Literature DB >> 31764256

HIV-Related Implementation Research for Key Populations: Designing for Individuals, Evaluating Across Populations, and Integrating Context.

Sheree R Schwartz1, Amrita Rao, Katherine B Rucinski, Carrie Lyons, Nikita Viswasam, Carly A Comins, Oluwasolape Olawore, Stefan Baral.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Key populations, including men who have sex with men, transgender people, sex workers, people who inject drugs, and incarcerated populations, experience high burdens of HIV and urgently need effective interventions. Yet the evidence base for implementation research (IR) with key populations remains weak and poses specific challenges to epidemiologic inference. We apply the Consolidated Framework for IR to consider specific challenges and recommendations for IR with key populations. DISCUSSION: Individuals within key populations exist within inner and outer settings-including organizational structures, legal (eg, criminalization), and funding environments-which influence the design, adoption and fidelity of interventions, and the potential sustainability of intervention scale-up. Underlying vulnerabilities and external stressors experienced at the individual level (eg, homelessness, violence) further impact participation and retention in IR. Thus, researchers should account for representation in the research process, beginning with community engagement in IR design and consideration of enumeration/sampling methods for key populations who lack probabilistic sampling frames. Interventions for key populations require substantial adaptation and complexity (eg, individually tailored, multicomponent) to ensure appropriateness; however, there is tension between the need for complexity and challenges to internal validity (fidelity) and external validity (generalizable scale-up). Finally, integrating contextual, sampling, and implementation elements into analytic approaches is critical for effectiveness evaluation.
CONCLUSIONS: Translation of efficacious findings at the individual level to effectiveness at the population level requires recognition of risk heterogeneity. Recognizing the nuances of working with key populations is essential to ensure that individuals are represented by design and therefore gains in population health can be achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31764256      PMCID: PMC6880803          DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr        ISSN: 1525-4135            Impact factor:   3.731


  48 in total

1.  Structural and environmental barriers to condom use negotiation with clients among female sex workers: implications for HIV-prevention strategies and policy.

Authors:  Kate Shannon; Steffanie A Strathdee; Jean Shoveller; Melanie Rusch; Thomas Kerr; Mark W Tyndall
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  The disconnect between individual-level and population-level HIV prevention benefits of antiretroviral treatment.

Authors:  Stefan Baral; Amrita Rao; Patrick Sullivan; Nancy Phaswana-Mafuya; Daouda Diouf; Greg Millett; Helgar Musyoki; Elvin Geng; Sharmistha Mishra
Journal:  Lancet HIV       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 12.767

3.  Perceived Versus Calculated HIV Risk: Implications for Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Uptake in a Randomized Trial of Men Who Have Sex With Men.

Authors:  Jill Blumenthal; Sonia Jain; Evan Mulvihill; Shelly Sun; Marvin Hanashiro; Eric Ellorin; Sara Graber; Richard Haubrich; Sheldon Morris
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.731

4.  The immediate eff ect of the Same-Sex Marriage Prohibition Act on stigma, discrimination, and engagement on HIV prevention and treatment services in men who have sex with men in Nigeria: analysis of prospective data from the TRUST cohort.

Authors:  Sheree R Schwartz; Rebecca G Nowak; Ifeanyi Orazulike; Babajide Keshinro; Julie Ake; Sara Kennedy; Ogbonnaya Njoku; William A Blattner; Manhattan E Charurat; Stefan D Baral
Journal:  Lancet HIV       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 12.767

Review 5.  Epidemiological challenges to the assessment of HIV burdens among key populations: respondent-driven sampling, time-location sampling and demographic and health surveys.

Authors:  Keith M Sabin; Lisa G Johnston
Journal:  Curr Opin HIV AIDS       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.283

6.  The highest attainable standard of evidence (HASTE) for HIV/AIDS interventions: toward a public health approach to defining evidence.

Authors:  Stefan D Baral; Andrea Wirtz; Frangiscos Sifakis; Benjamin Johns; Damian Walker; Chris Beyrer
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 7.  Implementing Implementation Science: An Approach for HIV Prevention, Care and Treatment Programs.

Authors:  Barrot H Lambdin; Ben Cheng; Trevor Peter; Jessie Mbwambo; Tsitsi Apollo; Megan Dunbar; Ifeoma C Udoh; Adithya Cattamanchi; Elvin H Geng; Paul Volberding
Journal:  Curr HIV Res       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.581

Review 8.  Antiretroviral therapy uptake, attrition, adherence and outcomes among HIV-infected female sex workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Elisa Mountain; Sharmistha Mishra; Peter Vickerman; Michael Pickles; Charles Gilks; Marie-Claude Boily
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Potential Impact of Integrated Stigma Mitigation Interventions in Improving HIV/AIDS Service Delivery and Uptake for Key Populations in Senegal.

Authors:  Carrie E Lyons; Sosthenes Ketende; Daouda Diouf; Fatou M Drame; Benjamin Liestman; Karleen Coly; Cheikh Ndour; Gnilane Turpin; Souleymane Mboup; Karim Diop; Coumba Toure-Kane; Delivette Castor; Nafissatou Leye-Diouf; Stefan Baral
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 3.731

10.  Sampling Key Populations for HIV Surveillance: Results From Eight Cross-Sectional Studies Using Respondent-Driven Sampling and Venue-Based Snowball Sampling.

Authors:  Amrita Rao; Shauna Stahlman; James Hargreaves; Sharon Weir; Jessie Edwards; Brian Rice; Duncan Kochelani; Mpumelelo Mavimbela; Stefan Baral
Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill       Date:  2017-10-20
View more
  4 in total

1.  Five Common Myths Limiting Engagement in HIV-Related Implementation Research.

Authors:  Laura K Beres; Sheree Schwartz; Aaloke Mody; Elvin H Geng; Stefan Baral
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.771

Review 2.  Implementing Implementation Research: Teaching Implementation Research to HIV Researchers.

Authors:  Sheree R Schwartz; J D Smith; Christopher Hoffmann; Bhakti Hansoti; Sharmistha Mishra; Arianna Rubin Means; Vivian Go; Kenneth Sherr; Denis Nash; Patrick Sullivan; Stefan Baral
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 5.071

3.  HIV Testing Approaches to Optimize Prevention and Treatment for Key and Priority Populations in Malawi.

Authors:  Katherine Rucinski; Louis Masankha Banda; Oluwasolape Olawore; Chris Akolo; Allison Zakaliya; David Chilongozi; Sheree Schwartz; Rose Wilcher; Navindra Persaud; Melchiade Ruberintwari; Stefan Baral
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 3.835

4.  Evaluating the quality of HIV epidemiologic evidence for populations in the absence of a reliable sampling frame: a modified quality assessment tool.

Authors:  Amrita Rao; Sheree Schwartz; Nikita Viswasam; Katherine Rucinski; Kimiko Van Wickle; Keith Sabin; Tisha Wheeler; Jinkou Zhao; Stefan Baral
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 3.797

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.