Literature DB >> 31763873

Methodological and statistical advances in the consideration of cultural diversity in assessment: A critical review of group classification and measurement invariance testing.

Kyunghee Han1, Stephen M Colarelli1, Nathan C Weed1.   

Abstract

One of the most important considerations in psychological and educational assessment is the extent to which a test is free of bias and fair for groups with diverse backgrounds. Establishing measurement invariance (MI) of a test or items is a prerequisite for meaningful comparisons across groups as it ensures that test items do not function differently across groups. Demonstration of MI is particularly important in assessment settings where test scores are used in decision making. In this review, we begin with an overview of test bias and fairness, followed by a discussion of issues involving group classification, focusing on categorizations of race/ethnicity and sex/gender. We then describe procedures used to establish MI, detailing steps in the implementation of multigroup confirmatory factor analysis, and discussing recent developments in alternative procedures for establishing MI, such as the alignment method and moderated nonlinear factor analysis, which accommodate reconceptualization of group categorizations. Lastly, we discuss a variety of important statistical and conceptual issues to be considered in conducting multigroup confirmatory factor analysis and related methods and conclude with some recommendations for applications of these procedures. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31763873     DOI: 10.1037/pas0000731

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Assess        ISSN: 1040-3590


  4 in total

Review 1.  The cultural equivalence of measurement in substance use research.

Authors:  Hector I Lopez-Vergara; Manshu Yang; Nicole H Weiss; Amy L Stamates; Nichea S Spillane; Sarah W Feldstein Ewing
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 3.492

2.  Personality inventory for DSM-5 brief form(PID-5-BF) in Chinese students and patients: evaluating the five-factor model and a culturally informed six-factor model.

Authors:  Panwen Zhang; Zirong Ouyang; Shulin Fang; Jiayue He; Lejia Fan; Xingwei Luo; Jianghua Zhang; Yan Xiong; Fusheng Luo; Xiaosheng Wang; Shuqiao Yao; Xiang Wang
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 3.630

3.  The Phubbing Scale (PS-8) in the Portuguese population: psychometric properties.

Authors:  F Javier García-Castro; Ana Maria Abreu; Belén Rando; María J Blanca
Journal:  Psicol Reflex Crit       Date:  2022-03-16

4.  Evaluating the Cross-Cultural Measurement Invariance of the PHQ-9 between American Indian/Alaska Native Adults and Diverse Racial and Ethnic Groups.

Authors:  Melissa L Harry; R Yates Coley; Stephen C Waring; Gregory E Simon
Journal:  J Affect Disord Rep       Date:  2021-02-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.