| Literature DB >> 31763528 |
Xincheng Lu1,2,3,4,5,6, Jianchun Jiang2,3,4,5, Jing He6, Kang Sun2,3,4,5, Yunjuan Sun2,3,4,5.
Abstract
As a high value-added product from biomass pyrolysis, wood vinegar (WV) has been used as a growth regulator for many plant species in agriculture based on the diverse active chemical compounds present. To reveal the relationship between chemical constituents and regulation performance, four kinds of WVs were prepared by slow pyrolysis from Chinese fir waste at different temperature ranges. The chemical constituents of WVs were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, and the regulation performance of WVs was investigated from the aspects of seed germination and root growth of wheat. The results indicated that the chemical constituents of WVs were affected obviously by pyrolysis temperature and the major components were acids and phenols. All types of WVs showed regulation performance but with different effects and levels. The WV collected from 20 to 150 °C exhibited a promoting effect and other three WVs exhibited inhibiting effects. It was considered that the regulation performance of WV was relevant to acids and phenols through a synergy mechanism. Acids caused intercellular acidification and increased root activity, which promoted the seed germination and root growth, while phenols increased the content of malonaldehyde, indicating that phenols caused the oxidative stress to damage cell structure and inhibit growth. All these results could be a reference for further utilization of WVs as a sustainable alternative to chemicals for plant growth regulation in agriculture.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31763528 PMCID: PMC6868606 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b02240
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Properties of WVs from Four Temperature Ranges
| WVs | pH | density (g/mL) | moisture content (%) | yield (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WV-1 | 3.04 | 1.011 | 85.61 | 15.47 |
| WV-2 | 2.90 | 1.036 | 54.55 | 34.09 |
| WV-3 | 3.08 | 1.039 | 52.03 | 3.50 |
| WV-4 | 2.75 | 1.044 | 51.73 | 0.50 |
Figure 1Relative content profiles of five groups of chemical compounds at different pyrolysis temperatures.
Identified Compounds in the WVs Produced from the Slow Pyrolysis of CFW
| contents of organic compounds (area %) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| class | compounds | molecular formula | WV-1 | WV-2 | WV-3 | WV-4 |
| acids | acetic acid | C2H4O2 | 2.75 | 9.17 | 1.67 | 1.66 |
| propanoic acid | C3H6O2 | 3.18 | ||||
| heptylic acid | C7H14O2 | 13.79 | 14.00 | |||
| pentanoic acid | C6H12O2 | 44.65 | 6.75 | 2.03 | 13.95 | |
| 3-methoxy-4-hydroxybenzoic acid | C9H10O4 | 3.65 | 3.76 | 13.68 | ||
| phenols | phenol | C6H6O | 2.66 | 1.07 | 1.20 | |
| 2-methoxy phenol | C7H8O2 | 3.99 | 6.99 | 8.21 | 8.03 | |
| 2-methyl phenol | C7H8O | 1.78 | ||||
| 3-methyl phenol | C7H8O | 1.03 | 2.20 | |||
| maltol | C6H6O2 | 2.52 | 1.67 | |||
| 4-methyl-2-methoxy phenol | C8H10O2 | 1.27 | 7.35 | 1.78 | 5.00 | |
| 1,2-benzenediol | C6H6O2 | 13.17 | 4.68 | 9.79 | ||
| 4-ethyl-2-methoxy phenol | C9H12O2 | 4.22 | 22.91 | |||
| eugenol | C10H12O2 | 4.18 | ||||
| 4-propenyl-2-methoxy phenol | C10H12O2 | 4.10 | 8.13 | |||
| 4-propyl-2-methoxy phenol | C10H14O2 | 3.22 | 10.27 | 9.62 | ||
| 2,6-dimethoxy phenol | C9H12O2 | 1.16 | ||||
