| Literature DB >> 31766330 |
Zhaoqiang Chen1,2, Shuai Zhang1, Runxin Guo1, Lianggang Ji1, Niansheng Guo1, Qi Li1, Chonghai Xu1,2.
Abstract
Aiming at the contradiction between the lubricating performance and mechanical performance of self-lubricating ceramic tools. CaF2@Al(OH)3 particles were prepared by the heterogeneous nucleation method. An Al2O3/Ti(C,N) ceramic tool with CaF2@Al2(OH)3 particles and ZrO2 whiskers was prepared by hot press sintering (frittage). The cutting performances and wear mechanisms of this ceramic tool were investigated. Compared with the Al2O3/Ti(C,N) ceramic tool, the Al2O3/Ti(C,N)/ZrO2/CaF2@Al(OH)3 ceramic tool had lower cutting temperatures and surface roughness. When the cutting speed was increased from 100m/min to 300m/min, a lot of CaF2 was smeared onto the surface of the ceramic tool, and the flank wear of the Al2O3/Ti(C,N)/ZrO2/CaF2@Al(OH)3 ceramic tool was reduced. The main wear mechanisms of the Al2O3/Ti(C,N)/ZrO2/CaF2@Al(OH)3 ceramic tool were adhesive wear and micro-chipping. The formation of solid lubricating film and the improvement of fracture toughness by adding ZrO2 whiskers and CaF2@Al(OH)3 were important factors for the Al2O3/Ti(C,N)/ZrO2/CaF2@Al(OH)3 ceramic tool to have better cutting performances.Entities:
Keywords: ZrO2 whisker; ceramic tool; coating; cutting performance; wear mechanisms
Year: 2019 PMID: 31766330 PMCID: PMC6926542 DOI: 10.3390/ma12233820
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Schematic diagram of CaF2@Al(OH)3 preparation.
Composition of workpiece material 40Cr (wt %).
| Workpiece | C | Si | Mn | Cr | Ni | S | P | Fe |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40Cr | 0.37–0.45 | 0.17–0.37 | 0.5–0.8 | 0.8–1.1 | ≤0.03 | ≤0.035 | ≤0.035 | Bal. |
Figure 2Photographs of ceramic tool, tool holders and test benches.
The mechanical property of ceramic tool materials.
| Tools | Compositions | Flexural Strength | Fracture Toughness | Hardness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATCN | Al2O3/Ti(C,N) | 555 ± 16.65 | 5.78 ± 0.17 | 20.47 ± 0.61 |
| ATCN-Z-C | Al2O3/Ti(C,N)/6vol%ZrO2/10vol%CaF2@Al(OH)3 | 540 ± 16.2 | 7.16 ± 0.21 | 16.72 ± 0.50 |
Figure 3(a) Pre-sintered powder; (b) fracture surface and (c) XRD detection diagram of the ATCN-Z-C ceramic tool material.
Figure 4Cutting temperature of ATCN and ATCN-Z-C ceramic tools at cutting speed of 100, 200 and 300 m/min. (Test conditions: depth of cut α = 0.2 mm, feed rates f = 0.102 mm/r).
Figure 5Flank wear of ATCN and ATCN-Z-C ceramic tools at cutting speed of (a) 100; (b) 200 and (c) 300 m/min. (Test conditions: depth of cut α = 0.2 mm, feed rates f = 0.102 mm/r).
Figure 6Surface roughness of ATCN and ATCN-Z-C ceramic tools at cutting speed of (a) 100; (b) 200 and (c) 300 m/min. (Test conditions: depth of cut α = 0.2 mm, feed rates f = 0.102 mm/r).
Figure 7Wear profile of the rake faces of the (a) ATCN and (b) ATCN-Z-C ceramic tools, the flank face of (c) ATCN and (d) ATCN-Z-C ceramic tools. (Test conditions: depth of cut α = 0.2 mm, feed rates f = 0.102 mm/r, cutting speed υ = 300 m/min)
Figure 8(a) High magnification scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs of the rake face of the ATCN-Z-C tool and (b) the F element distribution.