| Literature DB >> 31766395 |
Yuri Estrin1,2, Natalia Martynenko3,4, Natalia Anisimova4,5, Diana Temralieva3,4, Mikhail Kiselevskiy4,5, Vladimir Serebryany3, Georgy Raab6, Boris Straumal4,7, Björn Wiese8, Regine Willumeit-Römer8, Sergey Dobatkin3,4.
Abstract
The effect of equal-channel angular pressing (ECAP) on the microstructure, texture, mechanical properties, corrosion resistance and cytotoxicity of two magnesium-silver alloys, Mg-2.0%Ag and Mg-4.0%Ag, was studied. Their average grain size was found to be reduced to 3.2 ± 1.4 μm and 2.8 ± 1.3 μm, respectively. Despite the substantial grain refinement, a drop in the strength characteristics of the alloys was observed, which can be attributed to the formation of inclined basal texture. On a positive side, an increase in tensile ductility to ~34% for Mg-2.0%Ag and ~27% for Mg-4.0%Ag was observed. This effect can be associated with the activity of basal and prismatic slip induced by ECAP. One of the ECAP regimes tested gave rise to a drop in the corrosion resistance of both alloys. An interesting observation was a cytotoxic effect both alloys had on tumor cells in vitro. This effect was accompanied with the release of lactate dehydrogenase, an increase in oxidative stress, coupled with the induction of NO-ions and an increase in the content of such markers of apoptosis as Annexin V and Caspase 3/7. Differences in the chemical composition and the processing history-dependent microstructure of the alloys did not have any significant effect on the magnitude of their antiproliferative effect.Entities:
Keywords: biomedical materials; cytotoxicity in vitro; equal-channel angular pressing; magnesium alloys; mechanical properties; microstructure; texture
Year: 2019 PMID: 31766395 PMCID: PMC6926692 DOI: 10.3390/ma12233832
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1The equal-channel angular pressing (ECAP) processing regimes employed. (N denotes the number of passes at a given temperature.).
Figure 2Structure of Mg-2.0%Ag (a,c,d) and Mg-4.0%Ag (b,e,f) alloys in the initial state (a,b) and after ECAP according to the first (c,e) and second (d,f) processing regimes.
Mechanical properties of Mg-2.0% Ag and Mg-4.0% Ag alloys in various states.
| Processing | YS, MPa | UTS, MPa | El, % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mg-2.0%Ag | Initial state | 147 ± 7 | 220 ± 3 | 17.2 ± 2.7 |
| ECAP, Regime 1 | 35 ± 5 | 179 ± 1 | 34.0 ± 4.2 | |
| ECAP, Regime 2 | 53 ± 5 | 182 ± 7 | 23.7 ± 0.6 | |
| Mg-4.0%Ag | Initial state | 157 ± 6 | 225 ± 2 | 20.2 ± 0.3 |
| ECAP, Regime 1 | 35 ± 5 | 177 ± 33 | 20.8 ± 7.4 | |
| ECAP, Regime 2 | 42 ± 5 | 204 ± 5 | 27.3 ± 2.1 | |
Figure 3Engineering stress–strain response of Mg-2.0%Ag (a) and Mg-4.0%Ag (b) alloys before and after ECAP.
Figure 4{0004} and {110} pole figures and cross sections of orientation distribution function (ODF) of Mg-2.0%Ag (a) and Mg-4.0%Ag (b) alloys in the initial state and after ECAP (LD-longitudinal direction, TD-transverse direction).
The main orientations and their volume fractions for Mg-2.0%Ag and Mg-4.0%Ag alloys in the initial state and after ECAP. (The angles φ1, Φ and φ2 are the Euler angles and ω the volume fraction of the respective orientation.).
| State of the Alloys | (hkil)<uvtw> | ϕ1 | Φ | ϕ2 | ω | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| (0001)<6 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0.02 |
| ( | 90 | 65 | 20 | 0.05 | ||
| (2.16. | 84 | 82 | 35 | 0.03 | ||
|
| (19. | 166 | 45 | 35 | 0.07 | |
| (19. | 143 | 45 | 35 | 0.04 | ||
| (19. | 2 | 56 | 35 | 0.03 | ||
|
| ( | 36 | 90 | 0 | 0.10 | |
| (03 | 37 | 80 | 30 | 0.05 | ||
| ( | 32 | 60 | 20 | 0.04 | ||
|
|
| (0001)<10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.01 |
| (14 | 86 | 17 | 40 | 0.03 | ||
| (14 | 95 | 71 | 40 | 0.02 | ||
| (15 | 88 | 39 | 40 | 0.02 | ||
| (14 | 86 | 52 | 40 | 0.02 | ||
| (29. | 90 | 90 | 40 | 0.02 | ||
|
| ( | 46 | 75 | 25 | 0.06 | |
| ( | 58 | 57 | 20 | 0.04 | ||
| ( | 67 | 78 | 5 | 0.04 | ||
| (45 | 60 | 70 | 55 | 0.04 | ||
|
| (23 | 20 | 60 | 55 | 0.06 | |
| (24 | 25 | 84 | 50 | 0.04 | ||
| (02 | 10 | 75 | 30 | 0.04 | ||
| ( | 30 | 80 | 15 | 0.03 | ||
Orientation factors for deformation systems of the alloys studied.
| State of the Alloys | Basal | Prismatic | Pyramidal | Twinning | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Initial state | 4.7 | 5.1 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| ECAP Regime 1 | 4.1 | 5.2 | 5.0 | 5.4 | |
| ECAP Regime 2 | 5.5 | 4.1 | 4.9 | 4.8 | |
|
| Initial state | 4.8 | 5.3 | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| ECAP Regime 1 | 5.1 | 4.3 | 4.9 | 4.9 | |
| ECAP Regime 2 | 4.9 | 4.4 | 4.9 | 4.9 | |
Figure 5Degradation rate of Mg-2.0%Ag (a) and Mg-4.0%Ag (b) samples in the initial state and after ECAP processing (regime 2).
Figure 6Increasing lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level in the cell growth medium in comparison with the control (* p < 0.05). Time of incubation of tumor cells with alloys of Mg-2.0%Ag and Mg-4.0% Ag in the initial state (IS) and ECAP-treated (regime 2) state-2 and 4 h.
Figure 7Effect of Mg-2.0%Ag and Mg-4.0%Ag alloys in the initial state (IS) and after ECAP (regime 2) on the viability of tumor cells (* p < 0.05).
Figure 8Increase of Annexin V (+) cells concentration after incubation with samples of Mg-2.0%Ag and Mg-4.0% Ag alloys in the initial state (IS) and after ECAP compared to the control (a) Annexin V(+) cells concentration; (b) difference with control) (* p < 0.05).
Figure 9Increase of Caspase 3/7 (+) cells concentration after incubation with samples of Mg-2.0%Ag and Mg-4.0%Ag alloys in the initial state and after ECAP in comparison with the control (* p < 0.05).
Figure 10Production of NO ions (a) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) (b) by tumor cells during co-incubation with samples of Mg-2.0%Ag and Mg-4.0%Ag alloys in the initial state and after ECAP (regime 2, which is associated with oxidative stress in the cells in comparison with the control (* p < 0.05).