence of SAF84 epitope corroborating interpretations by Pirisinu et al. [45]
eThe molecular mass of the N-fraction of PrPres#1 triplet is estimated to be 18.5 kDa, and that of the PrPres#2 triplet 10 kDa (see Figure 2).