| Literature DB >> 31766673 |
Jie Deng1, Jing Li2, Zhe Xiao2, Shuang Song2, Luming Li1,3.
Abstract
Supercapacitors have the rapid charge/discharge kinetics and long stability in comparison with various batteries yet undergo low energy density. Theoretically, square dependence of energy density upon voltage reveals a fruitful but challenging engineering tenet to address this long-standing problem by keeping a large voltage window in the compositionally/structurally fine-tuned electrode/electrolyte systems. Inspired by this, a facile salt-templating enables hierarchically porous biochars for supercapacitors filled by the high-voltage ionic liquids (ILs). Resultant nanostructures possess a coherent/interpenetrated framework of curved atom-thick sidewalls of 0.8-/1.5-nanometer pores to reconcile the pore-size-dependent adlayer structures of ILs in nanopores. Surprisingly, this narrow dual-model pore matches ionic radii of selected ILs to accommodate ions by unique coupled nano-/bi-layer nanoconfinements, augmenting the degree of confinement (DoC). The high DoC efficiently undermines the coulombic ordering networks and induces the local conformational oscillations, thus triggering an anomalous but robust charge separation. This novel bi-/mono-layer nanoconfinement combination mediates harmful overscreening/overcrowding effects to reinforce ion-partitioning, mitigating long-lasting conflicts of power/energy densities. This interesting result differs from a long-held viewpoint regarding the sieving effect that ion-in-pore capacitance peaks only if pore size critically approaches the ion dimension. Optimal biocarbon finally presents a very high/stable operational voltage up to 4 V and specific energy/power rating (88.3 Whkg-1 at 1 kWkg-1, 47.7 Whkg-1 albeit at a high battery-accessible specific power density of 20 kWkg-1), overwhelmingly outperforming most hitherto-reported supercapacitors and some batteries. Such attractive charge storage level can preliminarily elucidate an alternative form of a super-ionic-state high-energy storage linked with both the coordination number and coulombic periodism of the few ion-sized mesopores inside carbon electrodes, escalating supercapacitors into a novel criterion of charge delivery.Entities:
Keywords: confinement effect; coulombic ordering; high energy density; ionic liquid; porous carbon; supercapacitor
Year: 2019 PMID: 31766673 PMCID: PMC6956350 DOI: 10.3390/nano9121664
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1(a) The synthesis scheme of the gelatin-derived porous carbon by KNO3-confined pyrolysis strategy. (b–d) SEM and (e–g) TEM images.
Figure 2(a) Pore size distribution from N2 volumetry and (b) Nyquist plots from the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) spectra (measured in the frequency range of 105–0.01 Hz).
The textural and compositional properties of samples.
| Samples | Stotal (m2g−1) a | Smeso (cm2 g−1) | Smicro (cm2 g−1) b | Vtotal (cm3 g−1) c | Vmeso (cm3 g−1) | Vmicro (cm3 g−1) b | Nitrogen Contents (at. %) d |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C-0.25 | 1084.3 | 45.5 | 1038.8 | 0.403 | 0.001 | 0.402 | 9.45 |
| C-0.5 | 2050.3 | 280.2 | 1770.1 | 0.825 | 0.107 | 0.718 | 5.52 |
| C-0.75 | 2744.6 | 880.5 | 1864.1 | 1.304 | 0.478 | 0.826 | 1.68 |
a calculated via the multi-point BET (Brunauer-Emmett-Teller) method; b gauged by the t-plot way (adsorption thickness was controlled at 0.3–0.5 nm); c computed from the QSDFT (quenched solid density functional theory) equilibrium model and d identified through XPS measurement.
Figure 3Electrochemical performance of two-electrode symmetric supercapacitors (SCs) in (a–c) EMIBF4 ionic liquids (ILs). (a) Cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves conducted at 20 mVs−1, (b) chronopotentionmetry (CP) curves at 0.5 Ag−1 and (c) rate capability. (d) Ragone plot. (e) Illustration of the assembled 4 V coin-cell using C-0.75 as electrode materials. (f) Its practical demonstrations in lighting LEDs with different colors/working voltages or in parallel.
A summary of the key performance parameters such as specific capacitance, rate capacity, energy-power density and capacity retention.
| Samples | Specific Capacitance (F g−1) at 0.5 A g−1 | Specific Capacitance (F g−1) at 10 A g−1 | Rate Capacity from 0.5 to 10 A g−1 | Energy Density (Wh kg−1) at 1 kW kg−1 | Energy Density (Wh kg−1) at 20 kW kg−1 | Capacity Retention at 10 A g−1 over 5000 Cycles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C-0.25 | 4.8 | 1.7 | 35.0% | 2.7 | 0.94 | 100% |
| C-0.5 | 54.7 | 22.4 | 41.0% | 30.4 | 12.4 | 87.0% |
| C-0.75 | 158.9 | 85.9 | 54.0% | 88.3 | 47.7 | 83.3% |
Figure 4Configurational anomalies of EMIBF4 situated in different carbon surfaces. Notional negative electrode-electrolyte interfaces working in EMIBF4 restricted to standard open carbon surfaces (a), single ion-sized pore (b) and double ion-sized pore (c). Local ordering transitions including the perturbations of the ion coordination number and the ion phase conformations underlie the efficient energy storages.
The wholistic capacitance distribution per unit specific surface area (Csur) or per unit specific pore volume (Cvol).
| Samples | Csur at 0.5 A g−1 | Csur at 10 A g−1 | Cvol at 0.5 A g−1 | Cvol at 10 A g−1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C-0.25 | 0.44 µF cm−2 | 0.16 µF cm−2 | 11.9 F cm−3 | 4.2 F cm−3 |
| C-0.5 | 2.67 µF cm−2 | 1.09 µF cm−2 | 66.5 F cm−3 | 27.2 F cm−3 |
| C-0.75 | 5.80 µF cm−2 | 3.20 µF cm−2 | 122.0 F cm−3 | 65.9 F cm−3 |
Figure 5(a) Surface-normalized capacity versus pore size. (b) Specific capacity at 0.5 Ag−1 versus SSA (specific surface area), and slopes of the lines are proportional to relative permittivity ε (based on C = εS/d).