| Literature DB >> 31763443 |
Takumi Toya1, Kei Ito1, Kazuki Kagami1, Ayumu Osaki1, Atsushi Sato1, Toyokazu Kimura1, Shunpei Horii1, Risako Yasuda1, Takayuki Namba1, Yasuo Ido1, Yuji Nagatomo1, Katsumi Hayashi2, Nobuyuki Masaki3, Hirotaka Yada1, Takeshi Adachi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oxidative posttranslational modifications (OPTM) impair the function of Sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum (SR) calcium (Ca2+) ATPase (SERCA) 2 and trigger cytosolic Ca2+ dysregulation. We investigated the extent of OPTM of SERCA2 in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Myocardial fibrosis; Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy; Oxidative posttranslational modification; SERCA2
Year: 2019 PMID: 31763443 PMCID: PMC6864308 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2019.100437
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc ISSN: 2352-9067
Fig. 1Representative pictures of immunohistochemistry (SERCA2, S-SERCA2, and N-SERCA2) and Masson’s trichrome staining, demonstrating high OPTM of SERCA2 (A) and low OPTM of SERCA2 (B) (scale bar = 200 μm). Black arrow indicates superficial fibrosis.
Baseline characteristics.
| All (N = 40) | Age ≤ 65 (N = 19) | Age > 65 (N = 21) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical parameters | ||||
| Age, yrs | 65.6 ± 11.8 | 59 (50–63) | 74.5 ± 5.2 | |
| Male, n (%) | 25 (62.5) | 11 (57.9) | 14 (66.7) | 0.57 |
| Serum creatinine, mg/dL | 0.89 (0.71–1.1) | 0.76 (0.68–1.12) | 0.93 ± 0.25 | 0.45 |
| eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2 | 62.5 ± 17.9 | 65.9 ± 21.2 | 59.3 ± 14.1 | 0.25 |
| BNP, pg/mL | 199.6 (95.8–376.1) | 205.3 (96–272.5) | 194.1 (100.4–434.7) | 0.70 |
| CRP, mg/dL | 0.3 (0.3–0.48) | 0.3 (0.3–0.5) | 0.3 (0.3–0.6) | 0.68 |
| Medication | ||||
| ARB/ACEI, n (%) | 31 (77.5) | 16 (84.2) | 15 (71.4) | 0.33 |
| β blocker, n (%) | 22 (55) | 11 (57.8) | 11 (52.4) | 0.73 |
| Aldosterone blocker, n (%) | 16 (40) | 11 (57.8) | 5 (23.8) | 0.03 |
| CCB, n (%) | 8 (20) | 2 (10.5) | 6 (28.6) | 0.15 |
| Diuretics, n (%) | 15 (37.5) | 8 (42.1) | 7 (33.3) | 0.57 |
| statins, n (%) | 10 (25) | 3 (15.8) | 7 (33.3) | 0.20 |
| Nitrate, n (%) | 2 (5) | 1 (5.3) | 1 (4.8) | 0.94 |
| Echocardiographic parameters | ||||
| LVEF, % | 37.4 ± 18.4 | 29.6 ± 13.5 | 44.0 ± 19.7 | 0.01 |
| LVEDD, cm | 5.7 ± 0.8 | 6.2 ± 0.8 | 5.3 ± 0.7 | 0.001 |
| LVESD, cm | 4.7 ± 1.2 | 5.3 ± 1.0 | 4.1 ± 1.1 | 0.001 |
| IVS, cm | 0.9 (0.8–1.1) | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 0.12 |
| PW, cm | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 0.9 (0.8–1.1) | 0.80 |
| LAD, cm | 4.4 ± 1.0 | 4.5 ± 0.9 | 4.3 ± 1.0 | 0.46 |
| AOD, cm | 3.0 ± 0.4 | 3.1 ± 0.5 | 2.9 ± 0.3 | 0.3 |
| RVD, cm | 3.0 ± 0.8 | 3.1 ± 0.8 | 2.8 ± 0.8 | 0.55 |
| IVC, cm | 1.4 ± 0.5 | 1.5 ± 0.5 | 1.4 ± 0.5 | 0.56 |