| 3-methyl-1,2-benzenediol | C7H8O2 | 3.57 | 1.43 | |||
| 4-methyl-1,2-benzenediol | C7H8O2 | 4.40 | 11.03 | |||
| ketones | 1-hydroxy-2-butanone | C4H8O2 | 1.38 | |||
| acetone | C3H6O | 1.54 | 2.75 | 0.94 | 0.81 | |
| 2-furanone | C4H4O2 | 2.54 | ||||
| 1,2-cyclopentanedione | C5H6O2 | 2.25 | 2.75 | 2.43 | ||
| 3-methyl-1,2-cyclopentanedione | C6H8O2 | 1.67 | 3.58 | 3.00 | 1.18 | |
| 4-hydroxy-3-methoxy hypnone | C9H10O3 | 2.08 | 3.71 | 11.92 | ||
| 3-methoxy hypnone | C9H9O2 | 7.55 | ||||
| aldehydes | furfural | C5H4O2 | 4.65 | 0.99 | 1.78 | |
| 5-methyl-2-furfural | C6H6O2 | 1.61 | 1.99 | |||
| 5-hydroxymethyl furfural | C6H7O3 | 7.10 | 2.19 | |||
| vanilline | C8H8O3 | 3.79 | ||||
| alcohols | 2-furfuryl alcohol | C5H6O2 | 1.28 | |||
| 4-hydroxy-3-methoxy phenethyl alcohol | C9H12O3 | 1.86 | 3.10 | 4.09 | 6.17 | |
Figure 2Effects of WVs on SGP of wheat seed treated with CK, WV-1, WV-2, WV-3, and WV-4. Different small letters represent significant difference among the different WV treatments, which were analyzed by SPSS20.0 (P < 0.05).
Germination Characteristics of Wheat Seed
| number | 3rd day SGP | 5th day SGP | SGR | RSGR | SGI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 16.67a | 33.33b | 42.50b | 1.00b | |
| WV-1 | 17.50a | 47.50a | 60.83a | 43.13 | 1.69a |
| WV-2 | 16.67a | 32.50b | 39.17b | –7.84 | 0.78c |
| WV-3 | 10.83c | 22.50d | 30.00c | –29.41 | 0.28e |
| WV-4 | 12.50b | 26.67c | 35.00c | –17.65 | 0.49d |
Figure 3MRL (a), LRN (b), RU (c), and TFRM (d) of wheat culture treated with CK, WV-1, WV-2, WV-3, and WV-4. Different small letters represent significant difference among the different WV treatments, which were analyzed by SPSS20.0 (P < 0.05).
Figure 4RV of wheat culture treated with CK, WV-1, WV-2, WV-3, and WV-4. Different small letters represent significant difference among the different concentrations of WV treatments, which were analyzed by SPSS20.0 (P < 0.05).
Figure 5Content of MDA of wheat culture treated with CK, WV-1, WV-2, WV-3, and WV-4. Different small letters represent significant difference among the different concentrations of WV treatments, which were analyzed by SPSS20.0 (P < 0.05).
Analysis on Correlation Coefficient between Chemical Components in WVs with Germination and Growth Indicesa
| SGI | SGR | MRL | LRN | RU | TFRM | RV | MDA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| acids | 0.949* | 0.968* | 0.881 | 0.950* | 0.814 | 0.848 | 0.904* | –0.833 |
| phenols | –0.959* | –0.951* | –0.988** | –0.956* | –0.982** | –0.955* | –0.961* | 0.972* |
| ketones | –0.990** | –0.996** | –0.930* | –0.991** | –0.840 | –0.929* | –0.819 | 0.815 |
| aldehydes | –0.266 | –0.334 | –0.082 | –0.272 | –0.003 | –0.024 | 0.112 | 0.122 |
| alcohols | –0.898 | –0.869 | –0.905* | –0.898 | –0.814 | –0.958* | –0.866 | 0.702 |
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
Analysis on Correlation Coefficient between RV, MDA, and Growth Indicesa
| RV | MDA | MRL | LRN | RU | TFRM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RV | 1 | –0.950* | 0.997** | 0.972* | 0.976* | 0.977* |
| MDA | 1 | –0.934* | –0.861 | –0.982** | –0.873 | |
| MRL | 1 | 0.970* | 0.973* | 0.989** | ||
| LRN | 1 | 0.896 | 0.968* | |||
| RU | 1 | 0.937* | ||||
| TFRM | 1 |
*P < 0.05 , **P < 0.01.
Figure 6Schematic diagram of pyrolysis (1) N2; (2) gas flow meter; (3) quartz tube; (4) VTL; (5) temperature controller; (6) condenser.