| Literature DB >> 31767021 |
Silvia Lai1, Sandro Mazzaferro2, Anna Paola Mitterhofer2, Enea Bonci3, Paolo Giangreco Marotta2, Francesco Pelligra2, Manuel Murciano4, Camilla Celani5, Patrizia Troiani4, Giuseppe Cimino4, Paolo Palange4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is one of the most frequent genetic diseases and the median survival of these patients has improved in the last few decades, therefore it becomes necessary to evaluate the long-term complications as renal and cardiovascular risk factors. AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the incidence, the manifestations of renal disease and the possible association with metabolic and endothelial dysfunction markers in the CF population.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiovascular disease; Chronic kidney disease; Cystic fibrosis; Endothelial dysfunction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31767021 PMCID: PMC6878680 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-019-02139-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Patients’ characteristics
| Age (years) | eGFR mL/min/1.73 m2 | FEV1 | Creatinine mg/dL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Males N = 126 | 34.8 ± 11.7 | 107.0 ± 28.5 | 71.6 ± 28.9 | 0.87 ± 0.21 |
| Females N = 100 | 35.2 ± 11.7 | 104.1 ± 32.1 | 71.2 ± 24.9 | 0.71 ± 0.19 |
| Total N = 226 | 34.92 ± 11.67 | 105.76 ± 30.08 | 71.41 ± 27.11 | 0.80 ± 0.22 |
| p value (using t test) | 0.909 | 0.477 | 0.923 | 0.001 |
Comparison of the mean age, eGFR, FEV1 and creatinine stratified for sex. Data are shown as Average ± SD
FEV1 forced expiratory volume in the first second, eGFR estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate
Patients’ characteristics
| eGFR < 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 | eGFR 90–119 mL/min/1.73 m2 | eGFR ≥ 120 mL/min/1.73 m2 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Males N = 126 | 22.2% (28 pts) | 50% (63 pts) | 27.8% (35 pts) | 126 |
| Females N = 100 | 37% (37 pts) | 34% (34 pts) | 29% (29 pts) | 100 |
| Total N = 226 | 28.8% (65 pts) | 42,9% (97 pts) | 28.3% (64 pts) | 226 |
| p value (using Chi squared test (χ2 2df) | 0.023 |
Mean eGFR comparison between sex stratified groups. Data are shown as Average ± SD
eGFR estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate, pts patients
Patients’ characteristics
| FEV1 ≤ 50% | FEV1 51–90% | FEV1 > 90% | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Males N = 126 | 27,2% (34 pts) | 41,6% (52 pts) | 31,2% (39 pts) | 125 |
| Females N = 100 | 24,5% (24 pts) | 49% (48 pts) | 26,5% (26 pts) | 98 |
| Total N = 226 | 26% (58 pts) | 44,8% (100 pts) | 29,1% (65 pts) | 223 |
| p value (using Chi squared test (χ2 2df) | 0.540 |
Mean FEV1 comparison between sex stratified groups. Data are shown as Average ± SD
FEV1 forced expiratory volume in the first second, pts patients
Patients’ characteristics
| eGFR < 90 mL/min/1,73 m2 | eGFR 90–119 mL/min/1.73 m2 | eGFR > 120 mL/min/1.73 m2 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mutationclass I | 25% (7 pts) | 39.3% (11 pts) | 35.7% (10 pts) | 28 |
| Mutationclass II | 24.7% (39 pts) | 45.6% (72 pts) | 29.7% (47 pts) | 158 |
| Mutationclass III | 0 | 66.7% (2 pts) | 33.3% (1 pts) | 3 |
| Mutationclass IV | 62.5% (5 pts) | 25% (2 pts) | 12.5% (1 pts) | 8 |
| Mutationclass V | 33.3% (4 pts) | 41.7% (5 pts) | 25% (3 pts) | 12 |
| Total | 26.3% (55 pts) | 44% (92 pts) | 29.7% (62 pts) | 209 |
| p value (using Chi squared test (χ2 8df) | 0.467 |
Data are shown as Average ± SD; Stratification into three groups according to eGFR for each CFTR mutation class
eGFR estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate, pts patients
eGFR and FEV1 in transplanted and non-transplanted CF patients
| Non-transplanted patients | Transplanted patients | p value (using t-test) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 110.38 ± 28.1 | 73.11 ± 22.7 | 0.001 |
| FEV1 (%) | 71.34 ± 27.1 | 71.89 ± 27.3 | 0.920 |
Data are show as Average ± SD
eGFR estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate, FEV1 forced expiratory volume in the first second, CF cystic fibrosis
Fig. 1eGFR report and age in transplanted and non-transplanted patients. eGFR estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate
Patients’ characteristics
| eGFR | Age (years) | SUA (mmol/L) | 25-OH-VitD (ng/mL) | Glycemia (mmol/L) | HbA1c (%) | Triglycerides (mmol/L) | Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | LDL (mmol/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| < 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 | 41.64 ± 10.39 | 0.38 ± 0.10 | 26.85 ± 13.23 | 5.29 ± 1.31 | 5.98 ± 1.02 | 1.31 ± 0.64 | 4.50 ± 1.05 | 2.21 ± 0.92 |
| 90–119 mL/min/1.73 m2 | 34.63 ± 10.80 | 0.34 ± 0.08 | 25.55 ± 9.70 | 5.41 ± 2.09 | 5.69 ± 0.93 | 1.07 ± 0.60 | 3.90 ± 1.02 | 1.97 ± 0.79 |
| ≥ 120 mL/min/1.73 m2 | 28.54 ± 10.52 | 0.32 ± 0.09 | 21.96 ± 7.80 | 5.29 ± 1.31 | 5.98 ± 1.02 | 0.89 ± 0.39 | 3.41 ± 1.13 | 1.72 ± 0.89 |
| p value (using ANOVA) | 0.001 | 0.005 | 0.197 | 0.671 | 0.146 | 0.005 | 0.001 | 0.040 |
Lipid and Metabolic profile in relation to eGFR and age in CF patients. Data are shown as Average ± SD
CF cystic fibrosis, eGFR estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate, LDL low-density, SUA Serum Uric Acid, 25-OH-VitD 25-hydroxy-vitamin D, HbA1c hemoglobin A1c. lipoprotein cholesterol, CF cystic fibrosis
Fig. 2Relationship triglycerides and eGFR in transplanted and non-transplanted patients. eGFR estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate