| Literature DB >> 31766525 |
Jaweb Ben Messaoud1, Jean-François Michaud1, Dominique Certon1, Massimo Camarda2, Nicolò Piluso3, Laurent Colin1, Flavien Barcella1, Daniel Alquier1.
Abstract
The stress state is a crucial parameter for the design of innovative microelectromechanical systems based on silicon carbide (SiC) material. Hence, mechanical properties of such structures highly depend on the fabrication process. Despite significant progresses in thin-film growth and fabrication process, monitoring the strain of the suspended SiC thin-films is still challenging. However, 3C-SiC membranes on silicon (Si) substrates have been demonstrated, but due to the low quality of the SiC/Si heteroepitaxy, high levels of residual strains were always observed. In order to achieve promising self-standing films with low residual stress, an alternative micromachining technique based on electrochemical etching of high quality homoepitaxy 4H-SiC layers was evaluated. This work is dedicated to the determination of their mechanical properties and more specifically, to the characterization of a 4H-SiC freestanding film with a circular shape. An inverse problem method was implemented, where experimental results obtained from bulge test are fitted with theoretical static load-deflection curves of the stressed membrane. To assess data validity, the dynamic behavior of the membrane was also investigated: Experimentally, by means of laser Doppler vibrometry (LDV) and theoretically, by means of finite element computations. The two methods provided very similar results since one obtained a Young's modulus of 410 GPa and a residual stress value of 41 MPa from bulge test against 400 GPa and 30 MPa for the LDV analysis. The determined Young's modulus is in good agreement with literature values. Moreover, residual stress values demonstrate that the fabrication of low-stressed SiC films is achievable thanks to the micromachining process developed.Entities:
Keywords: 4H-SiC; FEM; Young’s modulus; bulge test; bulk micromachining; circular membrane; electrochemical etching; mechanical properties; residual stress; vibrometry
Year: 2019 PMID: 31766525 PMCID: PMC6953090 DOI: 10.3390/mi10120801
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 2.891
Figure 1(a) Laser Scanning Microscope (LSM) image of the 4H-SiC membrane using stitching mode, obtained after the electrochemical etching (ECE) process. Circular insert added to show that the 4H-SiC membrane can be assimilated as a circle. (b) Focused ion beam (FIB) cross-section image allowing the membrane thickness determination.
Figure 2Schematic cross-sectional membrane with initial in-plane tension under uniform pressure P.
C1 and C2 coefficients for circular membranes.
| Models | C1 | C2 | C2(υ = 0.25) | Approach |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lin [ | 4.0 | (7 − υ)/3 | 2.25 | Energy minimization |
| Beams [ | 4.0 | 8/3 | 2.67 | Spherical cap |
| Small et al. [ | 4.0 | (8/3) × (1 − 0.241 × υ) | 2.51 | Finite Element Method |
| Pan et al. [ | 4.0 | (8/3)/(1.026 + 0.233 × υ) | 2.46 | Finite Element Method |
| Hohlfelder et al. [ | 4.0 | (8/3) × (1.015 − 0.247 × υ) | 2.54 | Number approximation |
| Timoshenko et al. [ |
| (8/3) × 0.976/(1 + υ) | 2.08 | Energy minimization |
Figure 3(a) Schematic of bulge test apparatus; (b) deflection of the circular 4H-SiC membrane, before and after, sample mounting; (c) typical topography used to measure the diaphragm deflection with LSM measurement.
Figure 4(a) Schematic diagram of the resonance frequency method. Vibration mode shapes measured using laser Doppler vibrometry for (b) (1, 1); (c) (0, 2); and (d) (1, 2) modes.
Figure 5Dot line: Bulge test results for 4H-SiC diaphragm. Solid line: Theoretical fit.
Parameters used for both bulge test and finite element method (FEM) calculations.
| Parameters | Values |
|---|---|
| 3.0 × 108 | |
| 4.6 × 1017 | |
| Density (kg/m3) | 3210 |
| Poisson’s ratio | 0.25 |
| Membrane radius (µm) | 2250 |
| Membrane thickness (µm) | 8.8 |
Bulge test results depending on the models used.
| Models | ||
|---|---|---|
| Lin [ | 452 | 41 |
| Beams et al. [ | 380 | 41 |
| Small et al. [ | 405 | 41 |
| Pan et al. [ | 413 | 41 |
| Hohlfelder [ | 400 | 41 |
| Mean value | 410 | 41 |
Figure 6Measured spectrum of vibration of the 4H-SiC membrane associated with the corresponding mode shapes.
Figure 7(a) Dashed lines: Computed resonance frequencies obtained with FEM calculations using the bulge test results. Solid line: Adjusted FEM calculations with the couple (E, σ0). Square symbols: Measured resonance frequencies determined with the vibrometry method; (b) calculated resonance frequency depending on E and σ0. Dot line: Measured resonance frequency for the (0, 1) mode. Symbol lines: Calculated resonance frequencies depending on the residual stress and Young’s modulus values.
Figure 8(a) LSM cross-section image of the etching profile; (b) LSM image of the membrane-undercut boundary.