| TRPG, mmHg | 25.4 ± 14.3 | 23.2 ± 14.6 | 27.2 ± 14.2 | 0.42 |
| PRPG, mmHg | 3 (2–6.5) | 3 (2–7.3) | 5 (2–6) | 0.92 |
| E wave velocity, cm/sec | 83.9 ± 26.2 | 85.2 ± 30.9 | 82.8 ± 22.1 | 0.79 |
| A wave velocity, cm/sec | 74.4 ± 26.5 | 74.5 ± 20.0 | 74.4 ± 32.5 | 0.99 |
| DCT, msec | 164 (121–207) | 141 (105–202) | 177 (155–220) | 0.14 |
| E/A | 1.0 (0.7–1.8) | 1.1 (0.6–1.8) | 1.0 (0.7–1.7) | 0.80 |
| E’ velocity, cm/sec | 5.0 ± 2.0 | 5.1 ± 2.4 | 5.0 ± 1.7 | 0.91 |
| E/e’ | 16.5 (12.3–22.3) | 16.1 (11.3–26.2) | 16.9 (13.7–22.2) | 0.95 |
| Immunohistochemical analysis | ||||
| SERCA% | 24.3 ± 8.8 | 23 ± 9.1 | 25.5 ± 8.5 | 0.38 |
| S-SERCA% | 16.5 ± 10.6 | 11.9 ± 5.1 | 20.1 ± 12.6 | 0.007 |
| N-SERCA% | 25.0 ± 10.8 | 21.4 ± 8.7 | 28.1 ± 11.6 | 0.04 |
| S-SERCA%/SERCA% | 0.7 ± 0.3 | 0.6 ± 0.3 | 0.8 ± 0.4 | 0.07 |
| N-SERCA%/SERCA% | 1.1 ± 0.5 | 1.0 ± 0.5 | 1.1 ± 0.4 | 0.51 |
| (S + N)-SERCA%/SERCA% | 1.8 ± 0.8 | 1.6 ± 0.8 | 2.0 ± 0.8 | 0.21 |
Unless otherwise specified, normally distributed values are presented as means ± standard deviations, and values with skewed distribution are expressed as medians with interquartile ranges.
yrs, years old; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; BNP, brain natriuretic peptide; CRP, C-reactive protein; ARB, angiotensin 2 receptor blocker; ACEI, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; CCB, calcium channel blocker; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVEDD, left ventricular end diastolic diameter; LVESD, left ventricular end systolic diameter; IVS, interventricular septum; PW, posterior wall; LA, left atrium; AO, aorta; RV, right ventricle; IVC, inferior vena cava; TRPG, tricuspid regurgitation pressure gradient; PRPG, pulmonary regurgitation pressure gradient; DCT, deceleration time; SERCA, sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase; S-SERCA, sulfonylation at cysteine-674; N-SERCA, nitration at tyrosine-294/295.
Fig. 2Representative cardiac magnetic resonance late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) images of LGE-present (A) and LGE-absent hearts (B). (C) The S-SERCA2 stained area was significantly increased in CMR LGE-present hearts (Unpaired t-test P = 0.008). N-SERCA2 tended to increase in CMR LGE-present hearts, but this was not statistically significant (Unpaired t-test P = 0.15). (D) Septal extracellular volume fraction showed significant positive correlation with fibrosis area (%) evaluated by Masson’s trichrome staining of the same tissue (Pearson’s correlation test r = 0.45, P = 0.047 [N = 20]). S-SERCA2/SERCA2 (E) and N-SERCA2/SERCA2 (F) showed significant positive correlation with fibrosis area (%) evaluated by Masson’s trichrome staining of the same EMB tissue (Pearson’s correlation test r = 0.51, P = 0.02 for S-SERCA2/SERCA2 [N = 20]; r = 0.50, P = 0.02 for N-SERCA2/SERCA2 [N = 20]).
