| Literature DB >> 31766378 |
Massimo Calovi1, Emanuela Callone2, Riccardo Ceccato1, Flavio Deflorian1, Stefano Rossi1, Sandra Dirè2.
Abstract
The functional properties displayed by graphene oxide (GO)-polymer nanocomposites are strongly affected by the dispersion ability of GO sheets in the polymeric matrix, which can be largely improved by functionalization with organosilanes. The grafting to GO of organosilanes with the general formula RSi(OCH3)3 is generally explained by the condensation reactions of silanols with GO reactive groups. In this study, the influence of the organic group on the RSi(OCH3)3 grafting ability was analyzed in depth, taking into account the interactions of the R end chain group with GO oxidized groups. Model systems composed of commercial graphene oxide reacted with 3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane (APTMS), 3-mercaptopropyltrimethoxysilane (MPTMS), and 3-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane, (MaPTMS), respectively, were characterized by natural abundance 13C, 15N and 29Si solid state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), x-ray diffraction (XRD), and electron spin resonance (ESR). The silane organic tail significantly impacts the grafting, both in terms of the degree of functionalization and direct interaction with GO reactive sites. Both the NMR and XRD proved that this is particularly relevant for APTMS and to a lower extent for MPTMS. Moreover, the epoxy functional groups on the GO sheets appeared to be the preferential anchoring sites for the silane condensation reaction. The characterization approach was applied to the GO samples prepared by the nitric acid etching of graphene and functionalized with the same organosilanes, which were used as a filler in acrylic coatings obtained by cataphoresis, making it possible to correlate the structural properties and the corrosion protection ability of the layers.Entities:
Keywords: ESR; XRD; grafting; graphene oxide; organosilanes; solid state NMR
Year: 2019 PMID: 31766378 PMCID: PMC6926944 DOI: 10.3390/ma12233828
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Scheme 1Molecular structure of (a) Graphenea, (b) 3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane (APTMS), (c) 3-mercaptopropyltrimethoxysilane (MPTMS), and (d) 3-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane (MaPTMS). The numbering of carbon atoms used for the peak assignment in the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra is also shown.
Figure 113C solid state NMR spectra of the samples Ga, Ga-N, Ga-S, and Ga-M. (a) Decoupled MAS and (b) CPMAS.
Assignment and amount of the main identified peaks [15,16] calculated from the profile fitting of the 13C MAS spectrum of Ga (Figure S1, Electronic Supplementary Materials).
| δ(iso) ppm | Functional Group | Amount % |
|---|---|---|
| 190 | C=O | 4.4 |
| 180 | C=O | 0.9 |
| 164 | O=C–O | 2.0 |
| 129 | C=C | 30.2 |
| 95 | O–C–O (lactol) | 3.0 |
| 69 | C–OH | 30.6 |
| 58 | C–O–C (epoxy) | 28.9 |
Comparison of the number of oxidized C sites, extent of functionalization, and preferential anchoring sites in the different samples. Data were obtained through the profile fitting analysis of the 13C MAS spectra.
| Sample | (C–OH + C–O–C(epoxy) + C=O) Normalized Area 1 (70–60, 180 ppm) | [COH + COC (epoxy)]/(R’O)3-Si-R Ratio 2 | COH/COC (epoxy) Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 2.1 | 1.1 | |
|
| 1.3 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
|
| 1.0 | 2.3 | 1.3 |
|
| 1.8 | 10 3 | 1.0 |
1 Normalized with respect to the aromatic peak in the range of 134–125. 2 Ratio between COH + COC integrals and the integration of the region at 40–0 ppm, containing the three propyl methylene groups belonging to silane divided by three. According to propagation error theory, the reported value is a lower limit. 3 For sample Ga-M, the integration was done in the region 25–0 ppm, containing three peaks belonging to MaPTMS and the resulted integral is divided by three; this amount is subtracted from the 70–60 resonance that also convolutes the C-3 of the MaPTMS for comparison with the Ga-N and Ga-S results.
Figure 215N CPMAS NMR spectra of the sample Ga-N prepared with the Ga:APTMS ratio of 1:1 and 1:0.1, respectively.
Figure 3XRD diffractograms of the pristine and functionalized Ga samples.
Figure 413C CPMAS spectra of samples GO-N, GO-S, and GO-M.
Figure 5First derivative X-band cwESR spectra of the pristine and functionalized (a) Ga and (b) GO samples at room temperature.
ESR results of the modified graphene samples.
| Sample | IF (peak-to-peak) 1 | Total Area (*106) 2 |
|---|---|---|
| G | 7362.1 | 630 |
| GO | 275.8 | 4.69 |
| GO-N | 389.9 | 0.22 |
| GO-S | 1775.7 | 1.16 |
| GO-M | 9927.3 | 5.54 |
| Ga | 136.1 | 30.6 |
| Ga-N | 506.6 | 2.57 |
| Ga-S | 2790.6 | 19.6 |
| Ga-M | 1216.5 | 55.6 |
1 IF is the intensity of the sharp peak. 2 The total area refers to the overall spectrum integral.