Fig. 3A, SERCA2 modestly increased with aging in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (Pearson’s correlation test r = 0.32, P = 0.044). This association became prominent in older patients aged >65 years (Pearson’s correlation test r = 0.61, P = 0.003), but was not observed in younger patients aged ≤65 years (Pearson’s correlation test r = 0.20, P = 0.41). B and C, OPTM of SERCA2 tended to increase with aging, though this was not statistically significant (Pearson’s correlation test r = 0.29, P = 0.071 for S-SERCA2; r = 0.24, P = 0.13 for N-SERCA).
Fig. 4A, SERCA2 expression did not correlate with BNP values in older patients >65 years (Spearman’s rank correlation test ρ = −0.16, P = 0.72). B and C, OPTM of SERCA2 did not correlate with BNP values in older patients >65 years (Spearman’s rank correlation test ρ = 0.09, P = 0.72 for S-SERCA2; ρ = 0.10, P = 0.68 for N-SERCA2). D, SERCA2 did not correlate with BNP values in younger patients ≤65 years (Spearman’s rank correlation test ρ = −0.42, P = 0.07). E and F, Association between OPTM of SERCA2 and BNP values showed a positive correlation (Spearman’s rank correlation test ρ = 0.55, P = 0.01 for S-SERCA2; ρ = 0.42, P = 0.07 for N-SERCA2) in younger patients ≤65 years old with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Fig. 5Kaplan-Meier plot showing MACE-free survival in patients (A) >65 years and (B) ≤65 years with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. The rate of composite MACE including cardiovascular death, appropriate ICD therapy, and hospitalization due to exacerbation of heart failure was significantly higher in the high OPTM (>median) group compared to the low OPTM (≤median) group in younger patients (Log rank P = 0.045), whereas the extent of OPTM did not affect MACE-free survival in older patients (Log rank P = 0.92).
Association between high OPTM and MACE with stratification by age, sex, and LVEF.
| High OPTM | MACE | Odds ratio | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | |||||
| ≤65 years | 8/19 (42.1) | 3/19 (15.8) | * | * | 0.01 |
| >65 years | 12/21 (57.1) | 6/21 (28.6) | 0.67 | [0.10–4.48] | 0.68 |
| Sex | |||||
| Male | 10/25 (40.0) | 5/25 (20.0) | 2.79 | [0.37–20.82] | 0.31 |
| Female | 10/15 (66.7) | 4/15 (26.7) | 1.71 | [0.13–22.51] | 0.68 |
| LVEF | |||||
| <40% | 10/23 (43.5) | 1/23 (4.4) | * | * | 0.24 |
| ≥40% | 10/16 (62.5) | 8/16 (50.0) | 1.00 | [0.13–7.57] | 1.00 |
Odds ratio and 95% CI were blank (*) in patients ≤65 years and patients with LVEF <40% because all MACE were observed in patients with high OPTM. OPTM, oxidative posttranslational modifications; MACE, major cardiovascular events; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; CI, confidence interval.
Association between high OPTM and MACE after LVEF in multivariate analysis.
| Adjusted for LVEF | Adjusted for LVEF and aldosterone blocker use | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Odds ratio | 95% CI | Odds ratio | 95% CI | |||
| All ages | 2.0 | [0.4–11.2] | 0.42 | 7.7 | [0.64–91.2] | 0.11 |
| ≤65 years | * | * | 0.02 | * | * | 0.02 |
| >65 years | 0.5 | [0.1–5.4] | 0.57 | 5.5 | [0.1–414.3] | 0.40 |
Odds ratio and 95% CI were blank (*) in patients ≤65 years because all MACE was observed in patients with high OPTM. LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; CI, confidence interval.